According to the source, what was the main cause of the economic crisis that South Africa was experiencing in the 1970s and 1980s?

icon
Related questions
Question

1.2.1

According to the source, what was the main cause of the economic crisis that South Africa was experiencing in the 1970s and 1980s?

1.2.2

Briefly explain why the "total onslaught" policy required militarisation?

1.2.3

List THREE expenses due to the militarisation as required by the policy of "total onslaught". 

SOURCE 1B
This source presents an extract from an article, An overview of the South African
economy in the 1980s, that was published in the September 1994 South African
Journal of Economic History.
The declining growth rate, which had been such a notable feature of the South
African economy in the 1970s, continued in the 1980s until, by the end of the decade,
slow growth had been replaced by no growth. The declining price of gold played its
part, as did the continued ravages of inflation, but they were not the main causes.
The credit for this achievement must go to the government. It was the P.W. Botha
regime that brought down the economy.
This demolition was brought about by the growing costs of the "total onslaught"
policy and the extraordinary militarisation that it entailed. White conscription rose to
two years, with up to three months on active duty every year for almost 20 years.
Vast amounts of money were poured into ammunitions manufacturing, as the
government and its generals fantasised about building aeroplanes, helicopters,
submarines, warships, tanks, over and above the armoured cars and special guns
developed for the ongoing bush war. An atomic device was produced at great
expense, with no thought as to its use - which must have been nil. Not even the P.W.
Botha government can have thought they could challenge the might of the Soviet
Union with their inadequate nuclear capability or even possibly use it on the home
front against freedom fighters or terrorists.
It was made worse, too, by the manner in which homelands were granted
"independence" without any effective control over their expenditures. As a result, the
South African government found itself having to pour billions of rands into
subsidising corrupt and inefficient homeland governments without proper
accountability. The depreciation of the rand was inevitable.
Transcribed Image Text:SOURCE 1B This source presents an extract from an article, An overview of the South African economy in the 1980s, that was published in the September 1994 South African Journal of Economic History. The declining growth rate, which had been such a notable feature of the South African economy in the 1970s, continued in the 1980s until, by the end of the decade, slow growth had been replaced by no growth. The declining price of gold played its part, as did the continued ravages of inflation, but they were not the main causes. The credit for this achievement must go to the government. It was the P.W. Botha regime that brought down the economy. This demolition was brought about by the growing costs of the "total onslaught" policy and the extraordinary militarisation that it entailed. White conscription rose to two years, with up to three months on active duty every year for almost 20 years. Vast amounts of money were poured into ammunitions manufacturing, as the government and its generals fantasised about building aeroplanes, helicopters, submarines, warships, tanks, over and above the armoured cars and special guns developed for the ongoing bush war. An atomic device was produced at great expense, with no thought as to its use - which must have been nil. Not even the P.W. Botha government can have thought they could challenge the might of the Soviet Union with their inadequate nuclear capability or even possibly use it on the home front against freedom fighters or terrorists. It was made worse, too, by the manner in which homelands were granted "independence" without any effective control over their expenditures. As a result, the South African government found itself having to pour billions of rands into subsidising corrupt and inefficient homeland governments without proper accountability. The depreciation of the rand was inevitable.
Expert Solution
Step 1
“Since you have asked multiple questions, we will solve the first question for you. If you want any specific question to be solved, then please specify the question number or post only that question.”
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer