(c) different mean porosity values. Support your conclusions about each comparison. If post-hoc tests are not required, explain why not. If required, perform post-hoc tests to determine which rock types have significantly (d) State and check the assumptions that are necessary for the analysis in part (b).
(c) different mean porosity values. Support your conclusions about each comparison. If post-hoc tests are not required, explain why not. If required, perform post-hoc tests to determine which rock types have significantly (d) State and check the assumptions that are necessary for the analysis in part (b).
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
part C D
| 33000331 | UPH-1 | St. Lawrence | dolomite | 618 | 0.05 | 2.69 | 2.74 | 2.83 |
| 48000168 | Langer | Platteville | dolomite | 127.8 | 0.06 | 2.69 | 2.75 | 2.86 |
| 52000415 | 3-21-13z1 | Galena | dolomite | 575 | 0.04 | 2.72 | 2.76 | 2.83 |
| 52000415 | 3-21-13z1 | Platteville | dolomite | 740 | 0.05 | 2.7 | 2.75 | 2.85 |
| 60000086 | VD #1 | Silurian | dolomite | 684 | 0.03 | 2.75 | 2.78 | 2.83 |
| 60000086 | VD #1 | Galena | dolomite | 1070 | 0.05 | 2.69 | 2.74 | 2.84 |
| 60000086 | VD #1 | Platteville | dolomite | 1142 | 0.02 | 2.77 | 2.79 | 2.83 |
| 13001466 | NS-2 | Tunnel City | sandstone | 60.1 | 0.14 | 2.41 | 2.54 | 2.79 |
| 13001466 | NS-2 | Tunnel City | sandstone | 60.2 | 0.28 | 1.93 | 2.21 | 2.67 |
| 13001466 | NS-2 | Tunnel City | sandstone | 118.3 | 0.3 | 1.88 | 2.18 | 2.7 |
| 33000331 | UPH-1 | St. Peter | sandstone | 222 | 0.22 | 2.06 | 2.28 | 2.65 |
| 33000331 | UPH-1 | Jordan | sandstone | 531 | 0.21 | 2.09 | 2.3 | 2.65 |
| 33000331 | UPH-1 | Tunnel City | sandstone | 644 | 0.18 | 2.22 | 2.4 | 2.7 |
| 33000331 | UPH-1 | Wonewoc | sandstone | 735 | 0.2 | 2.12 | 2.32 | 2.65 |
| 33000331 | UPH-1 | Wonewoc | sandstone | 840 | 0.27 | 1.93 | 2.2 | 2.66 |
| 33000331 | UPH-1 | Mt. Simon | sandstone | 927 | 0.18 | 2.31 | 2.49 | 2.81 |
| 33000331 | UPH-1 | Mt. Simon | sandstone | 1128 | 0.2 | 2.13 | 2.33 | 2.65 |
| 33000331 | UPH-1 | Mt. Simon | sandstone | 1444 | 0.19 | 2.15 | 2.34 | 2.65 |
| 33000331 | UPH-1 | Mt. Simon | sandstone | 1982 | 0.11 | 2.35 | 2.46 | 2.65 |
| 48000168 | Langer | St. Peter | sandstone | 146.5 | 0.2 | 2.13 | 2.33 | 2.65 |
| 52000415 | 3-21-13z1 | St. Peter | sandstone | 853 | 0.19 | 2.14 | 2.33 | 2.65 |
| 60000086 | VD #1 | St. Peter | sandstone | 1295 | 0.12 | 2.33 | 2.45 | 2.65 |
| 60000086 | VD #1 | Tunnel City | sandstone | 1388 | 0.17 | 2.2 | 2.37 | 2.65 |
| 60000086 | VD #1 | Wonewoc | sandstone | 1470 | 0.14 | 2.27 | 2.42 | 2.66 |
| 60000086 | VD #1 | Eau Claire | sandstone | 1542 | 0.17 | 2.26 | 2.43 | 2.73 |
| 13001467 | NS-3 | Eau Claire | shale | 288.4 | 0.15 | 2.29 | 2.43 | 2.68 |
| 13001467 | NS-3 | Eau Claire | shale | 295.2 | 0.12 | 2.41 | 2.53 | 2.74 |
| 13001467 | NS-3 | Eau Claire | shale | 295.8 | 0.08 | 2.57 | 2.65 | 2.79 |
| 33000331 | UPH-1 | Eau Claire | shale | 854 | 0.11 | 2.43 | 2.54 | 2.73 |
| 60000086 | VD #1 | Maquoketa | shale | 753 | 0.08 | 2.58 | 2.66 | 2.8 |
Transcribed Image Text:WGNHS ID
Site name
Formation
8a Lithology
Depth(ft)
Porosity
Dry densi.
Wet density (g/cm3)
Grain density (g/cm3)
33000331 UPH-1
St. Lawrence
dolomite
618.0
0.05
2.69
2.74
2.83
2
48000168 Langer
Platteville
dolomite
127.8
0.06
2.69
2.75
2.86
3.
52000415 3-21-13z1
Galena
dolomite
575.0
0.04
2.72
2.76
2.83
4
52000415 3-21-13z1
Platteville
dolomite
740.0
0.05
2.70
2.75
2.85
5
60000086 VD #1
Silurian
dolomite
684.0
0.03
2.75
2.78
2.83
6
60000086 VD #1
Galena
dolomite
1070.0
0.05
2.69
2.74
2.84
7.
60000086 VD 1
Platteville
dolomite
1142.0
0.02
2.77
2.79
2.83
8.
13001466 NS-2
Tunnel City
sandstone
60.1
0.14
2.41
2.54
2.79
9
13001466 NS-2
Tunnel City
sandstone
60.2
0.28
1.93
2.21
2.67
10
13001466 NS-2
Tunnel City
sandstone
118.3
0.30
1.88
2.18
2.70
11
33000331 UPH-1
St. Peter
sandstone
222.0
0.22
2.06
2.28
2.65
12
33000331
UPH-1
Jordan
sandstone
531.0
0.21
2.09
2.30
2.65
13
33000331
UPH-1
Tunnel City
sandstone
644.0
0.18
2.22
2.40
2.70
14
33000331
UPH-1
Wonewoc
sandstone
735.0
0.20
2.12
2.32
2.65
15
33000331 UPH-1
Wonewoc
sandstone
840.0
0.27
1.93
2.20
2.66
16
33000331 UPH-1
Mt. Simon
sandstone
927.0
0.18
2.31
2.49
2.81
17
33000331
UPH-1
Mt. Simon
sandstone
1128.0
0.20
2.13
2.33
2.65
18
33000331 UPH-1
Mt. Simon
sandstone
1444.0
0.19
2.15
2.34
2.65
19
33000331 UPH-1
Mt. Simon
sandstone
1982.0
0.11
2.35
2.46
2.65
20
48000168 Langer
St. Peter
sandstone
146.5
0.20
2.13
2.33
2.65
21
52000415 3-21-13z1
St. Peter
sandstone
853.0
0.19
2.14
2.33
2.65
22
60000086 VD #1
St. Peter
sandstone
1295.0
0.12
2.33
2.45
2.65
23
60000086 VD #1
Tunnel City
sandstone
1388.0
0.17
2.20
2.37
2.65
24
60000086 VD #1
Wonewoc
sandstone
1470.0
0.14
2.27
2.42
2.66
25
60000086 VD #1
Eau Claire
sandstone
1542.0
0.17
2.26
2.43
2.73
26
13001467 NS-3
Eau Claire
shale
288.4
0.15
2.29
2.43
2.68
27
13001467 NS-3
Eau Claire
shale
295.2
0.12
2.41
2.53
2.74
28
13001467 NS-3
Eau Claire
shale
295.8
0.08
2.57
2.65
2.79
29
33000331 UPH-1
Eau Claire
shale
854.0
0.11
2.43
2.54
2.73
30
60000086 VD #1
Maquoketa
shale
753.0
0.08
2.58
2.66
2.80
31
Transcribed Image Text:The data set 9 geology-data.omv has been downloaded from the above website and is also available
on Canvas. The data set shows several variables related to core samples taken throughout Wisconsin's
aquifers and aquitards.
(a)
difference in the average Porosity between the three types of rock (Lithology) in the data set.
Compare the location of each distribution of porosity and comment on whether you think there
is a diffence in the population means.
Provide an appropriate plot and summary statistics to investigate if there is a
(b)
across the three rock types at the five percent significance level. Be sure to state the null and
alternative hypotheses, the observed test statistic, the null distribution, the p-value, and an
appropriate conclusion in plain language.
Perform an appropriate test to see if there is a significant difference in porosity
(c)
ditterent mean porosity values. Support your conclusions about each comparison. If post-hoc
tests are not required, explain why not.
If required, perform post-hoc tests to determine which rock types have significantly
(d)
State and check the assumptions that are necessary for the analysis in part (b).
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 1 images
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman