B. Tradeoffs with Quality Costs. Consider the following problem. Banga, Inc. is a startup company engaged in the production of a biofertilizer. It has a sales of 8 million and quality costs of 1.6 million. Consistent with their vision of sustainability by reducing wastes and preventing risks, it is embarking on a major quality improvement program. During the next three years, Banga intends to attack failure costs by increasing its appraisal and prevention costs. The "right" prevention activities will be selected, and appraisal costs will be reduced according to the results achieved. For the year 2023, management is considering six specific activities: quality training, process control, product inspection, supplier evaluation, prototype testing, and re-design of two major products. To encourage managers to focus on reducing non- value-added quality costs and select the right activities, a bonus pool is established relating to the reduction of quality costs. The bonus pool is equal to 10 per cent of the total reduction in quality costs. Current quality costs and the costs of these six activities are provided in the table below. Each activity is added sequentially so that its effect on the cost categories can be assessed. For example, after quality training is added, the control costs increase to 320, 000, and the failure costs drop to 1, 040, 000. Even though the activities are presented sequentially, they are totally independent of each other. Thus, only beneficial activities need to be selected. Control Costs 1. 2 Current quality costs Quality training Process control Product inspection Supplier evaluation. Prototype testing Engineering re-design 160,000 320,000 520, 000 600,000 720,000 960,000 1,000,000 Failure Costs b. .Given the activities selected in (1), calculate the following a. The reduction in quality costs 1,440,000 1,040,000 Identify the control activities that should be implemented, and calculate the total quality costs associated with this selection. Assume that an activity is selected only if it increases the bonus pool. 720,000 656,000 200,000 120,000 40,000 b. The percentage distribution for control and failure costs. How do you compare this with the current scenario? What are your insights about this change? c. The amount of bonus pool for 2023 3. Suppose that a quality engineer complained about the gainsharing incentive system. Basically, he argued that the bonus should be based only on reductions of failure and appraisal costs. In this way, investment in prevention activities would be encouraged, and eventually, failure and appraisal costs would be eliminated. After eliminating the non-value-added costs, focus could then be placed on the level of prevention costs. a. If this approach were adopted, what activities would be selected? How much would be the bonus pool? Do you agree or disagree with this approach. Explain.

Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...
icon
Related questions
Question
B. Tradeoffs with Quality Costs. Consider the following problem.
Banga, Inc. is a startup company engaged in the production of a biofertilizer. It has a sales of 8
million and quality costs of 1.6 million. Consistent with their vision of sustainability by reducing
wastes and preventing risks, it is embarking on a major quality improvement program. During the
next three years, Banga intends to attack failure costs by increasing its appraisal and prevention
costs. The "right" prevention activities will be selected, and appraisal costs will be reduced
according the results achieved. For the year 2023, management is considering six specific
activities: quality training, process control, product inspection, supplier evaluation, prototype
testing, and re-design of two major products. To encourage managers to focus on reducing non-
value-added quality costs and select the right activities, a bonus pool is established relating to the
reduction of quality costs. The bonus pool is equal to 10 per cent of the total reduction in quality
costs.
Current quality costs and the costs of these six activities are provided in the table below. Each
activity is added sequentially so that its effect on the cost categories can be assessed. For
example, after quality training is added, the control costs increase to 320, 000, and the failure
costs drop to 1,040, 000. Even though the activities are presented sequentially, they are totally
independent of each other. Thus, only beneficial activities need to be selected.
1.
2
Current quality costs
Quality training
Process control
Product inspection
Supplier evaluation
Prototype testing
Engineering re-design
b.
Control Costs
160, 000
320, 000
520, 000
600,000
720,000
960, 000
1,000,000
Failure Costs
.Given the activities selected in (1), calculate the following
a. The reduction in quality costs
b.
1,440,000
1,040,000
720,000
656, 000
Identify the control activities that should be implemented, and calculate the total
quality costs associated with this selection. Assume that an activity is selected only if it
increases the bonus pool.
200,000
120,000
40,000
The percentage distribution for control and failure costs. How do you compare this with
the current scenario? What are your insights about this change?
c. The amount of bonus pool for 2023
3. Suppose that a quality engineer complained about the gainsharing incentive system. Basically,
he argued that the bonus should be based only on reductions of failure and appraisal costs. In
this way, investment in prevention activities would be encouraged, and eventually, failure and
appraisal costs would be eliminated. After eliminating the non-value-added costs, focus could
then be placed on the level of prevention costs.
a.
If this approach were adopted, what activities would be selected? How much
would be the bonus pool?
Do you agree or disagree with this approach. Explain.
Transcribed Image Text:B. Tradeoffs with Quality Costs. Consider the following problem. Banga, Inc. is a startup company engaged in the production of a biofertilizer. It has a sales of 8 million and quality costs of 1.6 million. Consistent with their vision of sustainability by reducing wastes and preventing risks, it is embarking on a major quality improvement program. During the next three years, Banga intends to attack failure costs by increasing its appraisal and prevention costs. The "right" prevention activities will be selected, and appraisal costs will be reduced according the results achieved. For the year 2023, management is considering six specific activities: quality training, process control, product inspection, supplier evaluation, prototype testing, and re-design of two major products. To encourage managers to focus on reducing non- value-added quality costs and select the right activities, a bonus pool is established relating to the reduction of quality costs. The bonus pool is equal to 10 per cent of the total reduction in quality costs. Current quality costs and the costs of these six activities are provided in the table below. Each activity is added sequentially so that its effect on the cost categories can be assessed. For example, after quality training is added, the control costs increase to 320, 000, and the failure costs drop to 1,040, 000. Even though the activities are presented sequentially, they are totally independent of each other. Thus, only beneficial activities need to be selected. 1. 2 Current quality costs Quality training Process control Product inspection Supplier evaluation Prototype testing Engineering re-design b. Control Costs 160, 000 320, 000 520, 000 600,000 720,000 960, 000 1,000,000 Failure Costs .Given the activities selected in (1), calculate the following a. The reduction in quality costs b. 1,440,000 1,040,000 720,000 656, 000 Identify the control activities that should be implemented, and calculate the total quality costs associated with this selection. Assume that an activity is selected only if it increases the bonus pool. 200,000 120,000 40,000 The percentage distribution for control and failure costs. How do you compare this with the current scenario? What are your insights about this change? c. The amount of bonus pool for 2023 3. Suppose that a quality engineer complained about the gainsharing incentive system. Basically, he argued that the bonus should be based only on reductions of failure and appraisal costs. In this way, investment in prevention activities would be encouraged, and eventually, failure and appraisal costs would be eliminated. After eliminating the non-value-added costs, focus could then be placed on the level of prevention costs. a. If this approach were adopted, what activities would be selected? How much would be the bonus pool? Do you agree or disagree with this approach. Explain.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Operations Management
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Business in Action
Business in Action
Operations Management
ISBN:
9780135198100
Author:
BOVEE
Publisher:
PEARSON CO
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781478623069
Author:
Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:
Waveland Press, Inc.