Complete the logical proof for the following argument. P→ (q^r) q קר . Step 1 2 3 4 5 Proposition qV¬r קר Justification Hypothesis De Morgan's law, 2 Hypothesis Note that the justification for each step is either hypothesis or it would include both the name of the law or rule and the step(s) to which it is applied to.

Complete the logical proof for the following argument. P→ (q^r) q קר . Step 1 2 3 4 5 Proposition qV¬r קר Justification Hypothesis De Morgan's law, 2 Hypothesis Note that the justification for each step is either hypothesis or it would include both the name of the law or rule and the step(s) to which it is applied to.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Write and construct the truth table for the given statements/ propositions then indicate whether tautology, contingency, or contradiction: 2. ~[p v (~ p v r)] ∧ (p⟶q)
1. Given the following, can you prove the unicorn is mythical? How about Magi- cal? and Horned? (adapted from Barwise and Etchemendy (1993)). if the unicorn is mythical, then it is immortal, but if it is not mythical, then it is a mortal mammal. If the unicorn is either immortal or a mammal, then it is horned. The unicorn is magical if it is horned. 2. Which of the following are correct? (a) False E True (b) (A A B) E (A + B) (c) A + BEAVB (d) A + BE¬AV B (e) (A V B) ^ (¬A V B) is satisfiable
Recall that PA has as axioms P 1, · · · P 6 and the induction scheme. Show that P A ⊢ ∀x∀y(x · (sy) = x · y + x) First give the explicit instance of the induction scheme that you need. Then show how that induction axiom is used to establish the result. You do not need to give an LK proof, but justify each step of your argument with one of the axioms (P1, ..., P6 or whatever is appropriate). You may take equality reasoning for granted.
6. Use a truth table to determine whether the following argument form is valid. Indicate which columns represent the premises and which represent the conclusion, and include a sentence explaining how the truth table supports your answer. Your explanation should show that you understand what is means for a form of argument to be valid or invalid. Argument form: P→ r q→ r ..pvqr
1 Functional Dependencies The Armstrong Axioms are sound, complete, and independent. They are not the only options for reasoning about functional dependencies, however. For example, we have seen the Union and Decomposition rules. Next, we will explorer some alternative options: Problem 1. Consider the following inference rules: 1. If X Y and WY→ Z, then XWZ. 2. If XYZ and Z WV, then X→→→ YZV. 3. If X Y and Z CY, then X →→ Z. P1.1. Prove that the first inference rule is sound using only the Armstrong Axioms. P1.2. Prove that the second inference rule is sound directly from the definition of functional dependencies (without using any inference rules). P1.3. Prove that the third inference rule is sound. P1.4. Are these inference rules complete? If so, then prove why. Otherwise, show why not. HINT: You may assume that the Armstrong Axioms are complete. P1.5. Are these inference rules independent? If so, then show why. Otherwise, show why not. Problem 2. Consider the following two inference…
please answer with proper explanation and step by step solution.
2. Let p, q, r be propositions. Based on given truth values of individual propositions or compound propositions decide the missing truth value(s), if possible. Pick the correct answer (circle or underline, or use a color). No explanation is necessary. a) If p = T Aq =F Ar =T then (p → ¬q) O (p ^r) = .. TRUTH FALSE cannot be decided b) If p = T Aq = F Ar = F then (p Oq) → (q → r) = ... TRUTH FALSE cannot be decided c) If (p A-q) V (p → r) = F , then p Ar = .. TRUTH FALSE cannot be decided
Consider a proof system P in the style of box-proof which only have one logical connective A. The system only has one rule given by: [X] Y YAX Here, X and Y can represent any formula. Tick each that applies. In the proof system P it is possible to derive the formula ((AAC)AB)AA In the proof system P it is possible to derive AA(AA A) In the proof system P it is possible to derive the formula AAA In the proof system P it is possible to derive (AAA)^ A In the proof system P it is not possible to derive (AA B)A(BAA)