Assume that you have a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function over lotteries that give you and amount x if Event 1 happens and y if Event 1 does not happen: U(x, y) = p √x + (1-p) √y. (a) If p=0.5, calculate the utility of a lottery that gives you $10,000 if Event 1 happens and $100 if Event 1 does not happen. In addition, calculate the expected income of the lottery. (b) If you were sure to receive $4,900, what would your utility be? (Hint: If you receive $4,900 with certainty, then you receive $4,900 in both events.) (c) Calculate the certainty equivalent (CE) of receiving $10,000 if Event 1 happens and $100 if Event 1 does not happen. Draw a graph to explain your derivation. What is your risk premium?

Assume that you have a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function over lotteries that give you and amount x if Event 1 happens and y if Event 1 does not happen: U(x, y) = p √x + (1-p) √y. (a) If p=0.5, calculate the utility of a lottery that gives you $10,000 if Event 1 happens and $100 if Event 1 does not happen. In addition, calculate the expected income of the lottery. (b) If you were sure to receive $4,900, what would your utility be? (Hint: If you receive $4,900 with certainty, then you receive $4,900 in both events.) (c) Calculate the certainty equivalent (CE) of receiving $10,000 if Event 1 happens and $100 if Event 1 does not happen. Draw a graph to explain your derivation. What is your risk premium?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

4. Kate has von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function U(x1,x2) = m7. She currently has $2025. a. Would she be willing to undertake a gamble that involves a gain $2875 with probability + and a loss of $1125 with probability ? Show your work and explain your answer. b. Would she be willing to undertake a gamble that involves a gain $2599 with probability and a loss of $800 with probability ? Show your work and explain your answer.
Veer
Consider the lottery that assigns a probability T of obtaining a level of consumption CH and a probability 1-T an individual facing such a lottery with utility function u(c) that has the properties that more is better (that is, a strictly positive marginal utility of consumption at all levels of c) and diminishing marginal utility of consumption, u"(c) CL. Consider du(c) for the first derivative of the utility function with respect to dc du(c) du' (c) consumption and u"(c) (which is also the derivative of the first derivative of the utility function). to be the second derivative of the utility function dc dc2 1. Provide a definition for the certainty equivalent level of consumption for the simple lottery described above.
Consider the following money lotteries: ?1=(5/6,3000;1/6,500) ?2=(2/3,3000;1/3,500) ?3=(1/4,3000;1/4,2000;1/4,1000;1/4,500) ?4=(1/2,2000;1/2,1000) Leslie says that she is indifferent between lottery ?1 and getting $2000 for sure is indifferent between lottery ?2 and getting $1000 for sure prefers lottery ?3 over lottery ?4 Explain carefully whether or not Leslie is rational according to the theory of expected utility.
answer this properly, remember (0.35x50)+(0.65x10)=£24 here
An individual is oered a choice of either $50 or a lottery which may result in $0and $100, each with equal probability 1/2 . If the individual has a utility function u(w) = 5 + 2w, which one would they choose? If the individual has a utility function u(w) =w1/2 + 1?
1 Q1. Jerry has wealth of $60 and derives utility from this according to the utility function U(w) = 1 - Where w is his wealth. Jerry now finds a lottery ticket (the drawing takes place the next day) that offers a 50% chance of winning $5. W a) What is the expected value of Jerry if he takes the lottery ticket? (pay attention, it's not jerry's wealth) b) What is the minimum amount for which Jerry would be willing-to-sell the ticket? (Hint: sets a price of p, and at the minimum amount, the expected utility of selling and not selling should be the same) c) Which is bigger, your answer to (a) or (b), and suggest whether Jerry is a risk averse person based on the previous conclusion? d) If he does not sell the ticket, what is Jerry's cost of risk? (The cost of risk is the difference between the expected wealth and the certainty equivalence)
Consider the following claim: “If a decision maker prefers one given lottery that yields $x with probability 1 over another given lottery whose expected return is $x, then we can fully characterize the agent's risk attitude. That is, this information comparing two given lotteries is enough to determine if the decision maker is risk averse, risk loving or risk neutral.” If this claim is TRUE, then provide a proof. If it is FALSE, then prove your argument by providing an explanation.
Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain. b) What would be the highest price (premium) that she would be willing to pay for an insurance policy that fully insures her against the flooding damage?
1. ) Suppose a driver has a 6% of having one accident a year. In case of an accident the value of the car is reduced from $25,000 to $5,000. If driver buys an insurance policy the insurance company would completely cover damage to the car (essentially restoring its value to its initial level). Assume that the driver's utility function is U = VW. a) If price of the insurance policy (premium) is $1500, would this driver be willing to purchase the policy? Explain Show you computations b) What would be the maximum price a driver with 10% chance of accident be willing to pay for the insurance policy?