Andy and Cathy are in the sporting good industry. Andy has developed a new lightweight soccer goal and is trying to decide whether to sell it at a high price or a low price. Selling the good at a higher price will provide higher profits but might entice Cathy to develop and sell a competing lightweight soccer goal. A lower price could deter entry from Cathy. After Andy sets his price, Cathy must decide to enter the market for the new lightweight soccer goal or not. Assume that both Andy and Cathy must make at least $5,000 to make the investment worthwhile. Which price will Andy charge? high price low price What will Cathy do as a result of Andy's choice? Cathy will enter the market. O Cathy will not enter the market. Indicate each person's final profit. Andy's profit: $ 7000 Cathy's profit: $ 7000 Andy: charges high or low price Andy charges the high price Andy charges the low price Cathy: enter or do not enter Cathy: enter or do not enter Cathy Andy enters $9,000 Cathy does not enter Cathy enters Cathy does not enter Cathy $9,000 Andy Cathy $18,000 Andy Cathy $7,000 $7,000 Cathy Andy $14,000

Andy and Cathy are in the sporting good industry. Andy has developed a new lightweight soccer goal and is trying to decide whether to sell it at a high price or a low price. Selling the good at a higher price will provide higher profits but might entice Cathy to develop and sell a competing lightweight soccer goal. A lower price could deter entry from Cathy. After Andy sets his price, Cathy must decide to enter the market for the new lightweight soccer goal or not. Assume that both Andy and Cathy must make at least $5,000 to make the investment worthwhile. Which price will Andy charge? high price low price What will Cathy do as a result of Andy's choice? Cathy will enter the market. O Cathy will not enter the market. Indicate each person's final profit. Andy's profit: $ 7000 Cathy's profit: $ 7000 Andy: charges high or low price Andy charges the high price Andy charges the low price Cathy: enter or do not enter Cathy: enter or do not enter Cathy Andy enters $9,000 Cathy does not enter Cathy enters Cathy does not enter Cathy $9,000 Andy Cathy $18,000 Andy Cathy $7,000 $7,000 Cathy Andy $14,000

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Player 1 is an Internet service provider and Player 2 is a potential customer. They consider entering into a contract of service for a period of time. The provider decides between two levels of service: High or Low. The potential customer decides whether to Buy or Not Buy. When the potential customer calls customer service, the Internet service provider makes the initial offer.The potential customer then decides whether to Buy or Not Buy. Let’s say that the interaction ends after the potential customer makes their decision. Please set up the extensive form according to the following outcomes: i. If the Internet service provider offers Low and the potential customer doesn’t buy, they both make off with 1. ii. If the Internet service provider offers Low and the potential customer buys, the Internet service provider makes off with 3, and the customer receives 0. iii. If the Internet service provider offers High and the potential customer doesn’t buy, the Internet service provider makes…
Two technology companies, Bapple and Hoogle, are interested in attracting more software engineers to work and are considering introducing a personal shopper for employees as a new perk. The following game depicts the strategic outcomes that result from the game. Increases in annual profits of the two growing technology companies are shown in the table below. Bapple Offer the new perk Do not offer the new perk A $80 million B $10 million C Hoogle $60 million D $30 million Offer the new perk Hoogle = $20 million Bapple = $30 million Hoogle = $60 million Bapple = $10 million Refer to the Table. If both companies follow a dominant strategy, Bapple's annual profit will grow by Use letters in alphabetical order to select options Do not offer the new perk Hoogle = $5 million Bapple = $80 million Hoogle = $40 million Bapple = $60 million
Aspen is in house arrest and is not allowed to buy stuff online. She wants a new iPhone and is willing to pay up to $5000 dollars for it. You and I both pay $1000 to buy an iPhone (Assume she only has the option to buy from one of us). Which one of the following statement is true about how much Aspen will pay for the iPhone? Competition between us will lead Aspen to pay 1200 dollars for the iPhone Competition between us will lead Aspen to pay $5000 dollars for the iPhone Aspen will pay exactly $1350 for the iPhone because her demand is inelastic Aspen will pay $5000 dollars for the iPhone, only if we can collude
The bimatrix represents a simultaneous move game between Rowena and Colin. Rowena's payoff is the left number in each cell. ROWENA Up Down 0.25Left +0.75Right 0.65Left +0.35Right Find Colin's mixed strategy that makes Rowena indifferent between a pure strategy of playing Up and a pure strategy of playing Down. 0.5Left +0.5Right Left 1,16 2,20 0.45Left +0.55Right COLIN Right 4,6 3,40
A husband and wife would produce incomes Yh and Yw in their fallback situations. The utility each derives in any circumstance is just equal to his or her consumption expenditure in that circumstance. In their fallback situations, their consumption expenditure levels are just equal to their incomes. Thus their fallback levels of utility are Yh and Yw. If they cooperate, they produce Z>Yh + Yw. They engage in Nash cooperative bargaining to determine how to allocate Z across the consumption of the husband, Ch, and consumption of the wife, Cw, subject to the budget constraint that Ch + Cw = Z. Under any bargained allocation, the two would derive utilities of Ch and Cw. What do Ch and Cw equal if Yh = Yw (but this quantity is not equal to zero)? Please do fast ASAP fast
You work for a marketing firm that has just landed a contract with Run-of-the-Mills to help them promote three of their products: splishy splashers, flopsicles, and cannies. All of these products have been on the market for some time, but, to entice better sales, Run-of-the-Mills wants to try a new advertisement that will market two of the products that consumers will likely consume together. As a former economics student, you know that complements are typically consumed together while substitutes can take the place of other goods. Run-of-the-Mills provides your marketing firm with the following data: When the price of splishy splashers increases by 10%, the quantity of flopsicles sold decreases by 26% and the quantity of cannies sold increases by 14%. Your job is to use the cross-price elasticity between splishy splashers and the other goods to determine which goods your marketing firm should advertise together. Complete the first column of the following table by computing the…
Suppose that Lionel Messi is negotiating a contract with FC Barcelona. Messi has an offer from Real Madrid for $20 million a year. If he signs with FC Barcelona, they will earn $90 million in revenue from the signing. FC Barcelona's next best option is to sign Cristiano Ronaldo. They would earn $70 million from signing Ronaldo and would pay him a contract of $10 million. Messi's bargaining power is w = 1/2. a) What is the negotiated salary between Messi and FC Barcelona under Nash Bargaining? What is Messi's surplus and what is FČ Barcelona's surplus? b) Due to an injury, FC Barcelona would only earn $50 million from signing Ronaldo but everything else remains the same. What is the negotiated salary between Messi and FC Barcelona under Nash Bargaining? What is Messi's surplus and what is FC Barcelona's surplus?
Two neighborhood kids can play at home or walk to a nearby park. Playing with their toys yields some happiness. However, they would enjoy playing with the other kid at the park even more at the park. But each has a concern that if they go the park the other will not show up. This is an interesting game or situation because neither kid has an incentive to betray the other and not show up, but each kid fears walking to the park and having no one to play with. They also have to fear that if the other kid thinks they won't show up, that other kid will won't show up. All this strategic thinking is a lot for kids to take in. Here is the payoff matrix: Kid 1 Toys at Home Park Toys at Home Kid 2 Park How many Nash equilbria are there? 1,2,3 or 4 There is an option to let Kid 1 move first, but no option for Kid 2 to move first. Should Kid 2 let Kid 1 move first. Yes or No Blank # 1 Blank # 2
Frank and Nancy met at a sorority sock hop. They agreed to meet for a date at a local bar the next week. Regrettably, they were so fraught with passion that they forgot to agree on which bar would be the site of their rendezvous. Luckily, the town has only two bars, Rizotti's and the Oasis. Having discussed their tastes in bars at the sock hop, both are aware that Frank prefers Rizotti's to the Oasis and Nancy prefer the Oasis to Rizotti's. In fact, the payoffs are as follows. If both go to the Oasis, Nancy's utility is 3 and Frank's utility is 2. If both go to Rizotti's, Frank's utility is 3 and Nancy's utility is 2. If they don't both go to the same bar, both have a utility of 0. There are two Nash equilibrium in pure strategies and a Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies where the probability that Frank and Nancy go to the same bar is 12/25. This game has two Nash equilibria in pure strategies and a Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies where each person has a probability of 1/2 of…
5
Return to the game between Monica and Nancy in Exercise U10 in Chapter 5. Assume that Monica and Nancy choose their effort levels sequentially instead of simultaneously. Monica commits to her choice of effort level first. On observing this decision, Nancy commits to her own effort level. What is the subgame - perfect equilibrium of the game where the joint profits are 5m + 4n+ mn, the costs of their efforts to Monica and Nancy are m2 and n2, respectively, and Monica commits to an effort level first? Compare the payoffs to Monica and Nancy with those found in Exercise U10 in Chapter 5. Does this game have a first-mover or second - mover advantage? Using the same joint profit function as in part (a), find the subgame - perfect equilibrium for the game where Nancy must commit first to an effort level. U10. Return to the game between Monica and Nancy in Exercise U10 in Chapter 5. Assume that Monica and Nancy choose their effort levels sequentially instead of simultaneously. Monica commits…
Megan and Martha own competing hair salons that are in the same neighborhood. They are both considering offering their clients discounts in order to increase business. The payoff matrix shows their yearly incomes in thousands of dollars if they offer and do not offer discounts to their customers. Martha Megan Discount No Discount Discount $50, $75 $75, $60 No Discount $35, $90 $70, $85 If both Megan and Martha did not discount, what would each earn in yearly income? Megan would earn $50,000; Martha would earn $75,000. Megan would earn $75,000; Martha would earn $60,000. Megan would earn $35,000; Martha would earn $90,000. Megan would earn $70,000; Martha would earn $85,000. Megan would earn $35,000; Martha would earn $85,000.