Advocates for organic farming claim that their methods result in a number of benefits to farmers, consumers, and the environment. Scientists now plan to study the claims that organic farming advocates make by developing testable hypotheses about the economic and environmental benefits of growing organic foods. The scientists plan to collect data from farmers and other producers. which hypothesis should the scientists use? Hypothesis: Per hectare of farm land, profits from organic farming are comparable to those of conventional farming when costs of fertilizers, seeds, pesticides, and air quality are factored in. O Hypothesis: Per hectare of farm land, profits from organic farming are comparable to those of conventional farming when costs of fertilizers, seeds, pesticides, and soll quality are factored in Hypothesis: Per hectare of farm land, profits from organic farming are comparable to those of conventional farming when costs of fertilizers, seeds, pesticides, and local water quality are factored in

Applications and Investigations in Earth Science (9th Edition)
9th Edition
ISBN:9780134746241
Author:Edward J. Tarbuck, Frederick K. Lutgens, Dennis G. Tasa
Publisher:Edward J. Tarbuck, Frederick K. Lutgens, Dennis G. Tasa
Chapter1: The Study Of Minerals
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1LR
icon
Related questions
Question
Is
Brushing up on the Basics: An Introduction to Science Process
The key to a good hypothesis is that it can be tested in some practical way that shows whether the hypothesis is consistent with the data collected or
is false. A farcical example helps: one could hypothesize that the moon is made of cheese, but that hypothesis has no value unless one can test in
some meaningful, objective way whether it is false. Scientific hypotheses have to be both testable and falsifiable with tools and observations available.
Advocates for organic farming claim that their methods result in a number of benefits to farmers, consumers, and the environment. Scientists now
plan to study the claims that organic farming advocates make by developing testable hypotheses about the economic and environmental benefits of
growing organic foods. The scientists plan to collect data from farmers and other producers.
which hypothesis should the scientists use?
Hypothesis: Per hectare of farm land, profits from organic farming are comparable to those of conventional farming when costs of
fertilizers, seeds, pesticides, and air quality are factored in.
O Hypothesis: Per hectare of farm land, profits from organic farming are comparable to those of conventional farming when costs of
fertilizers, seeds, pesticides, and soll quality are factored in,
Hypothesis: Per hectare of farm land, profits from organic farming are comparable to those of conventional farming when costs of
fertilizers, seeds, pesticides, and local water quality are factored in
O
X
Transcribed Image Text:Is Brushing up on the Basics: An Introduction to Science Process The key to a good hypothesis is that it can be tested in some practical way that shows whether the hypothesis is consistent with the data collected or is false. A farcical example helps: one could hypothesize that the moon is made of cheese, but that hypothesis has no value unless one can test in some meaningful, objective way whether it is false. Scientific hypotheses have to be both testable and falsifiable with tools and observations available. Advocates for organic farming claim that their methods result in a number of benefits to farmers, consumers, and the environment. Scientists now plan to study the claims that organic farming advocates make by developing testable hypotheses about the economic and environmental benefits of growing organic foods. The scientists plan to collect data from farmers and other producers. which hypothesis should the scientists use? Hypothesis: Per hectare of farm land, profits from organic farming are comparable to those of conventional farming when costs of fertilizers, seeds, pesticides, and air quality are factored in. O Hypothesis: Per hectare of farm land, profits from organic farming are comparable to those of conventional farming when costs of fertilizers, seeds, pesticides, and soll quality are factored in, Hypothesis: Per hectare of farm land, profits from organic farming are comparable to those of conventional farming when costs of fertilizers, seeds, pesticides, and local water quality are factored in O X
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Applications and Investigations in Earth Science …
Applications and Investigations in Earth Science …
Earth Science
ISBN:
9780134746241
Author:
Edward J. Tarbuck, Frederick K. Lutgens, Dennis G. Tasa
Publisher:
PEARSON
Exercises for Weather & Climate (9th Edition)
Exercises for Weather & Climate (9th Edition)
Earth Science
ISBN:
9780134041360
Author:
Greg Carbone
Publisher:
PEARSON
Environmental Science
Environmental Science
Earth Science
ISBN:
9781260153125
Author:
William P Cunningham Prof., Mary Ann Cunningham Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Earth Science (15th Edition)
Earth Science (15th Edition)
Earth Science
ISBN:
9780134543536
Author:
Edward J. Tarbuck, Frederick K. Lutgens, Dennis G. Tasa
Publisher:
PEARSON
Environmental Science (MindTap Course List)
Environmental Science (MindTap Course List)
Earth Science
ISBN:
9781337569613
Author:
G. Tyler Miller, Scott Spoolman
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Physical Geology
Physical Geology
Earth Science
ISBN:
9781259916823
Author:
Plummer, Charles C., CARLSON, Diane H., Hammersley, Lisa
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,