Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
b. Perform a hypothesis test to test whether the proportion of patients who achieve a positive outcome with the current treatment (ritonavir-boosted darunavir) is less than the pro positive outcome with the new treatment (dorovirine). Use a significance level of 0.01. Analyze the results and determine if dorovirine is a more effective treatment for HIV-1 than Consider population 1 to be the ritonavir-boosted darunavir with the proportion of positive outcomes p, and population 2 to be the dorovirine with the proportion of positive outco alternative hypotheses for the hypothesis test? O A. Ho: P1 = P2 Ha: P1 P2 OC. Ho: P1 =P2 Ha: P1 # P2 O D. Ho: P1 > P2 Ha: P1 = P2 O E. Ho: P1 * P2 Ha: P1 = P2 OF. Ho: P1

b. Perform a hypothesis test to test whether the proportion of patients who achieve a positive outcome with the current treatment (ritonavir-boosted darunavir) is less than the pro positive outcome with the new treatment (dorovirine). Use a significance level of 0.01. Analyze the results and determine if dorovirine is a more effective treatment for HIV-1 than Consider population 1 to be the ritonavir-boosted darunavir with the proportion of positive outcomes p, and population 2 to be the dorovirine with the proportion of positive outco alternative hypotheses for the hypothesis test? O A. Ho: P1 = P2 Ha: P1 P2 OC. Ho: P1 =P2 Ha: P1 # P2 O D. Ho: P1 > P2 Ha: P1 = P2 O E. Ho: P1 * P2 Ha: P1 = P2 OF. Ho: P1

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
100%
Can someone please explain these for me? I’m very confused.
(Round to two decimal places as needed.) b. Perform a hypothesis test to test whether the proportion of patients who achieve a positive outcome with the current treatment (ritonavir-boosted darunavir) is less than the pro positive outcome with the new treatment (dorovirine). Use a significance level of 0.01. Analyze the results and determine if dorovirine is a more effective treatment for HIV-1 than Consider population 1 to be the ritonavir-boosted darunavir with the proportion of positive outcomes p, and population 2 to be the dorovirine with the proportion of positive outco alternative hypotheses for the hypothesis test? O A. Ho: P1 = P2 Ha: P1 <P2 O D. Ho: P1 > P2 Ha: P1 = P2 O B. Ho: P1 = P2 Ha: P1 > P2 O E. Ho: P1 # P2 OC. Ho: P1 = P2 Ha: P1 #P2 OF. Ho: P1 <P2 Hg: P1 =P2 Ha: P1 = P2 Identify the test statistic. z= (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Identify the p-value. p-value = (Round to three décimal places as needed.) Since the p-value is (1) the significance level of a = 0.01, (2) the null hypothesis. There is (3). evidence to support the clai ritonavir-boosted darunavir group is (4) the percentage from the dorovirine group. Analyze the results. Is dorovirine a more effective treatment for HIV-1 than ritonavir-boosted darunavir? Why or why not? O A. Yes, since the decision of the test was to fail to reject the null hypothesis of the proportion from the ritonavir-boosted darunavir group being greater than the proporti O B. No, since the decision of the test was to fail to reject the null hypothesis of no difference. O C. No; although the decision of the test was to reject the null hypothesis of no difference, it cannot be concluded that one treatment is better than the other-it can on O D. Yes, since the decision of the test was to reject the null hypothesis of no difference. (1) O greater than O less than O reject O fail to reject (2) (3) O insufficient O sufficient (4) O greater than O different from O. less than MacBook Pro
Transcribed Image Text:(Round to two decimal places as needed.) b. Perform a hypothesis test to test whether the proportion of patients who achieve a positive outcome with the current treatment (ritonavir-boosted darunavir) is less than the pro positive outcome with the new treatment (dorovirine). Use a significance level of 0.01. Analyze the results and determine if dorovirine is a more effective treatment for HIV-1 than Consider population 1 to be the ritonavir-boosted darunavir with the proportion of positive outcomes p, and population 2 to be the dorovirine with the proportion of positive outco alternative hypotheses for the hypothesis test? O A. Ho: P1 = P2 Ha: P1 <P2 O D. Ho: P1 > P2 Ha: P1 = P2 O B. Ho: P1 = P2 Ha: P1 > P2 O E. Ho: P1 # P2 OC. Ho: P1 = P2 Ha: P1 #P2 OF. Ho: P1 <P2 Hg: P1 =P2 Ha: P1 = P2 Identify the test statistic. z= (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Identify the p-value. p-value = (Round to three décimal places as needed.) Since the p-value is (1) the significance level of a = 0.01, (2) the null hypothesis. There is (3). evidence to support the clai ritonavir-boosted darunavir group is (4) the percentage from the dorovirine group. Analyze the results. Is dorovirine a more effective treatment for HIV-1 than ritonavir-boosted darunavir? Why or why not? O A. Yes, since the decision of the test was to fail to reject the null hypothesis of the proportion from the ritonavir-boosted darunavir group being greater than the proporti O B. No, since the decision of the test was to fail to reject the null hypothesis of no difference. O C. No; although the decision of the test was to reject the null hypothesis of no difference, it cannot be concluded that one treatment is better than the other-it can on O D. Yes, since the decision of the test was to reject the null hypothesis of no difference. (1) O greater than O less than O reject O fail to reject (2) (3) O insufficient O sufficient (4) O greater than O different from O. less than MacBook Pro
Print 40. A study for the treatment of patients with HIV-1 was a randomized, controlled, double-blind study that compared the effectiveness of ritonavir-boosted darunavir (rbd), the drug currently used to treat HIV-1, with dorovirine, a newly developed drug. Of the 384 subjects taking ritonavir-boosted darunavir, 309 achieved a positive result. Of the 384 subjects taking dorovirine, 325 achieved a positive result. Complete parts (a) and (b). a. Find the sample percentage of subjects who achieved a positive outcome in each group. The sample percentage of subjects who achieve a positive outcome with ritonavir-boosted darunavir is %. The sample percentage of subjects who achieve a positive outcome with dorovirine is %. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) b. Perform a hypothesis test to test whether the proportion of patients who achieve a positive outcome with the current treatment (ritonavir-boosted darunavir) is less than the proportion of patients who achieve a positive outcome with the new treatment (dorovirine). Use a significance level of 0.01. Analyze the results and determine if dorovirine is a more effective treatment for HIV-1 than ritonavir-boosted darunavir, Consider population 1 to be the ritonavir-boosted darunavir with the proportion of positive outcomes p, and population 2 to be the dorovirine with the proportion of positive outcomes p2. What are the null and alternative hypotheses for the hypothesis test? O A. Ho: P1 = P2 Ha: P1 <P2 O B. Ho: P1 = P2 H: P, > P2 OC. Ho: P1 = P2 Ha: P1 #P2 O D. Ho: P1 > P2 Ha: P1 = P2 O E. Ho: P1 * P2 Hạ: P1 =P2 OF. Ho: P1 <P2 Ha: P1 =P2 Identify the test statistic. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Identify the p-value. p-value = (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Since the p-value is (1) the significance level of a = 0.01, (2) the null hypothesis. There is (3) evidence to support the claim that the percentage from the ritonavir-boosted darunavir group is (4). the percentage from the dorovirine group. Analyze the results. Is dorovirine a more effective treatment for HIV-1 than ritonavir-boosted darunavir? Why or why not? O A. Yes, since the decision of the test was to fail to reject the null hypothesis of the proportion from the ritonavir-boosted darunavir group being greater than the proportion of the dorovirine group. O B. No, since the decision of the test was to fail to reject the null hypothesis of no difference. OC. No; although the decision of the test was to reject the null hypothesis of no difference, it cannot be concluded that one treatment is better than the other-it can only be concluded that they are different. O D. Yes, since the decision of the test was to reject the null hypothesis of no difference. MacBook Pro esc G Search or type URL @ #3 2$ % & 2 3 4 7 8 9. dele LO
Transcribed Image Text:Print 40. A study for the treatment of patients with HIV-1 was a randomized, controlled, double-blind study that compared the effectiveness of ritonavir-boosted darunavir (rbd), the drug currently used to treat HIV-1, with dorovirine, a newly developed drug. Of the 384 subjects taking ritonavir-boosted darunavir, 309 achieved a positive result. Of the 384 subjects taking dorovirine, 325 achieved a positive result. Complete parts (a) and (b). a. Find the sample percentage of subjects who achieved a positive outcome in each group. The sample percentage of subjects who achieve a positive outcome with ritonavir-boosted darunavir is %. The sample percentage of subjects who achieve a positive outcome with dorovirine is %. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) b. Perform a hypothesis test to test whether the proportion of patients who achieve a positive outcome with the current treatment (ritonavir-boosted darunavir) is less than the proportion of patients who achieve a positive outcome with the new treatment (dorovirine). Use a significance level of 0.01. Analyze the results and determine if dorovirine is a more effective treatment for HIV-1 than ritonavir-boosted darunavir, Consider population 1 to be the ritonavir-boosted darunavir with the proportion of positive outcomes p, and population 2 to be the dorovirine with the proportion of positive outcomes p2. What are the null and alternative hypotheses for the hypothesis test? O A. Ho: P1 = P2 Ha: P1 <P2 O B. Ho: P1 = P2 H: P, > P2 OC. Ho: P1 = P2 Ha: P1 #P2 O D. Ho: P1 > P2 Ha: P1 = P2 O E. Ho: P1 * P2 Hạ: P1 =P2 OF. Ho: P1 <P2 Ha: P1 =P2 Identify the test statistic. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Identify the p-value. p-value = (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Since the p-value is (1) the significance level of a = 0.01, (2) the null hypothesis. There is (3) evidence to support the claim that the percentage from the ritonavir-boosted darunavir group is (4). the percentage from the dorovirine group. Analyze the results. Is dorovirine a more effective treatment for HIV-1 than ritonavir-boosted darunavir? Why or why not? O A. Yes, since the decision of the test was to fail to reject the null hypothesis of the proportion from the ritonavir-boosted darunavir group being greater than the proportion of the dorovirine group. O B. No, since the decision of the test was to fail to reject the null hypothesis of no difference. OC. No; although the decision of the test was to reject the null hypothesis of no difference, it cannot be concluded that one treatment is better than the other-it can only be concluded that they are different. O D. Yes, since the decision of the test was to reject the null hypothesis of no difference. MacBook Pro esc G Search or type URL @ #3 2$ % & 2 3 4 7 8 9. dele LO
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Research Design Formulation
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS