Chamberlain had always followed an appeasement policy, believing that this was the best way to avoid Britain's involvement in another major war. As late as 15 March 1939, when German troops entered Czechoslovakia, Chamberlain was still claiming that Hitler had not broken the promises he made at Munich. By 17 March 1939, Chamberlain's attitude had changed. He was speaking critically of Hitler and making it clear that Britain would resist any future German aggression. Speaking in Birmingham on 17 March 1939, Chamberlain accepted that the policy of appeasement had failed. Chamberlain went on in the speech to consider the possibility that Hitler's actions against Czechoslovakia might be 'a step in the direction of an attempt to dominate the world by force'. As a direct warning to the German chancellor, he continued: 'No greater mistake could be made than to suppose that, because it believes war to be a senseless and cruel thing, this nation has so lost its fibre that it will not take part to the utmost of its power in resisting such a challenge if it were ever made...We value peace, but we value freedom even more'. By 17 March 1939, Chamberlain's attitude had changed. He was speaking critically of Hitler and making it clear that Britain would resist any future German aggression. How can we explain this sudden change? (this should be a minimum of one to two full pages or (3 to 5 full paragraphs).
Chamberlain had always followed an appeasement policy, believing that this was the best way to avoid Britain's involvement in another major war. As late as 15 March 1939, when German troops entered Czechoslovakia, Chamberlain was still claiming that Hitler had not broken the promises he made at Munich. By 17 March 1939, Chamberlain's attitude had changed. He was speaking critically of Hitler and making it clear that Britain would resist any future German aggression. Speaking in Birmingham on 17 March 1939, Chamberlain accepted that the policy of appeasement had failed. Chamberlain went on in the speech to consider the possibility that Hitler's actions against Czechoslovakia might be 'a step in the direction of an attempt to dominate the world by force'. As a direct warning to the German chancellor, he continued: 'No greater mistake could be made than to suppose that, because it believes war to be a senseless and cruel thing, this nation has so lost its fibre that it will not take part to the utmost of its power in resisting such a challenge if it were ever made...We value peace, but we value freedom even more'. By 17 March 1939, Chamberlain's attitude had changed. He was speaking critically of Hitler and making it clear that Britain would resist any future German aggression. How can we explain this sudden change? (this should be a minimum of one to two full pages or (3 to 5 full paragraphs).
Related questions
Question
100%
Please answer this history question. Do only 3-5 paragraphs
Transcribed Image Text:Chamberlain had always followed an appeasement policy, believing that this was the best way to
avoid Britain's involvement in another major war. As late as 15 March 1939, when German troops
entered Czechoslovakia, Chamberlain was still claiming that Hitler had not broken the promises he
made at Munich. By 17 March 1939, Chamberlain's attitude had changed. He was speaking critically of
Hitler and making it clear that Britain would resist any future German aggression.
Speaking in Birmingham on 17 March 1939, Chamberlain accepted that the policy of appeasement
had failed. Chamberlain went on in the speech to consider the possibility that Hitler's actions against
Czechoslovakia might be 'a step in the direction of an attempt to dominate the world by force'. As
a direct warning to the German chancellor, he continued: 'No greater mistake could be made than
to suppose that, because it believes war to be a senseless and cruel thing, this nation has so lost its
fibre that it will not take part to the utmost of its power in resisting such a challenge if it were ever
made...We value peace, but we value freedom even more'.
By 17 March 1939, Chamberlain's attitude had changed. He was speaking critically of Hitler and
making it clear that Britain would resist any future German aggression.
How can we explain this sudden change? (this should be a minimum of one to two full pages or (3 to
5 full paragraphs).
Expert Solution
Step 1
Introduction:
The sudden change in attitude towards Hitler by the British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, is a topic of historical significance. This shift marked a turning point in Britain's foreign policy and played a crucial role in the events leading up to World War II. Understanding the reasons behind Chamberlain's change in stance is essential for gaining a deeper understanding of the events of the period.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
