An iodine-clock kinetics experiment was performed by varying the composition of reactant solutions and measuring the resulting rates of reaction. Trial 1 Trial 2 10.0 mL I¯(aq) 10.0 mL I¯(aq) Reactant solution A 5.0 mL S,0 (aq) 10.0 mL S,O (aq) 5.0 mL S,0 (aq) 5.0 mL S, 0 (aq) Reactant solution B 1.0 mL starch (aq) 1.0 mL starch (aq) Time to complete reaction 10 s 20 s How do trials 1 and 2 in the table differ? Trial 2 has twice as much S,O? as trial 1. Trial 1 has half as much starch as trial 2. Trial 2 has half as much S,O, as trial 1. Trial 1 has twice as much I- as trial 2. Four mechanisms have been proposed to explain the results in the table. Mechanism 1: I (aq) + I-(aq) L (aq) (slow) → L (aq) + S,0 (aq) → L (aq) + SO? (aq) (fast) Mechanism 2: I (aq) + S,0 (aq) → [S,O, · I]³ (aq) (slow) [S,O, · Ijš-(aq) +I(aq) → L,(aq) + 2 So (aq) (fast) > Mechanism 3: I (aq) + S,0; (aq)= [S,0, · I]3-(aq) (fast) [S,0, · IJ3-(aq) +I(aq) → L (aq) + 2 SO (aq) (slow) Mechanism 4: 21- (aq) + S,0 (aq) → 1, (aq) + 2 So (aq) Of the proposed mechanisms, which would be supported by the results in the table? O mechanism 1 O mechanism 2 mechanism 3 O mechanism 4 O O O O
An iodine-clock kinetics experiment was performed by varying the composition of reactant solutions and measuring the resulting rates of reaction. Trial 1 Trial 2 10.0 mL I¯(aq) 10.0 mL I¯(aq) Reactant solution A 5.0 mL S,0 (aq) 10.0 mL S,O (aq) 5.0 mL S,0 (aq) 5.0 mL S, 0 (aq) Reactant solution B 1.0 mL starch (aq) 1.0 mL starch (aq) Time to complete reaction 10 s 20 s How do trials 1 and 2 in the table differ? Trial 2 has twice as much S,O? as trial 1. Trial 1 has half as much starch as trial 2. Trial 2 has half as much S,O, as trial 1. Trial 1 has twice as much I- as trial 2. Four mechanisms have been proposed to explain the results in the table. Mechanism 1: I (aq) + I-(aq) L (aq) (slow) → L (aq) + S,0 (aq) → L (aq) + SO? (aq) (fast) Mechanism 2: I (aq) + S,0 (aq) → [S,O, · I]³ (aq) (slow) [S,O, · Ijš-(aq) +I(aq) → L,(aq) + 2 So (aq) (fast) > Mechanism 3: I (aq) + S,0; (aq)= [S,0, · I]3-(aq) (fast) [S,0, · IJ3-(aq) +I(aq) → L (aq) + 2 SO (aq) (slow) Mechanism 4: 21- (aq) + S,0 (aq) → 1, (aq) + 2 So (aq) Of the proposed mechanisms, which would be supported by the results in the table? O mechanism 1 O mechanism 2 mechanism 3 O mechanism 4 O O O O
Chemistry
10th Edition
ISBN:9781305957404
Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Chapter1: Chemical Foundations
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ: Define and explain the differences between the following terms. a. law and theory b. theory and...
Related questions
Question
![An iodine-clock kinetics experiment was performed by varying the composition of reactant solutions and measuring the
resulting rates of reaction.
Trial 1
Trial 2
10.0 mL I¯(aq)
10.0 mL I¯(aq)
Reactant solution A
5.0 mL S,0 (aq)
10.0 mL S,O (aq)
5.0 mL S,O (aq)
5.0 mL S,0 (aq)
Reactant solution B
1.0 mL starch (aq)
1.0 mL starch (aq)
Time to complete reaction
10 s
20 s
How do trials 1 and 2 in the table differ?
Trial 2 has twice as much S, O? as trial 1.
Trial 1 has half as much starch as trial 2.
Trial 2 has half as much S,O as trial 1.
Trial 1 has twice as much I- as trial 2.
Four mechanisms have been proposed to explain the results in the table.
Mechanism 1:
I(aq) + I-(aq) →
→ L (aq)
(slow)
L (aq) + S,0 (aq) → L (aq) + SO? (aq)
(fast)
Mechanism 2:
I (aq) + S,0 (aq) → [S,0, · I]³ (aq)
(slow)
[S,O, · Ijš-(aq) +I(aq) → L, (aq) + 2 So (aq)
(fast)
Mechanism 3:
I (aq) + S,O (aq) = [S,0; · I]³¯(aq)
(fast)
[S,Og · Ij3-(aq) +I¯(aq)
L (aq) + 2 SO (aq)
(slow)
Mechanism 4:
21- (aq) + S,0 (aq) → 1, (aq) + 2 So (aq)
Of the proposed mechanisms, which would be supported by the results in the table?
mechanism 1
O mechanism 2
mechanism 3
mechanism 4
O O O O](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fccb0a67c-7b5d-4f1e-af1f-c2b0cff9c8af%2F09375268-4912-4f08-b57a-02c7616cd24b%2Fb8az21a_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:An iodine-clock kinetics experiment was performed by varying the composition of reactant solutions and measuring the
resulting rates of reaction.
Trial 1
Trial 2
10.0 mL I¯(aq)
10.0 mL I¯(aq)
Reactant solution A
5.0 mL S,0 (aq)
10.0 mL S,O (aq)
5.0 mL S,O (aq)
5.0 mL S,0 (aq)
Reactant solution B
1.0 mL starch (aq)
1.0 mL starch (aq)
Time to complete reaction
10 s
20 s
How do trials 1 and 2 in the table differ?
Trial 2 has twice as much S, O? as trial 1.
Trial 1 has half as much starch as trial 2.
Trial 2 has half as much S,O as trial 1.
Trial 1 has twice as much I- as trial 2.
Four mechanisms have been proposed to explain the results in the table.
Mechanism 1:
I(aq) + I-(aq) →
→ L (aq)
(slow)
L (aq) + S,0 (aq) → L (aq) + SO? (aq)
(fast)
Mechanism 2:
I (aq) + S,0 (aq) → [S,0, · I]³ (aq)
(slow)
[S,O, · Ijš-(aq) +I(aq) → L, (aq) + 2 So (aq)
(fast)
Mechanism 3:
I (aq) + S,O (aq) = [S,0; · I]³¯(aq)
(fast)
[S,Og · Ij3-(aq) +I¯(aq)
L (aq) + 2 SO (aq)
(slow)
Mechanism 4:
21- (aq) + S,0 (aq) → 1, (aq) + 2 So (aq)
Of the proposed mechanisms, which would be supported by the results in the table?
mechanism 1
O mechanism 2
mechanism 3
mechanism 4
O O O O
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
![Chemistry](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305957404/9781305957404_smallCoverImage.gif)
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305957404
Author:
Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Chemistry](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259911156/9781259911156_smallCoverImage.gif)
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781259911156
Author:
Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Principles of Instrumental Analysis](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305577213/9781305577213_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305577213
Author:
Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Chemistry](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305957404/9781305957404_smallCoverImage.gif)
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305957404
Author:
Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Chemistry](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259911156/9781259911156_smallCoverImage.gif)
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781259911156
Author:
Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Principles of Instrumental Analysis](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305577213/9781305577213_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305577213
Author:
Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Organic Chemistry](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780078021558/9780078021558_smallCoverImage.gif)
Organic Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9780078021558
Author:
Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Chemistry: Principles and Reactions](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305079373/9781305079373_smallCoverImage.gif)
Chemistry: Principles and Reactions
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305079373
Author:
William L. Masterton, Cecile N. Hurley
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781118431221/9781118431221_smallCoverImage.gif)
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind…
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781118431221
Author:
Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. Bullard
Publisher:
WILEY