Bubble Wrap Ca (BWC), an Atlanta corporation, has its principal place of business in New York John, a resident of Florida, falsely asserted on his website that BWC is engaged in ongoing criminal activity, scams, and phishing BWC sued John in the US. District Court for the District of New York, alleging defamation and injury to BWC's business in New York. John filed a motion to dismiss the case alleging that neither subject-matter nor in personam jurisdiction existed. The court granted the defendant's motion and dismissed the cane. What is the best reason? A. The court does not have in personam jurisdiction. B. The court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction C. There is no subject-matter jurisdiction nor in personam . . jurisdiction. D. The Statement do not amount to defamation.
Bubble Wrap Ca (BWC), an Atlanta corporation, has its principal place of business in New York John, a resident of Florida, falsely asserted on his website that BWC is engaged in ongoing criminal activity, scams, and phishing BWC sued John in the US. District Court for the District of New York, alleging defamation and injury to BWC's business in New York. John filed a motion to dismiss the case alleging that neither subject-matter nor in personam jurisdiction existed. The court granted the defendant's motion and dismissed the cane. What is the best reason? A. The court does not have in personam jurisdiction. B. The court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction C. There is no subject-matter jurisdiction nor in personam . . jurisdiction. D. The Statement do not amount to defamation.
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
Bubble Wrap Ca (BWC), an Atlanta corporation, has its principal place of business in New York John, a resident of Florida, falsely asserted on his website that BWC is engaged in ongoing criminal activity, scams, and phishing BWC sued John in the US. District Court for the District of New York, alleging defamation and injury to BWC's business in New York. John filed a motion to dismiss the case alleging that neither subject-matter nor in personam jurisdiction existed. The court granted the defendant's motion and dismissed the cane. What is the best reason?
A. The court does not have in personam jurisdiction.
B. The court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction
C. There is no subject-matter jurisdiction nor in personam . . jurisdiction.
D. The Statement do not amount to defamation.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education