Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
Background: Morris Saldov conducted a study in Eastern and Central Newfoundland in 1988 to examine public attitudes towards social spending. In particular, the study tried to determine if knowing someone on public assistance (yes, no) affected one's views on social spending (too little, about right, too much). The data from the study is summarized in the table below. Too little About right Too much Total Yes No 42 7 49 15 11 26 97 16 66 25 91 Source: Morris Saldov, Public Attitudes to Social Spending in Newfoundland," Canadian Review of Social Policy, 26, November 1990, pages 10-14. Total Directions: Conduct a chi-square test for independence to determine if the association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending is statistically significant. 1. Choose the correct null and alternative hypotheses. O Ho: There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Ha There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. O Ho: There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Ha There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Too little 2. Compute the test statistic. Complete the following table of expected counts. (Round your answers to 3 decimal places). About right Too much Yes No Compute the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to 2 decimal places.) x² = 3. Compute the p-value. (Round your answer to 4 decimal places.) p-value= 4. Interpret the results of the significance test. The p-value provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis. The association between knowing someone on public assistance and attitudes towards social spending is statistically significant. From a practical perspective, a person who knows someone on public assistance is 2.3 te likely to believe that too little is spent on social needs

Background: Morris Saldov conducted a study in Eastern and Central Newfoundland in 1988 to examine public attitudes towards social spending. In particular, the study tried to determine if knowing someone on public assistance (yes, no) affected one's views on social spending (too little, about right, too much). The data from the study is summarized in the table below. Too little About right Too much Total Yes No 42 7 49 15 11 26 97 16 66 25 91 Source: Morris Saldov, Public Attitudes to Social Spending in Newfoundland," Canadian Review of Social Policy, 26, November 1990, pages 10-14. Total Directions: Conduct a chi-square test for independence to determine if the association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending is statistically significant. 1. Choose the correct null and alternative hypotheses. O Ho: There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Ha There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. O Ho: There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Ha There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Too little 2. Compute the test statistic. Complete the following table of expected counts. (Round your answers to 3 decimal places). About right Too much Yes No Compute the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to 2 decimal places.) x² = 3. Compute the p-value. (Round your answer to 4 decimal places.) p-value= 4. Interpret the results of the significance test. The p-value provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis. The association between knowing someone on public assistance and attitudes towards social spending is statistically significant. From a practical perspective, a person who knows someone on public assistance is 2.3 te likely to believe that too little is spent on social needs

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
Background: Morris Saldov conducted a study in Eastern and Central Newfoundland in 1988 to examine public attitudes towards social spending. In particular, the study tried to determine if knowing someone on public assistance (yes, no) affected one's views on social spending (too little, about right, too much). The data from the study is summarized in the table below. Too little About right Too much Total Source: Morris Saldov, Public Attitudes to Social Spending in Newfoundland," Canadian Review of Social Policy, 26, November 1990, pages 10-14. Directions: Conduct a chi-square test for independence to determine if the association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social. spending is statistically significant. Yes No No 42 7 1. Choose the correct null and alternative hypotheses. O Ho: There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Ha There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Too little Total 49 15 11 26 9 7 16 66 25 91 O Ho: There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Ha There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. About right 2. Compute the test statistic. Complete the following table of expected counts. (Round your answers to 3 decimal places). Too much x² = p-value= Yes Compute the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to 2 decimal places.) No 3. Compute the p-value. (Round your answer to 4 decimal places.) 4. Interpret the results of the significance test. The p-value provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis. The association between knowing someone on public assistance and attitudes towards social spending is statistically significant. From a practical perspective, a person who knows someone on public assistance is 2.3 times more likely to believe that too little is spent on social needs.
Transcribed Image Text:Background: Morris Saldov conducted a study in Eastern and Central Newfoundland in 1988 to examine public attitudes towards social spending. In particular, the study tried to determine if knowing someone on public assistance (yes, no) affected one's views on social spending (too little, about right, too much). The data from the study is summarized in the table below. Too little About right Too much Total Source: Morris Saldov, Public Attitudes to Social Spending in Newfoundland," Canadian Review of Social Policy, 26, November 1990, pages 10-14. Directions: Conduct a chi-square test for independence to determine if the association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social. spending is statistically significant. Yes No No 42 7 1. Choose the correct null and alternative hypotheses. O Ho: There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Ha There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Too little Total 49 15 11 26 9 7 16 66 25 91 O Ho: There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Ha There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. About right 2. Compute the test statistic. Complete the following table of expected counts. (Round your answers to 3 decimal places). Too much x² = p-value= Yes Compute the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to 2 decimal places.) No 3. Compute the p-value. (Round your answer to 4 decimal places.) 4. Interpret the results of the significance test. The p-value provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis. The association between knowing someone on public assistance and attitudes towards social spending is statistically significant. From a practical perspective, a person who knows someone on public assistance is 2.3 times more likely to believe that too little is spent on social needs.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS