Anselm's argument for God's existence begins with an idea i.e. the essence of the greated being, whereas Aquinas' arguments begin with observations in the natural world which then point to a first efficient cause. In short, Anselm is ideal whereas Aquinas is natural. Explain how these two different views could demonstrate the way God affects the world.
Anselm's argument for God's existence begins with an idea i.e. the essence of the greated being, whereas Aquinas' arguments begin with observations in the natural world which then point to a first efficient cause. In short, Anselm is ideal whereas Aquinas is natural. Explain how these two different views could demonstrate the way God affects the world.
Related questions
Question
Anselm's argument for God's existence begins with an idea i.e. the essence of the greated being, whereas Aquinas' arguments begin with observations in the natural world which then point to a first efficient cause. In short, Anselm is ideal whereas Aquinas is natural.
Explain how these two different views could demonstrate the way God affects the world.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps