Briefly describe the results for both the Competence Ratings and Intelligence data (Trait Ratings data). Your answer must include a brief (couple sentences) interpretation of the data (i.e., if one or both main effects and/or the interaction were significant, then you need to state what it reflected).    Competence ratings. There was a main effect for appearance such that participants rated the target as more competent when she dressed more conservatively (M =5.29, SD = .85) than when she dressed in a sexy manner (M = 4.46, SD = .95), F(1, 62) = 13.54, p < .01. As expected, there was also a significant career by appearance interaction, F(1, 62) = 4.77, p < .05. Comparisons of cell means (see Table 2) revealed that participants rated the receptionist as equally competent whether she was dressed in a sexy or a neutral manner. In contrast, participants rated the manager as less competent when she dressed in a sexy manner than when she dressed in a conservative manner, t(26) = −3.57, p < .01.

Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
5th Edition
ISBN:9780134477961
Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Chapter1: The Science Of Psychology
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1TY
icon
Related questions
Question

Briefly describe the results for both the Competence Ratings and Intelligence data (Trait Ratings data). Your answer must include a brief (couple sentences) interpretation of the data (i.e., if one or both main effects and/or the interaction were significant, then you need to state what it reflected). 

 

Competence ratings. There was a main effect for appearance such that participants rated the target as more
competent when she dressed more conservatively (M =5.29, SD = .85) than when she dressed in a sexy manner
(M = 4.46, SD = .95), F(1, 62) = 13.54, p < .01. As expected, there was also a significant career by appearance interaction, F(1, 62) = 4.77, p < .05. Comparisons of cell means (see Table 2) revealed that participants rated the receptionist as equally competent whether she was dressed in a sexy or a neutral manner. In contrast, participants rated the manager as less competent when she dressed in a sexy manner than when she dressed in a conservative manner, t(26) = −3.57, p < .01.

 
 
Intelligence. Unlike the competence ratings, the per-
ceived intelligence items (target's estimated GPA and selec-
tivity of her college) referred to more objective benchmarks
that should be less subject to shifting standards (Biernat &
Manis, 1994). There were no main effects for either the ca-
reer or the appearance manipulation. The predicted career
by appearance interaction was significant, F(1, 62) = 4.36,
p < .05. Comparisons of cell means (see Table 2) showed
that participants rated the receptionist as equally intelligent
whether she dressed in a sexy or a neutral manner. In con-
trast, participants rated the manager as less intelligent when
she dressed in a sexy manner than when she dressed in a
neutral manner, t(26) = -2.10, p < .05.
In summary, as with emotion ratings, competence and
intelligence ratings were affected by the appearance ma-
nipulation when the participants believed the target was a
manager but not when they believed she was a receptionist.
Participants viewed the sexy manager as less competent and
less intelligent than the conservatively dressed manager.
Transcribed Image Text:Intelligence. Unlike the competence ratings, the per- ceived intelligence items (target's estimated GPA and selec- tivity of her college) referred to more objective benchmarks that should be less subject to shifting standards (Biernat & Manis, 1994). There were no main effects for either the ca- reer or the appearance manipulation. The predicted career by appearance interaction was significant, F(1, 62) = 4.36, p < .05. Comparisons of cell means (see Table 2) showed that participants rated the receptionist as equally intelligent whether she dressed in a sexy or a neutral manner. In con- trast, participants rated the manager as less intelligent when she dressed in a sexy manner than when she dressed in a neutral manner, t(26) = -2.10, p < .05. In summary, as with emotion ratings, competence and intelligence ratings were affected by the appearance ma- nipulation when the participants believed the target was a manager but not when they believed she was a receptionist. Participants viewed the sexy manager as less competent and less intelligent than the conservatively dressed manager.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780134477961
Author:
Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:
PEARSON
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337408271
Author:
Goldstein, E. Bruce.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337565691
Author:
Dennis Coon, John O. Mitterer, Tanya S. Martini
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780393265156
Author:
Sarah Grison, Michael Gazzaniga
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Psychology
ISBN:
9781285763880
Author:
E. Bruce Goldstein
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Psychology
ISBN:
9781305652958
Author:
Duane P. Schultz, Sydney Ellen Schultz
Publisher:
Cengage Learning