Coku-cola and Pepusi are two duopoly cola brands in the coke market. A market research had been conducted to show the preference of the customers. In the research, one of the element of coke, sweetness, was evaluated, scaling 0 to 1, as an indicator from lighter to sweeter. Based on the research, customers who preferred lighter coke would tend to choose Coku-cola, whereas customers who preferred sweeter coke would choose Pepusi. Investigators also found that the willing-to-pay price of the customers toward their preference was based on the scale of sweetness. The intangible cost to force a sweet-preferred customer to choose a light coke is $1, vice versa. For example, a customer who prefer 0.6 sweetness would buy a perfectly light coke by adding cost $0.6 or buy a perfectly sweet coke by adding $0.4. The sweetness of both brands were tested by a sweetness tester. The result came out that the sweetness of Coku-cola is 0 while the sweetness of Pepusi is 1. Assume the preference of customers toward sweetness is uniformly distributed from 0 to 1 in the market, and all customers would buy a single bottle of coke. a. Determine the equilibrium price of the two coke brands if customers would choose the brand with less cost. b. Determine the equilibrium price if the intangible cost is raised to 2.
Coku-cola and Pepusi are two duopoly cola brands in the coke market. A market research had been conducted to show the preference of the customers. In the research, one of the element of coke, sweetness, was evaluated, scaling 0 to 1, as an indicator from lighter to sweeter. Based on the research, customers who preferred lighter coke would tend to choose Coku-cola, whereas customers who preferred sweeter coke would choose Pepusi. Investigators also found that the willing-to-pay price of the customers toward their preference was based on the scale of sweetness. The intangible cost to force a sweet-preferred customer to choose a light coke is $1, vice versa. For example, a customer who prefer 0.6 sweetness would buy a perfectly light coke by adding cost $0.6 or buy a perfectly sweet coke by adding $0.4. The sweetness of both brands were tested by a sweetness tester. The result came out that the sweetness of Coku-cola is 0 while the sweetness of Pepusi is 1. Assume the preference of customers toward sweetness is uniformly distributed from 0 to 1 in the market, and all customers would buy a single bottle of coke. a. Determine the equilibrium price of the two coke brands if customers would choose the brand with less cost. b. Determine the equilibrium price if the intangible cost is raised to 2.
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question

Transcribed Image Text:Coku-cola and Pepusi are two duopoly cola brands in the coke market. A market
research had been conducted to show the preference of the customers. In the
research, one of the element of coke, sweetness, was evaluated, scaling 0 to 1, as
an indicator from lighter to sweeter. Based on the research, customers who
preferred lighter coke would tend to choose Coku-cola, whereas customers who
preferred sweeter coke would choose Pepusi. Investigators also found that the
willing-to-pay price of the customers toward their preference was based on the
scale of sweetness. The intangible cost to force a sweet-preferred customer to
choose a light coke is $1, vice versa. For example, a customer who prefer 0.6
sweetness would buy a perfectly light coke by adding cost $0.6 or buy a perfectly
sweet coke by adding $0.4. The sweetness of both brands were tested by a
sweetness tester. The result came out that the sweetness of Coku-cola is 0 while
the sweetness of Pepusi is 1. Assume the preference of customers toward
sweetness is uniformly distributed from 0 to 1 in the market, and all customers
would buy a single bottle of coke.
a. Determine the equilibrium price of the two coke brands if customers would
choose the brand with less cost.
b. Determine the equilibrium price if the intangible cost is raised to 2.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps with 2 images

Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education