Cascade Pharmaceuticals Company developed the following regression model, using time-series data from the past 33 quarters, for one of its nonprescription cold remedies: Y=−1.04+0.24X1−0.27X2�=−1.04+0.24�1−0.27�2 where Y� = quarterly sales (in thousands of cases) of the cold remedy X1�1 = Cascade's quarterly advertising (× $1,000) for the cold remedy X2�2 = competitors' advertising for similar products (× $10,000) Here is additional information concerning the regression model: sb1=0.042�b1=0.042, sb2=0.070�b2=0.070, R2=0.720�2=0.720, se=1.63��=1.63, F-statistic=31.402F-statistic=31.402, and Durbin-Watson (d) statistic=0.499Durbin-Watson (d) statistic=0.499. Which of the independent variables (if any) appears to be statistically significant (at the 0.05 level) in explaining sales of the cold remedy? (Hint: t0.05/2,33 - 3=2.042�0.05/2,33 - 3=2.042.) Check all that apply. X1�1 X2�2 What proportion of the total variation in sales is explained by the regression equation? 0.720 0.042 0.112 0.070 The given F-value shows that you reject the null hypothesis that neither of the independent variables explains a significant (at the 0.05 level) proportion of the variation in income. (Hint: F0.05,2,33 - 2 - 1=3.316�0.05,2,33 - 2 - 1=3.316.)

College Algebra

1st Edition

ISBN:9781938168383

Author:Jay Abramson

Publisher:Jay Abramson

Chapter6: Exponential And Logarithmic Functions

Section6.8: Fitting Exponential Models To Data

Problem 3TI: Table 6 shows the population, in thousands, of harbor seals in the Wadden Sea over the years 1997 to...

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

Cascade Pharmaceuticals Company developed the following regression model, using time-series data from the past 33 quarters, for one of its nonprescription cold remedies:

Y=−1.04+0.24X1−0.27X2�=−1.04+0.24�1−0.27�2

where

Y� = quarterly sales (in thousands of cases) of the cold remedy

X1�1 = Cascade's quarterly advertising (× $1,000) for the cold remedy

X2�2 = competitors' advertising for similar products (× $10,000)

Here is additional information concerning the regression model:

sb1=0.042�b1=0.042, sb2=0.070�b2=0.070, R2=0.720�2=0.720, se=1.63��=1.63, F-statistic=31.402F-statistic=31.402, and Durbin-Watson (d) statistic=0.499Durbin-Watson (d) statistic=0.499.

Which of the independent variables (if any) appears to be statistically significant (at the 0.05 level) in explaining sales of the cold remedy? (Hint: t0.05/2,33 - 3=2.042�0.05/2,33 - 3=2.042.) Check all that apply.

X1�1

X2�2

What proportion of the total variation in sales is explained by the regression equation?

0.720

0.042

0.112

0.070

The given F-value shows that you reject the null hypothesis that neither of the independent variables explains a significant (at the 0.05 level) proportion of the variation in income. (Hint: F0.05,2,33 - 2 - 1=3.316�0.05,2,33 - 2 - 1=3.316.)

Expert Solution