Click and drag the steps in the correct order to show that 6 divides n³- n whenever n is a nonnegative integer using mathematicalinduction.BASIS STEP:INDUCTIVE STEP:6 (131), i.e., 610, the basis step is true.61 (03-0), i.e., 6 1 0, so the basis step is true.Suppose that 6 | k³ - k.By the inductive hypothesis, 61 (k³k). Clearly, 313k(k+1), but 3k(k+ 1) is also even as one of kork+ 1 is even; therefore, 6 | 3k(k+ 1) as well.By the inductive hypothesis, 3 I (K³-k). Clearly, 313k(k+1), but 3k(k+ 1) is also odd as one of k or k+ 1 is even; therefore, 6 | 3k(k+ 1) as well.(k+ 1)³(k+ 1) = (k³ + 3k² + 3k + 1) − (k+ 1) =(k³ k) + 3k(k+1)As the sum of two multiples of 6 is again divisibleby 6, 61 ((k+ 1)³ − (k+ 1)).

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/eeaabe0f-287a-423a-990e-87f5d5f9aeb2.jpg

Click and drag the steps in the correct order to show that 6 divides n³. - n whenever n is a nonnegative integer using mathematical induction. BASIS STEP: INDUCTIVE STEP: 61 (131), i.e., 610, the basis step is true. 61 (03-0), i.e., 610, so the basis step is true. Suppose that 61 k³ - k. By the inductive hypothesis, 6 I (K³-k). Clearly, 31 3k(k+ 1), but 3k(k+ 1) is also even as one of k or k+ 1 is even; therefore, 6 1 3k(k+ 1) as well. By the inductive hypothesis, 3 I (k³ - k). Clearly, 31 3k(k+ 1), but 3k(k+ 1) is also odd as one of kor k + 1 is even; therefore, 6 | 3k(k+ 1) as well. (k+ 1)³(k+ 1) = (k³ + 3k² + 3k + 1) - (k+ 1) = (ksk) + 3k(k+1) As the sum of two multiples of 6 is again divisible by 6, 61 ((k+ 1)³-(k+ 1)).

Click and drag the steps in the correct order to show that 6 divides n³. - n whenever n is a nonnegative integer using mathematical induction. BASIS STEP: INDUCTIVE STEP: 61 (131), i.e., 610, the basis step is true. 61 (03-0), i.e., 610, so the basis step is true. Suppose that 61 k³ - k. By the inductive hypothesis, 6 I (K³-k). Clearly, 31 3k(k+ 1), but 3k(k+ 1) is also even as one of k or k+ 1 is even; therefore, 6 1 3k(k+ 1) as well. By the inductive hypothesis, 3 I (k³ - k). Clearly, 31 3k(k+ 1), but 3k(k+ 1) is also odd as one of kor k + 1 is even; therefore, 6 | 3k(k+ 1) as well. (k+ 1)³(k+ 1) = (k³ + 3k² + 3k + 1) - (k+ 1) = (ksk) + 3k(k+1) As the sum of two multiples of 6 is again divisible by 6, 61 ((k+ 1)³-(k+ 1)).

Algebra and Trigonometry (6th Edition)

6th Edition

ISBN:9780134463216

Author:Robert F. Blitzer

Publisher:Robert F. Blitzer

ChapterP: Prerequisites: Fundamental Concepts Of Algebra

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1MCCP: In Exercises 1-25, simplify the given expression or perform the indicated operation (and simplify,...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Is it possible to help me for the last step? Please put a line around the final answer so I can understand.
Asap
Please help me with these two questions. I am having trouble understanding what to do. Thank you
Decide which of the following are valid proofs of the following statement: Let n be any integer. Then n³-n is divisible by 3. a) Assume n³ — n is divisible by 3. Let n³ n = 3b for some integer b. Let n = k + 1. Then n³ − n = (k + 1)³ – (k + 1) = k³ + 3k² + 3k + 1 − (k+ 1) = k³ + 3k² + 3k + 1 − k − 1 = (k³ − k) + 3k² + 3k = 3b + 3k² + 3k because k³ - k divisible by 3. = 3(b + k² + k) which is clearly divisible by 3. b) Note that n³ n = n(n² - 1) = n(n+1)(n − 1) which is the product of 3 consecutive integers, one of which must be a multiple of 3. Thus the product is a multiple of 3. c) Note that n³ - n = = n(n² — 1) and 3 is prime, so 3 | (n³ − n) if and only if either 3 | n or 3 | (n² — 1) (i.e. 3 divides one of its factors.) We have 3 cases depending on the remainder when n is divisible by 3 (also known as n mod 3). Let us address each case separately. case n = 0 case n = 1 mod 3. Then 3 n so 3 | n(n² — 1). mod 3. Then n = 3k + 1 for some integer k. Note that (3k + 1)² − 1 = 9k² + 6k+1…
Find how much interest $25,000 earns in 4 years in a certificate of deposit paying 9.5% interest compounded quarterly.
Pre calc 12
Use the Principle of Mathematical Induction to show that the given statement is true for all natural numbers n. 9+19+29++ (10n-1) = n(5n+ 4) 2 To prove that 9+19+29++ (10n-1) = n(5n+ 4) is true for all natural numbers n, first show that this statement is true for n= Simplify each side of the statement for the appropriate value of n. 9+19+29++ (10n-1) = n(5n+4) What is the next step in this induction proof? O A. Determine whether the statement holds for any number k + 1. OB. Assume the statement holds for some k, and determine whether it then holds for k + 1. OC. Determine whether the statement holds for some k. If so, it also holds for k + 1.
For each positive integer n, let P(n) be the property 5n − 1 is divisible by 4. Write P(0). Is P(0) true? Write P(k). Write P(k + 1). In a proof by mathematical induction that this divisibility property holds for all integers n ≥ 0, what must be shown in the inductive step?
In the proofs below, use the method of Mathematical Induction as explained in your textbook and the contents. Make sure you include the following: The initial step. The P(k) statement. The P(k+1 ) statement. Show your algebra steps clearly.
Please write clear
i need the answer quickly
Suppose a is a positive integer. Simplify the expression a Σ ((n + 2)³ + n³ - 2(n+1)³). n=1 [Explain in words what you are doing at each step. Your answer should not involve a sum, and your method should not involve evaluating a sum.]