An offer can be defined as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous. 1. Critically discuss this statement above, with the following requirements; a. Five (5) applicable case laws on the subject matter. b. State clearly The issue Basic facts of the Cases The Judgement

An offer can be defined as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous. 1. Critically discuss this statement above, with the following requirements; a. Five (5) applicable case laws on the subject matter. b. State clearly The issue Basic facts of the Cases The Judgement

Similar questions

The statute of limitations in Texas is a.four years for a written contract. b.four years for an oral contract for a 6-month lease. c.four years for all contracts for the sale or lease of real property in Texas. d.six years for a written contract.
What is the term for a minor choosing to proceed with the contract and the term for a minor choosing to void the contract? Select one: tion O a. disaffirmance & ratification O b. acceptance & appeal O C. acceptance & denial O d. execution & dismissal
16. Why are restrictive covenant clauses controversial? They are controversial because they allow people to create contract terms that restrict their future right to alter those same contracts They are controversial because they allow people to create contract terms below the otherwise legislated minimum standards of work They are controversial because they seem to pit two legitimate interest against each other: the right of trade against the right of contract
Able does not ever want Baker's shares to be transferred to Baker's brother, who has been convicted of criminal fraud and embezzlement on several occasions and who is currently serving time in a federal prison for one of those convictions. Which of the following types of restrictions on the transfer of Baker's shares might Able insist to accomplish this, even if Carter and Dennis don't share Able's concerns? Multiple Choice A put agreement Option agreement Provision disqualifying purchasers Buy-and-sell agreement Right of first refusal
Owe
Critically analyse the below proposal from the Financial Conduct Authority and critically evaluate the legal principles and regulations involved in preventing similar actions of greenwashing. < "FCA proposes new rules to tackle greenwashing Press Releases First published: 25/10/2022 < In a bid to clamp down on greenwashing, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is proposing a package of new measures including investment product sustainability labels and restrictions on how terms like 'ESG', 'green' or 'sustainable' can be used. < The measures are among several potential new rules which will protect consumers and improve trust in sustainable investment products. The work forms part of the commitment made in the FCA's ESG Strategy and Business Plan to build trust and integrity in ESG-labelled instruments, products and the supporting ecosystem. < There has been growth in the number of investment products marketed as 'green' or making wider sustainability claims. Exaggerated, misleading or…
Maranda says that she is fed up with the way a certain employer in Kennesaw treats employees and that she is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters. Although she is not a lawyer, Maranda believes that the offenses of the employer are so severe that a court will appreciate her attempt to make things better for the employees involved. Can Maranda act as plaintiff for the employees? Yes, so long as they file no objection Yes, so long as she gets permission slips from them No because venue is lacking No because she lacks standing Yes, so long as she gives any money he receives to them
Q1. To prevail in an action brought under common law, the plaintiff must show all of the following except: (in your response, explain the burdens of proof for a third-party plaintiff under common law). Q2. Kerry CPA is the auditor for Sammy Corp. During the audit, Kerry discovers a material misstatement in Sammy's financial statements. Sammy's management tells Kerry that if the misstatement is corrected or if Kerry issues an opinion that indicates there is a material misstatement, Sammy Corp. will likely have to declare bankruptcy and thousands of employees will lose their jobs. Which of the following statements is true if the misstatement is not corrected and Kerry issues an unqualified opinion on Sammy's financial statements? (in your response, identify the court case that makes Kerry liable to any person who suffered a loss as a result of the fraud).
A unilateral mistake occurs when a. both contracting parties share the same mistake. b. one party enters a contract under a mistaken assumption. c. one party makes a factually incorrect statement. d. one party makes false statementsto induce the other party to contract while knowing the words are false or being uncertain that they are true.
Anticipatory repudiation can occur in which of the following ways? I. A statement by one party of its intent not to perform. II. An action by the promisor that rendered performance impossible. III. Knowledge by the parties that one party may be unable to perform despite both parties' efforts. IV. After a contract has been discharged. Multiple Choice II and III. I and II. I and III. III and IV. I, II, and III.
29 of 75 If a buyer does not make inspections during the inspection period, the standard purchase and sale agreement automatically extends the inspection period unless the seller objects. requires the buyer to accept the property "as is." requires the seller to have the inspections performed at the buyer's expense. states that the closing date will be postponed subject to negotiation.
Which of the following statements is TRUE about an entrenching provision? Group of answer choices It must be altered by at least 75% of members present and voting. It can be amended by following the provisions of S.26(1) of the Companies Act. It can never be removed. It must be amended with the approval of all members.