Cass. Sup- 2. Consider the following sequential variant of the public goods game w pose that there are 2 consumers, 1 and 2. First consumer 1 chooses a quantity ₁ ≥ 0 to provide of the public good. After observing 1's choice, 2 chooses a quantity 22 20 to provide. When the price of the public good is p, 1's payoff is u₁ (₁, 2) = a√√x₁ + x₂-p²₁ where a > 0 and 2's payoff is u₂(x1, x2) = √√x₁ + x₂ − px₂. (a) Suppose that a = 1. Show that this game has a Nash equilibrium in which 1 contributes a positive amount. Solution: There are many such Nash equilibria. One is for 1 to contribute and for 2 to contribute 0 regardless of how much 1 contributes.
Cass. Sup- 2. Consider the following sequential variant of the public goods game w pose that there are 2 consumers, 1 and 2. First consumer 1 chooses a quantity ₁ ≥ 0 to provide of the public good. After observing 1's choice, 2 chooses a quantity 22 20 to provide. When the price of the public good is p, 1's payoff is u₁ (₁, 2) = a√√x₁ + x₂-p²₁ where a > 0 and 2's payoff is u₂(x1, x2) = √√x₁ + x₂ − px₂. (a) Suppose that a = 1. Show that this game has a Nash equilibrium in which 1 contributes a positive amount. Solution: There are many such Nash equilibria. One is for 1 to contribute and for 2 to contribute 0 regardless of how much 1 contributes.
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
PLEASE HOW TO THINK ABOUT IT AND SOLVE
![Cass. Sup-
2. Consider the following sequential variant of the public goods game w
pose that there are 2 consumers, 1 and 2. First consumer 1 chooses a quantity ₁ ≥ 0 to
provide of the public good. After observing 1's choice, 2 chooses a quantity 2 ≥ 0 to provide.
When the price of the public good is p, 1's payoff is u₁(₁, 2) = a√x₁ + x₂-p²₁ where a > 0
and 2's payoff is u2(x1, x2) = √√T1+T2 — px2.
(a) Suppose that a = 1. Show that this game has a Nash equilibrium in which 1 contributes
a positive amount.
Solution: There are many such Nash equilibria. One is for 1 to contribute and for
2 to contribute 0 regardless of how much 1 contributes.
(b) Find all subgame perfect equilibria of this game for each (positive) value of a and p.
Solution: Use backward induction. If 1 contributes ₁, then 2's optimal action is to con-
tribute (1) max 7-2₁,0}. Given this strategy for 2, 1's payoff to contributing
₁ is
- px1
a√₁-pr
This payoff is maximized by choosing r1=0 if a < 2, x₁ = 0 or ₁ = 1/p² if a = 2, and
x₁ = if a > 2. Therefore, the subgame perfect equilibria are as follows:
if 1 ≤²
otherwise.
u(x₁, x₂(x₁)) =
i. If a < 2, there is a unique SPE given by x₁ = 0 and x2(x₁) = max.
{+ -21,0}.
ii. If a = 2, there are two SPE, one given by x₁ = 0 and x₂(x₁) = max {-₁,0},
{-1,0}.
I
the other given by x₁ = 1/p² and x₂(x₁) = max
iii. If a > 2, there is a unique SPE given by x₁ = and x₂(x₁) = max c{₁-2₁,0}.
(c) How does the total public good provision in part (b) compare to the Nash equilibrium
provision when the consumers choose simultaneously?
Solution: From class, total public good provision in the Nash equilibrium of the simul-
taneous game is
if a >1. In the sequential game, total provision is
if a > 2. Total provision is never higher in the
if a ≤ 1 and
ifa <2, or if a = 2, and
sequential game, and is strictly lower if 1 < a < 2.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F0542aa5b-cdbd-4921-99ff-0dadb1c30f45%2Fd296c2bd-c9d5-467d-aa41-1530f0d1ca3a%2Fjfvu2ec_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Cass. Sup-
2. Consider the following sequential variant of the public goods game w
pose that there are 2 consumers, 1 and 2. First consumer 1 chooses a quantity ₁ ≥ 0 to
provide of the public good. After observing 1's choice, 2 chooses a quantity 2 ≥ 0 to provide.
When the price of the public good is p, 1's payoff is u₁(₁, 2) = a√x₁ + x₂-p²₁ where a > 0
and 2's payoff is u2(x1, x2) = √√T1+T2 — px2.
(a) Suppose that a = 1. Show that this game has a Nash equilibrium in which 1 contributes
a positive amount.
Solution: There are many such Nash equilibria. One is for 1 to contribute and for
2 to contribute 0 regardless of how much 1 contributes.
(b) Find all subgame perfect equilibria of this game for each (positive) value of a and p.
Solution: Use backward induction. If 1 contributes ₁, then 2's optimal action is to con-
tribute (1) max 7-2₁,0}. Given this strategy for 2, 1's payoff to contributing
₁ is
- px1
a√₁-pr
This payoff is maximized by choosing r1=0 if a < 2, x₁ = 0 or ₁ = 1/p² if a = 2, and
x₁ = if a > 2. Therefore, the subgame perfect equilibria are as follows:
if 1 ≤²
otherwise.
u(x₁, x₂(x₁)) =
i. If a < 2, there is a unique SPE given by x₁ = 0 and x2(x₁) = max.
{+ -21,0}.
ii. If a = 2, there are two SPE, one given by x₁ = 0 and x₂(x₁) = max {-₁,0},
{-1,0}.
I
the other given by x₁ = 1/p² and x₂(x₁) = max
iii. If a > 2, there is a unique SPE given by x₁ = and x₂(x₁) = max c{₁-2₁,0}.
(c) How does the total public good provision in part (b) compare to the Nash equilibrium
provision when the consumers choose simultaneously?
Solution: From class, total public good provision in the Nash equilibrium of the simul-
taneous game is
if a >1. In the sequential game, total provision is
if a > 2. Total provision is never higher in the
if a ≤ 1 and
ifa <2, or if a = 2, and
sequential game, and is strictly lower if 1 < a < 2.
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
![ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9780190931919/9780190931919_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Principles of Economics (12th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134078779/9780134078779_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Engineering Economy (17th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134870069/9780134870069_smallCoverImage.gif)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
![ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9780190931919/9780190931919_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Principles of Economics (12th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134078779/9780134078779_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Engineering Economy (17th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134870069/9780134870069_smallCoverImage.gif)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305585126/9781305585126_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337106665/9781337106665_smallCoverImage.gif)
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259290619/9781259290619_smallCoverImage.gif)
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education