Algorithm: The algorithm to determine the equivalent remarks of a faculty's evaluation score is: 1. Get the name of the faculty. 2. Get the evaluation score of the faculty. 3. Test the score if it is greater than or equal to 4.50. 4. If the score is greater than or equal to 4.50, remarks are "Outstanding". However, if the score is less than 4.50, proceed to step 5. 5. Test the score if it is greater than or equal to 4.00. 6. If the score is greater than or equal to 4.00, remarks are "Very Satisfactory". However, if the score is less than 4.00, proceed to step 7. 7. Test the score if it is greater than or equal to 3.50. 8. If the score is greater than or equal to 3.50, remarks are "Satisfactory". However, if the score is less than 3.50, proceed to step 9. 9. Test the score if it is greater than or equal to 3.00. 10. If the score is greater than or equal to 3.00, remarks are "Needs Improvement". However, if the score is less than 3.00, remarks are" Poor".

Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (7th Edition)
7th Edition
ISBN:9780133594140
Author:James Kurose, Keith Ross
Publisher:James Kurose, Keith Ross
Chapter1: Computer Networks And The Internet
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem R1RQ: What is the difference between a host and an end system? List several different types of end...
icon
Related questions
Question

Please use dev c++ programmer to encode this problem, then show it to me! Thank you :)

Algorithm:
The algorithm to determine the equivalent remarks of a faculty's evaluation score is:
1. Get the name of the faculty.
2. Get the evaluation score of the faculty.
3. Test the score if it is greater than or equal to 4.50.
4. If the score is greater than or equal to 4.50, remarks are "Outstanding". However, if
the score is less than 4.50, proceed to step 5.
5. Test the score if it is greater than or equal to 4.00.
6. If the score is greater than or equal to 4.00, remarks are "Very Satisfactory".
However, if the score is less than 4.00, proceed to step 7.
7. Test the score if it is greater than or equal to 3.50.
8. If the score is greater than or equal to 3.50, remarks are "Satisfactory". However, if
the score is less than 3.50, proceed to step 9.
9. Test the score if it is greater than or equal to 3.00.
10. If the score is greater than or equal to 3.00, remarks are "Needs Improvement".
However, if the score is less than 3.00, remarks are" Poor".
11. Display the faculty name, evaluation score, and remarks.
Transcribed Image Text:Algorithm: The algorithm to determine the equivalent remarks of a faculty's evaluation score is: 1. Get the name of the faculty. 2. Get the evaluation score of the faculty. 3. Test the score if it is greater than or equal to 4.50. 4. If the score is greater than or equal to 4.50, remarks are "Outstanding". However, if the score is less than 4.50, proceed to step 5. 5. Test the score if it is greater than or equal to 4.00. 6. If the score is greater than or equal to 4.00, remarks are "Very Satisfactory". However, if the score is less than 4.00, proceed to step 7. 7. Test the score if it is greater than or equal to 3.50. 8. If the score is greater than or equal to 3.50, remarks are "Satisfactory". However, if the score is less than 3.50, proceed to step 9. 9. Test the score if it is greater than or equal to 3.00. 10. If the score is greater than or equal to 3.00, remarks are "Needs Improvement". However, if the score is less than 3.00, remarks are" Poor". 11. Display the faculty name, evaluation score, and remarks.
OMNIA
ULO-1c: Task 3
Create pseudocode and flowchart that will accept the evaluation score of a faculty and
determine its equivalent remarks. Remarks are based on the following criteria:
4.50 - 5.00 -
Outstanding
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Poor
4.00 – 4.49 -
3.50 - 3.99 -
3.00 – 3.49 -
2.99 below -
Transcribed Image Text:OMNIA ULO-1c: Task 3 Create pseudocode and flowchart that will accept the evaluation score of a faculty and determine its equivalent remarks. Remarks are based on the following criteria: 4.50 - 5.00 - Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Needs Improvement Poor 4.00 – 4.49 - 3.50 - 3.99 - 3.00 – 3.49 - 2.99 below -
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (7th Edi…
Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (7th Edi…
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9780133594140
Author:
James Kurose, Keith Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON
Computer Organization and Design MIPS Edition, Fi…
Computer Organization and Design MIPS Edition, Fi…
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9780124077263
Author:
David A. Patterson, John L. Hennessy
Publisher:
Elsevier Science
Network+ Guide to Networks (MindTap Course List)
Network+ Guide to Networks (MindTap Course List)
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9781337569330
Author:
Jill West, Tamara Dean, Jean Andrews
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Concepts of Database Management
Concepts of Database Management
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9781337093422
Author:
Joy L. Starks, Philip J. Pratt, Mary Z. Last
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Prelude to Programming
Prelude to Programming
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9780133750423
Author:
VENIT, Stewart
Publisher:
Pearson Education
Sc Business Data Communications and Networking, T…
Sc Business Data Communications and Networking, T…
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9781119368830
Author:
FITZGERALD
Publisher:
WILEY