All of these are elements of Crosby’s argument, except which one? it was particularly baffling that Europeans were more successful in Americas and Pacific World but less successful in Africa and Asia for a country to overcome its many biological constraints – food, shelter, fuel – for survival, it would need to exploit other countries’ resources European joint-stock companies and international banking were an unconvincing argument for European succes most other countries outside of European had expanded into empires and industrialized long before Europe but didn’t take over other parts of the world

All of these are elements of Crosby’s argument, except which one? it was particularly baffling that Europeans were more successful in Americas and Pacific World but less successful in Africa and Asia for a country to overcome its many biological constraints – food, shelter, fuel – for survival, it would need to exploit other countries’ resources European joint-stock companies and international banking were an unconvincing argument for European succes most other countries outside of European had expanded into empires and industrialized long before Europe but didn’t take over other parts of the world

		it was particularly baffling that Europeans were more successful in Americas and Pacific World but less successful in Africa and Asia
		for a country to overcome its many biological constraints – food, shelter, fuel – for survival, it would need to exploit other countries’ resources
		European joint-stock companies and international banking were an unconvincing argument for European succes
		most other countries outside of European had expanded into empires and industrialized long before Europe but didn’t take over other parts of the world