All of these are elements of Crosby’s argument, except which one? it was particularly baffling that Europeans were more successful in Americas and Pacific World but less successful in Africa and Asia for a country to overcome its many biological constraints – food, shelter, fuel – for survival, it would need to exploit other countries’ resources European joint-stock companies and international banking were an unconvincing argument for European succes most other countries outside of European had expanded into empires and industrialized long before Europe but didn’t take over other parts of the world
All of these are elements of Crosby’s argument, except which one? it was particularly baffling that Europeans were more successful in Americas and Pacific World but less successful in Africa and Asia for a country to overcome its many biological constraints – food, shelter, fuel – for survival, it would need to exploit other countries’ resources European joint-stock companies and international banking were an unconvincing argument for European succes most other countries outside of European had expanded into empires and industrialized long before Europe but didn’t take over other parts of the world
Related questions
Question
-
All of these are elements of Crosby’s argument, except which one?
it was particularly baffling that Europeans were more successful in Americas and Pacific World but less successful in Africa and Asia
for a country to overcome its many biological constraints – food, shelter, fuel – for survival, it would need to exploit other countries’ resources
European joint-stock companies and international banking were an unconvincing argument for European succes
most other countries outside of European had expanded into empires and industrialized long before Europe but didn’t take over other parts of the world
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
