Case scenario: Karrie studied the effects of coffee drinking and subsequent development of pancreatic cancer. She got the following results: Risk Ratio (RR) = 0.35 p-value = 0.065 Interpret the RR. Group of answer choices A. There is 35% decreased risk of developing pancreatic CA among coffee drinkers B. There is 35% increased risk of developing pancreatic CA among coffee drinkers C. There is no risk in coffee consumption D. There is 65% decreased risk of developing pancreatic CA among coffee drinkers

Case scenario: Karrie studied the effects of coffee drinking and subsequent development of pancreatic cancer. She got the following results: Risk Ratio (RR) = 0.35 p-value = 0.065 Interpret the RR. Group of answer choices A. There is 35% decreased risk of developing pancreatic CA among coffee drinkers B. There is 35% increased risk of developing pancreatic CA among coffee drinkers C. There is no risk in coffee consumption D. There is 65% decreased risk of developing pancreatic CA among coffee drinkers

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)

10th Edition

ISBN:9780134753119

Author:Sheldon Ross

Publisher:Sheldon Ross

Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

We are testing whether a particular program of low impact exercise can improve the cholesterol level of stroke patients. We enroll a group of stroke patients in our study, and after six weeks we measure their serum cholesterol level in mmol/L, resulting in the following data: 6.1 9.3 6.3 4 9 5.5 6.3 4.2 4.7 7.8 4.3 7.5 9.1 4.2 6.9 8.1 5.6 9.4 8.3 8.8 7.2 5.7 6.5 3.8 3.8 9 9.4 4.5 8 7 4.5 9.4 6.6 4.1 6.6 9.1 3.9 5.3 (a) Construct a 95% confidence interval. _______< u < ______ From an existing study, we know that the average cholesterol level of all stroke patients is 7 mmol/L. We want to know if the level in our patients is significantly different from this. (b) What is our Test statistic? ______ (c) What is the two-tailed p-value of this result? ______
The table below displays the coronary artery disease data. The response, presence of coronary artery disease (CA), is dichotomous. The explanatory variables are sex and electrocardiogram (ECG) measurement. Sex ECG Disease No Disease Total Female Low 4 11 15 Female High 10 18 Male Low 18 Male High 21 27 Calculate the Mantel-Haenszel's estimate of the common odd-ratio value between ECG and coronary artery disease status. Round the value to the second decimal place. For example, 2.3414 would be 2.34.
3
A study was done to look at the relationship between number of lovers college students have had in their lifetimes and their GPAs. The results of the survey are shown below. Lovers 0 3 1 2 5 1 8 GPA 3.3 2.9 3.4 3.3 2.5 2.8 0.7 1. The p-value is: _____ (Round to four decimal places) 2. Use a level of significance of α=0.05 to state the conclusion of the hypothesis test in the context of the study (pick one). a. There is statistically significant evidence to conclude that there is a correlation between the number of lovers students have had in their lifetimes and their GPA. Thus, the regression line is useful. b. There is statistically significant evidence to conclude that a student who has had more lovers will have a lower GPA than a student who has had fewer lovers. c. There is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that a student who has had more lovers will have a lower GPA than a student who has had fewer lovers. d. There is statistically insignificant…
When we assess exposure before outcome, which of the following measures of association should be calculated? [ Exposure ratio Risk ratio Odds ratio Prevalence ratio In a clinical trial of 734 subjects treated with medicine A, 29 reported headaches. In a control group of 735 subjects not treated with medicine A, 117 reported headaches. The Absolute Risk Reduction is equal to: [ 0.119 0.334 0.893 0.987
I want the results of understanding these tables ?
A study is designed to investigate whether there is a difference in response to various treatments in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis. The outcome is the patient’s self-reported effect of treatment. The data are shown below. Is there a significant difference in effect of treatment? Run the test at a 5% level of significance. Symptoms Worsened No Effect Symptoms Improved Total Treatment 1 22 14 14 50 Treatment 2 14 15 21 50 Treatment 3 9 12 29 50 Using the data above, suppose we focus on the proportions of patients who show improvement. Is there a statistically significant difference in the proportions of patients who show improvement between treatments 1 and 2? Run the test at a 5% level of significance.
A psychologist would like to examine the effects of different testing methods on the final performance of college students. One group has regular quizzes, one group has three large exams, and the third group only has a final exam. At the end of the course, the psychologist interviews each student to get a measure of the student's overall knowledge of the material. Do these data indicate any significant differences among the three methods? Do the following computations: a. Compute and report the F Ratio at a a = .05 b. Compute and report the Tukey's HSD to determine exactly which methods are significantly different. Quizzes 4 6 3 7 T = 20 SS = 10 Exams 1 4 5 2 T = 12 SS= 10 Final Only 0 2 0 2 T=4 SS=4 G=36 EX² = 164 ✩
The old variety of a plant has 70% pink flowers. A new variety is developed. In a random sample of 93 plants from the new variety, 59 had pink flowers. Test the claim that the percent of plants with pink flowers for the new variety is different than 70%. Use a 0.10 level of significance. Question 6 options: DO NOT Reject H0 Using a 0.10 level of significance there is not evidence to say the proportion of pink flowers is different than 0.70 Reject H0 Using a 0.10 level of significance there is evidence to say the proportion of pink flowers is not different than 0.70
Using a significance level of α = 0.05, state your conclusion in terms of H0.?
1. The data in Table 7–6 were collected in a clinical trial to evaluate a new compound designed to improve wound healing in trauma patients. The new compound was com- pared against a placebo. After treatment for 5 days with the new compound or placebo, the extent of wound healing was measured. Is there a difference in the extent of wound healing between the treatments? (Hint: Are treatment and the percent wound healing independent?) Run the appropriate test at a 5% level of significance. Use the data in Problem 1. Pool the data across the treatments into one sample of size n = 250. Use the pooled data to test whether the distribution of the percent wound healing is approximately normal. Specifically, use the following distribution 30%, 40%, 20%, and 10% and a = 0.05 to run the appropriate test. Percent Wound Healing Treatment 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% New compound (n=125) 15 37 32 41 Placebo (n=125) 36 45 34 10
why the correct answer is letter E?