(b) In the example presented in the video, the electric flux was calculated along the sides of an imaginary rectangular box drawn between two charged plates, as shown in the image bele was true about the electric flux calculated on the top and bottom surfaces of the box? + + + + + + + + + + + + The electric flux on the top surface and bottom surface had opposite signs and noticeably different magnitudes. The electric flux on the top surface and bottom surface were equal in both magnitude and sign. The electric flux on the bottom surface had the same magnitude but opposite sign as the flux on the top surface. O The electric flux on the top surface and bottom surface were both equal to zero. (c) In the same example from the video described above, what was true about the electric flux calculated on the left and right surfaces of the box? The electric flux on the left surface and right surface were both equal to zero. The electric flux on the left surface and right surface were equal in both magnitude and sign. Both were nonzero. The electric flux on the left surface and right surface had opposite signs and noticeably different magnitudes. The electric flux on the left surface had the same magnitude but opposite sign as the flux on the right surface. Both were nonzero. (d) Which of the following statements best describes the relationship between the electric flux and electric charge for the example of the rectangular box presented in the video? The electric flux was zero on the left and right sides of the box, and nonzero on the top and bottom sides. The total electric flux was therefore nonzero, and so there must have been some electric charge inside the box. The electric field on all sides of the box was zero, so the total electric flux was zero, and there was no charge inside the box. Electric field was measured on the surfaces of the box. Therefore, there must have been some electric charge inside the box. Even though there was electric field measured on the surfaces of the box, the total electric flux was zero, and there was no charge inside the box. (e) Which statement below best describes the usefulness of Gauss's law? OGauss's law can never be used to find the electric field. It only can be used to find the electric flux. Gauss's law can always be used to find the electric field, no matter the charge distribution. Gauss's law can sometimes be used to find the electric field, provided the Gaussian surface is rectangular. Gauss's law can sometimes be used to find the electric field, particularly in cases where the field is zero, constant, or highly symmetric.
(b) In the example presented in the video, the electric flux was calculated along the sides of an imaginary rectangular box drawn between two charged plates, as shown in the image bele was true about the electric flux calculated on the top and bottom surfaces of the box? + + + + + + + + + + + + The electric flux on the top surface and bottom surface had opposite signs and noticeably different magnitudes. The electric flux on the top surface and bottom surface were equal in both magnitude and sign. The electric flux on the bottom surface had the same magnitude but opposite sign as the flux on the top surface. O The electric flux on the top surface and bottom surface were both equal to zero. (c) In the same example from the video described above, what was true about the electric flux calculated on the left and right surfaces of the box? The electric flux on the left surface and right surface were both equal to zero. The electric flux on the left surface and right surface were equal in both magnitude and sign. Both were nonzero. The electric flux on the left surface and right surface had opposite signs and noticeably different magnitudes. The electric flux on the left surface had the same magnitude but opposite sign as the flux on the right surface. Both were nonzero. (d) Which of the following statements best describes the relationship between the electric flux and electric charge for the example of the rectangular box presented in the video? The electric flux was zero on the left and right sides of the box, and nonzero on the top and bottom sides. The total electric flux was therefore nonzero, and so there must have been some electric charge inside the box. The electric field on all sides of the box was zero, so the total electric flux was zero, and there was no charge inside the box. Electric field was measured on the surfaces of the box. Therefore, there must have been some electric charge inside the box. Even though there was electric field measured on the surfaces of the box, the total electric flux was zero, and there was no charge inside the box. (e) Which statement below best describes the usefulness of Gauss's law? OGauss's law can never be used to find the electric field. It only can be used to find the electric flux. Gauss's law can always be used to find the electric field, no matter the charge distribution. Gauss's law can sometimes be used to find the electric field, provided the Gaussian surface is rectangular. Gauss's law can sometimes be used to find the electric field, particularly in cases where the field is zero, constant, or highly symmetric.
College Physics
11th Edition
ISBN:9781305952300
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Chapter1: Units, Trigonometry. And Vectors
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1CQ: Estimate the order of magnitude of the length, in meters, of each of the following; (a) a mouse, (b)...
Related questions
Question
100%
![(b) In the example presented in the video, the electric flux was calculated along the sides of an imaginary rectangular box drawn between two charged plates, as shown in the image below.
was true about the electric flux calculated on the top and bottom surfaces of the box?
The electric flux on the top surface and bottom surface had opposite signs and noticeably different magnitudes.
The electric flux on the top surface and bottom surface were equal in both magnitude and sign.
The electric flux on the bottom surface had the same magnitude but opposite sign as the flux on the top surface.
The electric flux on the top surface and bottom surface were both equal to zero.
(c) In the same example from the video described above, what was true about the electric flux calculated on the left and right surfaces of the box?
The electric flux on the left surface and right surface were both equal to zero.
O The electric flux on the left surface and right surface were equal in both magnitude and sign. Both were nonzero.
The electric flux on the left surface and right surface had opposite signs and noticeably different magnitudes.
The electric flux on the left surface had the same magnitude but opposite sign as the flux on the right surface. Both were nonzero.
(d) Which of the following statements best describes the relationship between the electric flux and electric charge for the example of the rectangular box presented in the video?
The electric flux was zero on the left and right sides of the box, and nonzero on the top and bottom sides. The total electric flux was therefore nonzero, and so there must have been
some electric charge inside the box.
The electric field on all sides of the box was zero, so the total electric flux was zero, and there was no charge inside the box.
Electric field was measured on the surfaces of the box. Therefore, there must have been some electric charge inside the box.
Even though there was electric field measured on the surfaces of the box, the total electric flux was zero, and there was no charge inside the box.
(e) Which statement below best describes the usefulness of Gauss's law?
0000
Gauss's law can never be used to find the electric field. It only can be used to find the electric flux.
Gauss's law can always be used to find the electric field, no matter the charge distribution.
Gauss's law can sometimes be used to find the electric field, provided the Gaussian surface is rectangular.
Gauss's law can sometimes be used to find the electric field, particularly in cases where the field is zero, constant, or highly symmetric.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Ff113c375-0851-4916-ac22-f87d5ae8280a%2F67ff9485-ba40-440d-844a-0ade447ffabb%2F13ojqm_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:(b) In the example presented in the video, the electric flux was calculated along the sides of an imaginary rectangular box drawn between two charged plates, as shown in the image below.
was true about the electric flux calculated on the top and bottom surfaces of the box?
The electric flux on the top surface and bottom surface had opposite signs and noticeably different magnitudes.
The electric flux on the top surface and bottom surface were equal in both magnitude and sign.
The electric flux on the bottom surface had the same magnitude but opposite sign as the flux on the top surface.
The electric flux on the top surface and bottom surface were both equal to zero.
(c) In the same example from the video described above, what was true about the electric flux calculated on the left and right surfaces of the box?
The electric flux on the left surface and right surface were both equal to zero.
O The electric flux on the left surface and right surface were equal in both magnitude and sign. Both were nonzero.
The electric flux on the left surface and right surface had opposite signs and noticeably different magnitudes.
The electric flux on the left surface had the same magnitude but opposite sign as the flux on the right surface. Both were nonzero.
(d) Which of the following statements best describes the relationship between the electric flux and electric charge for the example of the rectangular box presented in the video?
The electric flux was zero on the left and right sides of the box, and nonzero on the top and bottom sides. The total electric flux was therefore nonzero, and so there must have been
some electric charge inside the box.
The electric field on all sides of the box was zero, so the total electric flux was zero, and there was no charge inside the box.
Electric field was measured on the surfaces of the box. Therefore, there must have been some electric charge inside the box.
Even though there was electric field measured on the surfaces of the box, the total electric flux was zero, and there was no charge inside the box.
(e) Which statement below best describes the usefulness of Gauss's law?
0000
Gauss's law can never be used to find the electric field. It only can be used to find the electric flux.
Gauss's law can always be used to find the electric field, no matter the charge distribution.
Gauss's law can sometimes be used to find the electric field, provided the Gaussian surface is rectangular.
Gauss's law can sometimes be used to find the electric field, particularly in cases where the field is zero, constant, or highly symmetric.
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
![College Physics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305952300/9781305952300_smallCoverImage.gif)
College Physics
Physics
ISBN:
9781305952300
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![University Physics (14th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780133969290/9780133969290_smallCoverImage.gif)
University Physics (14th Edition)
Physics
ISBN:
9780133969290
Author:
Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Introduction To Quantum Mechanics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781107189638/9781107189638_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Physics
ISBN:
9781107189638
Author:
Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
![College Physics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305952300/9781305952300_smallCoverImage.gif)
College Physics
Physics
ISBN:
9781305952300
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![University Physics (14th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780133969290/9780133969290_smallCoverImage.gif)
University Physics (14th Edition)
Physics
ISBN:
9780133969290
Author:
Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Introduction To Quantum Mechanics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781107189638/9781107189638_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Physics
ISBN:
9781107189638
Author:
Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
![Physics for Scientists and Engineers](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337553278/9781337553278_smallCoverImage.gif)
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics
ISBN:
9781337553278
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780321820464/9780321820464_smallCoverImage.gif)
Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy
Physics
ISBN:
9780321820464
Author:
Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina Brissenden
Publisher:
Addison-Wesley
![College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134609034/9780134609034_smallCoverImage.gif)
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio…
Physics
ISBN:
9780134609034
Author:
Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart Field
Publisher:
PEARSON