Assume that there are two parties, I and V. I engages in an activity that tends to injure V. V and both can take care to reduce the expected harm from accidents. Specifically, suppose that if I takes no care (i.e., spends $0 on accident precautions), expected injury to V is $250. If I spends $40 on accident precautions, however, the expected injury to V is reduced to $175. Further suppose that V has a choice between taking no care or spending $50 in care to avoid accidents. If V spends $50 in care, V's expected harm falls by $20 regardless of the level of care that I takes. Assume that courts adopt the socially-optimal level of injurer care as the negligence standard. That is, if I takes less than the socially-optimal level of care, she will be found negligent and must pay for all damages to V. If I takes at least the socially optimal level of care, she will not have to compensate V for his damages. 9. Under a negligence standard, what is l's dominant strategy? a) b) c) d) e) I does not have a dominant strategy. Spend $0 on precautions. Spend $40 on precautions. Spend $40 on precautions only if V takes no precautions. None of the above.

Assume that there are two parties, I and V. I engages in an activity that tends to injure V. V and both can take care to reduce the expected harm from accidents. Specifically, suppose that if I takes no care (i.e., spends $0 on accident precautions), expected injury to V is $250. If I spends $40 on accident precautions, however, the expected injury to V is reduced to $175. Further suppose that V has a choice between taking no care or spending $50 in care to avoid accidents. If V spends $50 in care, V's expected harm falls by $20 regardless of the level of care that I takes. Assume that courts adopt the socially-optimal level of injurer care as the negligence standard. That is, if I takes less than the socially-optimal level of care, she will be found negligent and must pay for all damages to V. If I takes at least the socially optimal level of care, she will not have to compensate V for his damages. 9. Under a negligence standard, what is l's dominant strategy? a) b) c) d) e) I does not have a dominant strategy. Spend $0 on precautions. Spend $40 on precautions. Spend $40 on precautions only if V takes no precautions. None of the above.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A polluter has abatement costs given by MAC = 405-0.15E, and the emissions cause damages given by MD = 0.1E. The government has a law that requires the polluter to pay for damages they cause, but they will only have to pay if the government catches the polluter emitting. If the polluter knows there is only a 68% chance that the government will catch the polluter, and they choose their optimal emission level, how much total damage will they cause? Answer: 30 The correct answer is: $ 172570.7
1
Use the following information for questions 12-14. Assume that there are two parties, I and V. I engages in an activity that tends to injure V. V and I both can take care to reduce the expected harm from accidents. Specifically, suppose that if I takes no care (i.e., spends $0 on accident precautions), expected injury to V is $25. If I spends $5 on accident precautions, however, the expected injury to V is reduced to $18. Further suppose that V has a choice between taking no care or spending $4 in care to avoid accidents. If V spends $4 in care, V’s expected harm falls by $2 regardless of the level of care that I takes. Assume that courts adopt the socially-optimal level of injurer care as the negligence standard. That is, if I takes less than the socially-optimal level of care, she will be found negligent and must pay for all damages to V. If I takes at least the socially optimal level of care, she will not have to compensate V for his damages. What is the Nash equilibrium of this…
Suppose Xavier has tickets to the Super Bowl, but is terribly ill with a noncontagious infection. How would a decision maker perform his economic calculation on whether to attend the game, based on the traditional model of risk behavior?
E2
d e and f please
Can Question 10 be answered?
Faris Co. and Fahad Co. are rivalry in Bahrain's market. Suppose the payoff to each of four strategic interactions are as follows: Faris Co. Response Action Reduce Price Don't Reduce Price Gain = BD 30,000 Reduce Price Loss = BD 1,000 Don't Reduce Price Loss = BD 5,000 No loss or gain The probability of Faris Co. to reduce price is 95 % (otherwise, probability of Faris Co. for not reducing price is 5 %), assume that Fahad Co. choose "reduce price" strategy a. What is size of loss from "reduce price" for Fahad Co.? b. What is size of gain from "don't reduce price" for Fahad Co? c. What is the expected payoff of a "reduce price" for Fahad Co.? and give an example (application) of d. Explain the concept of 'game theory' game theory Fahad Co. Response
help please answer in text form with proper workings and explanation for each and every part and steps with concept and introduction no AI no copy paste remember answer must be in proper format with all working
Question 5 Now, instead assume an individual has income of $100,000, a 10% chance of incurring a $75,000 accident, and a 20% chance of a $10,000 accident (and a 70% chance of no accident). The utility function is represented by U = C. What premium would be charged to provide full insurance coverage against all adverse states of the world? ers 9,500 9,500 (with margin: 0)
1
Next Friday, you plan to sell cakes at a bake sale to raise money for your school. You plan to charge $30 per cake, and you anticipate that you will sell 10 cakes. You can either purchase cakes to sell or bake them yourself. If you purchase the cakes, they will cost $25 each. If you bake your own cakes, your cost depends upon the number of cakes you bake, as shown in the table below. Number of cakes you bake Total cost of baked cakes ($) 0 0 1 10 2 22 3 36 4 52 5 70 6 90 7 112 8 136 9 162 10 190 a) How many cakes should you bake? How many cakes should you purchase? Bake ___ cake(s) and purchase ___ cake(s). b) Given your answer to part a, how much in total will the 10 cakes cost you? $ c) How much would it have cost you to bake all 10 cakes? $ d) How much would it have cost you to purchase all 10 cakes? $