question 10Based on the following cash flows and an interest rate of 10% per yearAlternativeX-300,000-65,00025,0005First cost, $Annual cost, $/yearSalvage value, $Life, years-850,000-10,000160,000%001) What is the Annual Worth of Alternative X? $2) What is the Annual Worth of Alternative Y? $3) What is the annual worth of the first cost and salvage value for project X? $4) What is the annual worth of the first cost and salvage value for project Y? $5) What is the interest rate?6) What is the project life for Alternative X?7) What is the project life for Alternative Y? (Click to select)✓ yearsyears

Present value is the value of investment in today's dollar. Future value is the value of investment…

Based on the following cash flows and an interest rate of 10% per year Alternative X First cost, $ Annual cost, $/year Salvage value, $ Life, years -300,000 -65,000 25,000 5 1) What is the Annual Worth of Alternative X? $ 2) What is the Annual Worth of Alternative Y? $ -850,000 -10,000 160,000 00 00 3) What is the annual worth of the first cost and salvage value for project X? $

Based on the following cash flows and an interest rate of 10% per year Alternative X First cost, $ Annual cost, $/year Salvage value, $ Life, years -300,000 -65,000 25,000 5 1) What is the Annual Worth of Alternative X? $ 2) What is the Annual Worth of Alternative Y? $ -850,000 -10,000 160,000 00 00 3) What is the annual worth of the first cost and salvage value for project X? $

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Select the best alternative through internal rate of return analysis. Assume that the minimum attractive rate of return is 10% per year. Machine X |Machine YInitial cost $ 400,000.00 $ 500,000.00Annual operating cost $ 15,000.00 |$ 25,000.00 Annual profit $ 20,000.00 |$ 40,000.00Residual value $ 85,000.00 |$ 100,000.00Project life 15 years | none Engineering Economic Analysis
Compare the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an interest rate of 14% per year and a study period of 10 years. Alternative First Cost AOC, per Year Annual Increase in Operating Cost, per Year Salvage Value Life, Years с $-48,000 $-9,000 $-1,400 $8,000 10 The present worth of alternative C is $ -117974.14 Alternative D offers the lower present worth. D $-34,000 $-9,000 $-1,500 $1,400 5 and that of alternative D is $ -73129.34 x
The TT Racing and Performance Motor Corporation wish to evaluate two alternative machines for NASCAR motor tune-ups. Machine First cost, $ Annual operating cost, $ per year Life, years Salvage value, $ The better alternative is machine R R > -276,000 -40,000 Use the AW method at 9% per year to select the better alternative. The annual worth of machine R is $- 4 20,500 S 2 -335,500 -50,000 5 17,400 and the annual worth of machine S is $-
Required information One of two methods must be used to produce expansion anchors. Method A costs $65.000 initially and will have a $14.000 salvage value after 3 years. The operating cost with this method will be $23,000 per year. Method B will have a first cost of $140,000, an operating cost of $14,000 per year, and a $32.000 salvage value after its 3-year life. The interest rate for both the methods is 15%. Which method should be used on the basis of a present worth analysis? The present worth of method A Is $ and that of method B is $ Method (Cick to solect) v is selected by the company.
A consulting engineering firm is considering two models of SUVs for the company principals. A GM model will have a first cost of $36,000, an operating cost of $4000, and a salvage value of $15,000 after 3 years. A Ford model will have a first cost of $32,000, an operating cost of $3100, and also have a $15,000 resale value, but after 4 years. (a) At an interest rate of 15% per year, which model should the consulting firm buy? Conduct an annual worth analysis. (b) What are the PW values for each vehicle? 10 16 -22)
Required information PEMEX, Mexico's petroleum corporation, has an estimated budget for oil and gas exploration that includes equipment for three offshore platforms as shown. Use PW analysis to select the best alternative at a MARR of 16% per year. Platform First cost, $ million Y Z -300 -450 -510 M&O, $ million per year -320 -290 -230 Salvage value, $ million 75 50 90 Estimated life, years 20 20 20 Select platform X, Y, or Z using tabulated factors. The present worth of platform X is $- 2298.4 worth of platform Z is $- 1944.14 million, the present worth of platform Y is $- 2262.15 million, and the present million. The platform selected based on the present worth is platform Z
Dexcon Technologies, Inc., is evaluating two alternatives to produce its new plastic filament with low friction properties for creating custom bearings for 3-D printers. The estimates associated with each alternative are shown below. Using a MARR of 16% per year, which alternative has the better present worth and what is that value (select the closest value)? Method First Cost AOC, per Year Salvage Value Life DDM $170,000 $65,000 $4,000 2 years LS $350,000 $40,000 $29,000 4 years DDM with a PW--$473,000 LS with a PW --$445,900 LS with a PW --$222,055 DDM with a PW--$109,300
Dexcon Technologies, Inc., is evaluating two alternatives to produce its new plastic filament with tribological (ie.. low friction) properties for creating custom bearings for 3-D printers. The estimates associated with each alternative are shown below. Using a MARR of 10% per year, which alternative has the lower present worth? Method First Cost M&O Cost, per Year Salvage Value Life DDM $-190,000 $-55,000 $4,000 2 years The present worth for the DDM method is $ The present worth for the LS method is $ The LS method is selected. LS $-430,000 $-25,000 $39,000 4 years
Compare three mutually exclusive alternatives on the basis of their capitalized costs at i =10% per year. Alternative |First cost, $ AOC, $/year Salvage value, $| Life, years B2 300,000 |-10,000 |70,000 A1 -50,000 C3 |-30,000 5,000 2 900,000| 3,000 |200,000
A remotely located air sampling station can be powered by solar cells or by running an electric line to the site and using conventional power. Solar cells will cost $7000 to install and will have a useful life of 4 years with no salvage value. Annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc. are expected to be $1600. A new power line will cost $14000 to install, with power costs expected to be $1300 per year. Since the air sampling project will end in 4 years, the salvage value of the line is considered to be zero. At an interest rate of 8.00% per year, which alternative should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis? (Include a minus sign if necessary.) The future worth of solar cells is $[ and that of electric line is $ (Click to select) :) should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis.
1. Two methods can be used for producing expansion anchors. Method A costs $70,000 initially and will have a $15,000 salvage value after 3 years. The operating cost with this method will be $30,000 per year. Method B will have a first cost of $135,000, an operating cost of $8,000 per year, and a $40,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. At the MARR of 12% per year, which method should be used on the basis of a present worth analysis?
You have two machines under consideration for an improved automated wrapping process for Snickers Fun Size candy bars as detailed below. Using an AW analysis, determine which should be selected at i = 15% per year. Machine First cost, $ Annual cost, $/year Salvage value, $ Life, years C -40,000 -10,000 12,000 3 D -65,000 -12,000 25,000