Both Mallock's "Removing Confederate Monuments and Other Reminders of Slavery Hides Valuable History" and EJI's The Truth About Confederate Named Schools" touch on the debate of preserving vs. removing problematic elements of American history within schools and other public spaces . Not considering which viewpoint you specifically agree with evaluate the quality of both articles. Which of the two do you think is most effective in conveying its central idea? Write a three paragraph argumentative piece explaining which of the two is more effective and why. Make sure to include specific text evidence in your response .

Both Mallock's "Removing Confederate Monuments and Other Reminders of Slavery Hides Valuable History" and EJI's The Truth About Confederate Named Schools" touch on the debate of preserving vs. removing problematic elements of American history within schools and other public spaces . Not considering which viewpoint you specifically agree with evaluate the quality of both articles. Which of the two do you think is most effective in conveying its central idea? Write a three paragraph argumentative piece explaining which of the two is more effective and why. Make sure to include specific text evidence in your response .