ask 3 ========= Subtask b ------------ - Let ? be the set {true, false}. Then one can define the logical connectives ∨, ∧, →, ↔ as functions over the sets ? × ? → ? (taking in two arguments from the set ?, and returning an element from the set ?). It will then be an error if you try to give the functions something other than Boolean values. - You come to the right conclusion, but I think you have misunderstood the statement. Subtask b ------------ - Looks like you've reversed the numerator and denominator. - You don't really convince me with your argument. Can you see
Task 3 ========= Subtask b ------------ - Let ? be the set {true, false}. Then one can define the logical connectives ∨, ∧, →, ↔ as functions over the sets ? × ? → ? (taking in two arguments from the set ?, and returning an element from the set ?). It will then be an error if you try to give the functions something other than Boolean values. - You come to the right conclusion, but I think you have misunderstood the statement. Subtask b ------------ - Looks like you've reversed the numerator and denominator. - You don't really convince me with your argument. Can you see how you can make it clearer?
Here, in the question, we have to write the statements as a logical formula and also say if it is true or not, and then prove it or disprove it. We shall have a clear understanding of the concept of the odd number, prime numbers concept, and odd natural numbers concept. The concept is to be established based on the understanding of the numbers and logical formula which can be developed.
There must be logic and a formula for the numbers which can be established in a relation.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
