Apply Categorical Imperative/Universality 1. X could to Would I want all people, consistently, universally _?) (fill in the action only) Answer Yes or No. State your rationale. Example - Greg could study for the exam. Would I want all people, consistently, universally to study? Yes - Rationale - Studying/learning is a moral rule I would want all to follow. (See Kant Learning Activity) 2. Apply universality to every option. Example - Greg could cheat on the exam. Would I want all people, consistently, universally to cheat? No - Rationale - Cheating is not a moral rule I would want all to follow. (See Kant Learning Activity) 3, Apply universality to every option. 4. Apply universality to every option. Apply Respect (to remaining options) Is X exploiting someone (using someone for her own benefit) 1. X could means to an end for her own gain)? No (so this is a good option). Is X exploiting anyone (using someone as a
The Categorical Imperative is a moral principle proposed by a philosopher. It is based on the idea that actions should be evaluated based on whether they can be turned into a universal law, meaning that the same action should be acceptable if everyone were to do it in the same circumstances. Applying this principle can help us determine whether an action is ethical or not, as it requires us to consider the impact of our actions on others and on society as a whole.
In the case of Mario and Anthony, we can apply the Categorical Imperative to each of the options presented to determine whether they are ethical or not. By asking whether we would want everyone to act in the same way as the option suggests, we can evaluate the potential consequences of each action and determine which one is most ethical.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps