BUSINESS LAW 3 - David Ungar holds a Dunkin’ Donut's franchise. The terms of his franchise agreement require him to use only those ingredients furnished by Dunkin’ Donuts. He is also required to buy its napkins, cups, and so on, with the Dunkin’ Donut's trademark on them. Is this an illegal tying arrangement? What if Dunkin’ Donuts maintains that it needs these requirements to maintain its quality levels on a nationwide basis? [Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts of America, Inc., 429 U.S
BUSINESS LAW
3 - David Ungar holds a Dunkin’ Donut's franchise. The terms of his franchise agreement require him to use only those ingredients furnished by Dunkin’ Donuts. He is also required to buy its napkins, cups, and so on, with the Dunkin’ Donut's trademark on them. Is this an illegal tying arrangement? What if Dunkin’ Donuts maintains that it needs these requirements to maintain its quality levels on a nationwide basis? [Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts of America, Inc., 429 U.S
5 - Hines Cosmetic Co. sold beauty preparations nationally to beauty shops at a standard or fixed- price
7 - What is the Federal Register? What role does it play in rulemaking? What is the difference between the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations?
12 - The Michigan Freedom of Information Act declares that it is the state’s policy to give all persons full information about the actions of the government and that “the people shall be informed so that they may participate in the democratic process.” The union of clerical workers at Michigan State University requested the trustees of the university to give them the names and addresses of persons making monetary donations to the university. Michigan State objected because the disclosure of addresses was a violation of the right of privacy. Decide. [Clerical-Technical Union of Michigan State University v. Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, 475 N.W.2d 373 (Mich.)]
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
