aken together, the two sources best support which oh the following conclusions regarding the situation in British India in 1940?

icon
Related questions
Question
Taken together, the two sources best support which oh the following conclusions regarding the situation in British India in 1940?
Taken together, the two sources best support which of the following
conclusions regarding the situation in British India in 1940? *
1 point
Source 1:
"The British... have for many decades had settled notions about India's future. Their concept of party
government and parliamentary rule has become the ideal with them as the best form of government for every
country. ...
It is extremely difficult to appreciate why our Hindu friends fail to understand the real nature of Islam and
Hinduism. It is only a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality. This
misconception of one Indian nation will lead India to destruction if we fail to revise our notions in time. The
Hindus and Muslims in India belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, literatures..
They have different epics and different heroes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other. To yoke
together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must
lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be built up for the government of such
a state."
Muhammad Ali Jinnah, leader of the All-India Muslim League, an
organization of Indian Muslims that had split from the Indian National
Congress, address to a meeting of the League, March 1940
Source 2:
"We, the inhabitants of India, have one thing in common and that is our India-ness, which we share despite
our religious and cultural differences. Just as our different features and personalities do not affect our
common humanity, so our religious and cultural differences should not interfere with our shared association
with our homeland. Therefore, like other religious groups in India, we Muslims have a duty to struggle for
the attainment of our common Indian interests and fight against the evils that hamper our common progress
and prosperity. This is what I mean when I speak of a common nationhood of all Indians. The [Indian
National] Congress, having the same position as ours, has made provisions for the protection of all religions,
cultures, and languages in a future Indian state.
On the other hand, the European concept of nationalism is unacceptable to our organization. We denounce it
and are totally against it."
Husain Ahmad Madani, leader of the Council of Indian Muslim Religious
Scholars, address to the annual meeting of the organization, June 1940
There was a clear difference between Hindu and Muslim visions of what postwar
India should be
Indian Muslim religious scholars rejected Gandhi's emphasis on nonviolence to
achieve political change
Indian opposition to British rule involved groups pursuing very different political goals
The British skillfully manipulated religious tensions within India to rally support for the
imperial war effort
Transcribed Image Text:Taken together, the two sources best support which of the following conclusions regarding the situation in British India in 1940? * 1 point Source 1: "The British... have for many decades had settled notions about India's future. Their concept of party government and parliamentary rule has become the ideal with them as the best form of government for every country. ... It is extremely difficult to appreciate why our Hindu friends fail to understand the real nature of Islam and Hinduism. It is only a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality. This misconception of one Indian nation will lead India to destruction if we fail to revise our notions in time. The Hindus and Muslims in India belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, literatures.. They have different epics and different heroes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other. To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be built up for the government of such a state." Muhammad Ali Jinnah, leader of the All-India Muslim League, an organization of Indian Muslims that had split from the Indian National Congress, address to a meeting of the League, March 1940 Source 2: "We, the inhabitants of India, have one thing in common and that is our India-ness, which we share despite our religious and cultural differences. Just as our different features and personalities do not affect our common humanity, so our religious and cultural differences should not interfere with our shared association with our homeland. Therefore, like other religious groups in India, we Muslims have a duty to struggle for the attainment of our common Indian interests and fight against the evils that hamper our common progress and prosperity. This is what I mean when I speak of a common nationhood of all Indians. The [Indian National] Congress, having the same position as ours, has made provisions for the protection of all religions, cultures, and languages in a future Indian state. On the other hand, the European concept of nationalism is unacceptable to our organization. We denounce it and are totally against it." Husain Ahmad Madani, leader of the Council of Indian Muslim Religious Scholars, address to the annual meeting of the organization, June 1940 There was a clear difference between Hindu and Muslim visions of what postwar India should be Indian Muslim religious scholars rejected Gandhi's emphasis on nonviolence to achieve political change Indian opposition to British rule involved groups pursuing very different political goals The British skillfully manipulated religious tensions within India to rally support for the imperial war effort
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer