Surrogation is another bias that managers frequently unintentionally exhibit. A brief example of this bias is illustrated in the following story: The management of a restaurant chain seeking to improve customer satisfaction uses online customer re- views as a measure of this strategic objective. To encourage this objective, management offered a generous bonus to all employees at restaurant locations that increase their online customer review rating by one star. After a few months, management noticed the online customer review rating had dramatically increased at one particular location and paid out the increased bonus. Upon further investigation, management discov- ered that the manager of this location was offering 15% discounts on all purchases to anyone who gave the restaurant a 5-star review. This story illustrates surrogation bias because, at that particular location, the performance measure was being treated like the strategic objective. While the performance rating improved, it was not reflective of the strategic objective it was meant to measure (customer satisfaction). a. How can the cognitive biases of motivated reasoning and surrogation affect the usefulness of the balanced scorecard? b. Develop some ideas of how you can protect yourself from falling prey to each of these biases. Biases like motivated reasoning and surrogation are very prevalent in the business world. Man- agers are often compensated and evaluated based on performance measures such as production costs and profit margin. Hence, when subjective decisions need to be made regarding joint cost allocation, support department cost allocation, and budgeting, managers are motivated to believe and overvalue evidence that supports their products receiving less cost allocations, more budgeting, and other favorable outcomes. At the same time, managers will discount any evidence or reasoning that does not produce a favorable outcome for them. This is all part of the bias known as motivated reasoning. It is important to note, as well, that people exhibit the motivated reasoning bias unconsciously. In other words, people commonly overvalue favorable information and discount unfavorable information without realizing it. (Continued)

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
10th Edition
ISBN:9781259964947
Author:Libby
Publisher:Libby
Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1Q
icon
Related questions
Question
Surrogation is another bias that managers frequently unintentionally exhibit. A brief example of
this bias is illustrated in the following story:
The management of a restaurant chain seeking to improve customer satisfaction uses online customer re-
views as a measure of this strategic objective. To encourage this objective, management offered a generous
bonus to all employees at restaurant locations that increase their online customer review rating by one star.
After a few months, management noticed the online customer review rating had dramatically increased at
one particular location and paid out the increased bonus. Upon further investigation, management discov-
ered that the manager of this location was offering 15% discounts on all purchases to anyone who gave the
restaurant a 5-star review.
This story illustrates surrogation bias because, at that particular location, the performance
measure was being treated like the strategic objective. While the performance rating improved,
it was not reflective of the strategic objective it was meant to measure (customer satisfaction).
a.
How can the cognitive biases of motivated reasoning and surrogation affect the
usefulness of the balanced scorecard?
b.
Develop some ideas of how you can protect yourself from falling prey to each of
these biases.
Transcribed Image Text:Surrogation is another bias that managers frequently unintentionally exhibit. A brief example of this bias is illustrated in the following story: The management of a restaurant chain seeking to improve customer satisfaction uses online customer re- views as a measure of this strategic objective. To encourage this objective, management offered a generous bonus to all employees at restaurant locations that increase their online customer review rating by one star. After a few months, management noticed the online customer review rating had dramatically increased at one particular location and paid out the increased bonus. Upon further investigation, management discov- ered that the manager of this location was offering 15% discounts on all purchases to anyone who gave the restaurant a 5-star review. This story illustrates surrogation bias because, at that particular location, the performance measure was being treated like the strategic objective. While the performance rating improved, it was not reflective of the strategic objective it was meant to measure (customer satisfaction). a. How can the cognitive biases of motivated reasoning and surrogation affect the usefulness of the balanced scorecard? b. Develop some ideas of how you can protect yourself from falling prey to each of these biases.
Biases like motivated reasoning and surrogation are very prevalent in the business world. Man-
agers are often compensated and evaluated based on performance measures such as production
costs and profit margin. Hence, when subjective decisions need to be made regarding joint
cost allocation, support department cost allocation, and budgeting, managers are motivated
to believe and overvalue evidence that supports their products receiving less cost allocations,
more budgeting, and other favorable outcomes. At the same time, managers will discount any
evidence or reasoning that does not produce a favorable outcome for them. This is all part of
the bias known as motivated reasoning. It is important to note, as well, that people exhibit the
motivated reasoning bias unconsciously. In other words, people commonly overvalue favorable
information and discount unfavorable information without realizing it.
(Continued)
Transcribed Image Text:Biases like motivated reasoning and surrogation are very prevalent in the business world. Man- agers are often compensated and evaluated based on performance measures such as production costs and profit margin. Hence, when subjective decisions need to be made regarding joint cost allocation, support department cost allocation, and budgeting, managers are motivated to believe and overvalue evidence that supports their products receiving less cost allocations, more budgeting, and other favorable outcomes. At the same time, managers will discount any evidence or reasoning that does not produce a favorable outcome for them. This is all part of the bias known as motivated reasoning. It is important to note, as well, that people exhibit the motivated reasoning bias unconsciously. In other words, people commonly overvalue favorable information and discount unfavorable information without realizing it. (Continued)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Quality control
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259964947
Author:
Libby
Publisher:
MCG
Accounting
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Accounting
ISBN:
9780134475585
Author:
Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Intermediate Accounting
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259722660
Author:
J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259726705
Author:
John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education