Type(s) of attributions emphasizedMostlyMostlydispositionalMixedsituationalTotal152123No psychtraining18.88590.238131427Psychdegree, butnot aLevel of17.2854psychologytrainingpsychologist0.6231322Psychologist7.4011.8417.76373.9410.1141.012Total304872150Part 2Answer the following to summarize the test of the hypothesis that the two variables level oftraining and type(s) of attributions emphasized are not associated. For your test, use the 0.0significance.(a) Determine the type of test statistic touse.Type of test statistic: (Choose one) ▼(b) Find the value of the test statistic. (Round to two or more decimal places.)(c) Find the p-value. (Round to three or more decimal places.)(d) Can we conclude that the variables level of psychology training andtype(s) of attributions emphasized are associated? Use the 0.05 level ofsignificance.O Yes O No You're driving along, listening to the car radio and following the rules of the road, when, all of a sudden, asilver sedan comes out of nowhere and darts in front of you, causing you to slam on your brakes and spillyour chicken nuggets all over the place."Why did that guy just cut me off?!?!?" Most of us, drivers and observers alike, would tend to attribute hisactions to "dispositional" factors: he's a terrible driver, he likes to scare people on the road, etc. We tend tooverlook the possible "situational" factors that may be contributing to his recklessness: he's rushing to thehospital, he just spilled his own chicken nuggets and temporarily lost control of the car, etc. Psychologistscall this tendency to attribute (often incorrectly) others' actions to dispositional factors rather than tosituational factors as the fundamental attribution error.We're interested in seeing if there's a difference in inclination to commit the fundamental attribution erroramong groups that differ in level of psychology training. We choose three groups of adults to participate instudy: adults who have no psychology training, adults who have a psychology degree but who are notpracticing psychologists, and adults who are practicing psychologists. We show each participant a videotapeon which a scenario similar to the one described above was enacted. Then we ask the participants questionabout why the characters in the enactment behaved as they did. We are examining the variables level ofpsychology training ("no psych training", "psych degree, but not a psychologist", and "psychologist") andtype(s) of attributions emphasized ("mostly situational", "mixed", and "mostly dispositional").Suppose that our data are those summarized in the contingency table below. Each cell of the table contaithree numbers: the first number is the observed cell frequency (fo), the second number is the expectedfrequency (fp) under the assumption that the two variables level of psychology training and type(s) ofattributions emphasized are not associated, and the third number is the following value.E(Observed cell frequencyExpected cell frequency )"SEExpected cell frequencyThe numbers labeled "Total" are totals for observed frequency.

a) Here, we need to check whether the variables level of psychology training and type of…

Answer the following to summarize the test of the hypothesis that the two variables leve training and type(s) of attributions emphasized are not associated. For your test, use the significance. (a) Determine the type of test statistic to use. Type of test statistic: (Choose one) (b) Find the value of the test statistic. (Round to two or more decimal places.) (c) Find the p-value. (Round to three or more decimal places.) d) Can we conclude that the variables level of psychology training and type(s) of attributions emphasized are associated? Use the 0.05 level of significance. Yes No