ABC Company produces 10,000 units per month. The unit is sold in the market for $2. The labor costs the company $5,000 per month. The material to produce the required quantity costs them $1,000. The overhead cost for the company is $3,000. Calculate the multifactor productivity for the company.

ABC Company produces 10,000 units per month. The unit is sold in the market for $2. The labor costs the company $5,000 per month. The material to produce the required quantity costs them $1,000. The overhead cost for the company is $3,000. Calculate the multifactor productivity for the company.

Marketing

20th Edition

ISBN:9780357033791

Author:Pride, William M

Publisher:Pride, William M

Chapter19: Pricing Concepts

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6DRQ

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Q: Develope a productivity measure for a product that utilizes labor machine time, raw materials and…

A: Details given: Units produced = 10,000 Labour hours used = 400 Selling price = $ 11/unit labor rate…

Q: 1.1 Chuck Sox makes wooden boxes in which to ship motorcycles. Chuck and his three employees invest…

A: Total Hours per day = H = 40 hours Number of boxes per day = B1 = 120 boxes Number of boxes per day…

Q: Problem 2 You have just been given the following production data for 2010 and 2011. Calculate the…

A: 20102011OutputSales$400,000$480,000InputLabor$50,000$60,000Capital$100,000$110,000Energy$8,000$9,500…

Q: A company noticed that there is an increase in ustomers returning of faulty products. What would be…

A: A product defect is any attribute of a product that foils its ease of use for the reason for which…

Q: Develope a productivity measure for a product that utilizes labor machine time, Raw materials and…

Q: A crew that installs carpet has the following output in each of the last 2 weeks. this week: 600…

A: Productivity is the ratio of output to input.

Q: Apex Brothers builds birdhouses for its customers. The average birdhouse is priced at $30. Labor…

A: Step1: Calculating the value of labour productivity. We have,Labour productivity is the ratio of…

Q: opm please help....

A: Productivity measures how efficiently we use resources to produce goods or services. It shows the…

Q: Calculate the labor productivities for each week. Fill in the table below (enter your responses…

A: Here, for one week, I have been given the output data in units and the labour hours, I would…

Q: A manager checked production records and found that a worker produced 200 units while working 40…

A: Productivity is measured as the units of output that a worker produces per hour. Mathematically,…

Q: A caterer prepares 2,000 meals for a client’ company event consuming the following resources: Labor…

A: Total output (O)= 2000 meal Number of working hour (N)= 6 hr Calculate Labor productivity Labor…

Q: A cleaning company cleans 100 houses per month and uses S10 of chemicals, S35 of labor, and $5 of…

A: Given : Total no. of houses cleaned by company per month = 100 Use of Chemical=$10 Use of labor=$35…

Q: Bear Lake Seafood produces 782 boxes of seafood per day. There are 3 working shifts, each is 5-hour.…

A: 782 boxes seafood per day 3 working shifts=5*3=15 hours 25 employs per shift Utility cost=$67

Q: What is the labor productivity? What is the overhead productivity? What is the multifactor…

A: Labor productivity refers to the per hour productivity of the labor computed engaged in the any…

Q: A wrapping box company manufactures 4500 rolls of the wrapped box in a week. The SP is €23 and the…

A: Productivity is the ability to produce finished goods and services effectively and efficiently in a…

Q: Bear Lake Seafood produces 573 boxes of seafood per day. There are two working shifts, each is…

A: Find the given details below: Given Details: Production (output) 573 Boxes per day Working…

Q: Explain the meaning of the saying that productivity is a relative measure briefly .

A: Productivity can be defined as the overall measure of the ability to produce a good or a service.…

Q: Can labor productivity be calculated using the following formula: Labor productivity= unites…

A: Determine whether the given formula can be used to calculate labor productivity:The given formula is…

Concept explainers

Overall Equipment Effectiveness

Overall equipment effectiveness or OEE as it is known can be defined as a widely standard to measure manufacturing productivity. In other words, it can also be defined as the exact percentage of time which is productive. If the score of overall equipment effectiveness is 100%, it is an indication that only good parts are being manufactured with no stop time. Hence OEE of 100% means 100% quality, performance & also availability.

Question

Q- ABC Company produces 10,000 units per month. The unit is sold in the market for $2. The labor costs the company $5,000 per month. The material to produce the required quantity costs them $1,000. The overhead cost for the company is $3,000. Calculate the multifactor productivity for the company.

Expert Solution

This question has been solved!

Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.

This is a popular solution!

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Step 1: Given variables:

VIEW

Step 2: Calculate productivity

VIEW

Solution

VIEW

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions

Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
Explain what satisficing is and when it may be a good strategy.
When the idea first occurred to her, it seemed like such a win-win situation. Now she wasn't so sure. Marge Brygay was a hardworking sales rep for Inspire Learning Corporation, a company intent on becoming the top educational software provider in five years. That newly adopted strategic goal translated into an ambitious, million-dollar sales target for each of Inspire's sales reps. At the beginning of the fiscal year, her share of the sales department's operational goal seemed entirely reasonable to Marge. She believed in Inspire's products. The company had developed innovative, highly regarded math, language, science, and social studies programs for the K— 12 market. What set the software apart was a foundation in truly cutting-edge research. Marge had seen for herself how Inspire programs could engage whole classrooms Of normally unmotivated kids; the significant rise in scores on those increasingly important standardized tests bore Out her subjective impressions. Bur now, just days before the end of the year, Marge's sales were $1,000 short of her million-dollar goal. The sale that would have put her comfortably over the top fell through due to last-minute cuts in one large school system's budget. At first, she was nearly overwhelmed with frustration, but then it occurred to her that if she contributed $1,000 to Central High, the inner-city high school in her territory probably most in need of what she had for sale, they could purchase the software and put her over the top. Her scheme would certainly benefit Central High students. Achieving her sales goal would make Inspire happy, and it wouldn't do her any harm, either professionally or financially. Making the goal would earn her a $10,000 bonus check that would come in handy when the time came to write out that first tuition check for her oldest child, who had just been accepted to a well-known, private university. Initially, it seemed like the perfect solution all the way around. The more she thought about it, however, the more it didn't quite sit well with her conscience. Time was running out. She needed to decide what to do. 1. Donate the $1,000 to Central High, and consider the $10,000 bonus a good return on your investment.
Scenario 3 Ben Gibson, the purchasing manager at Coastal Products, was reviewing purchasing expenditures for packaging materials with Jeff Joyner. Ben was particularly disturbed about the amount spent on corrugated boxes purchased from Southeastern Corrugated. Ben said, I dont like the salesman from that company. He comes around here acting like he owns the place. He loves to tell us about his fancy car, house, and vacations. It seems to me he must be making too much money off of us! Jeff responded that he heard Southeastern Corrugated was going to ask for a price increase to cover the rising costs of raw material paper stock. Jeff further stated that Southeastern would probably ask for more than what was justified simply from rising paper stock costs. After the meeting, Ben decided he had heard enough. After all, he prided himself on being a results-oriented manager. There was no way he was going to allow that salesman to keep taking advantage of Coastal Products. Ben called Jeff and told him it was time to rebid the corrugated contract before Southeastern came in with a price increase request. Who did Jeff know that might be interested in the business? Jeff replied he had several companies in mind to include in the bidding process. These companies would surely come in at a lower price, partly because they used lower-grade boxes that would probably work well enough in Coastal Products process. Jeff also explained that these suppliers were not serious contenders for the business. Their purpose was to create competition with the bids. Ben told Jeff to make sure that Southeastern was well aware that these new suppliers were bidding on the contract. He also said to make sure the suppliers knew that price was going to be the determining factor in this quote, because he considered corrugated boxes to be a standard industry item. Is Ben Gibson acting legally? Is he acting ethically? Why or why not?
Scenario 3 Ben Gibson, the purchasing manager at Coastal Products, was reviewing purchasing expenditures for packaging materials with Jeff Joyner. Ben was particularly disturbed about the amount spent on corrugated boxes purchased from Southeastern Corrugated. Ben said, I dont like the salesman from that company. He comes around here acting like he owns the place. He loves to tell us about his fancy car, house, and vacations. It seems to me he must be making too much money off of us! Jeff responded that he heard Southeastern Corrugated was going to ask for a price increase to cover the rising costs of raw material paper stock. Jeff further stated that Southeastern would probably ask for more than what was justified simply from rising paper stock costs. After the meeting, Ben decided he had heard enough. After all, he prided himself on being a results-oriented manager. There was no way he was going to allow that salesman to keep taking advantage of Coastal Products. Ben called Jeff and told him it was time to rebid the corrugated contract before Southeastern came in with a price increase request. Who did Jeff know that might be interested in the business? Jeff replied he had several companies in mind to include in the bidding process. These companies would surely come in at a lower price, partly because they used lower-grade boxes that would probably work well enough in Coastal Products process. Jeff also explained that these suppliers were not serious contenders for the business. Their purpose was to create competition with the bids. Ben told Jeff to make sure that Southeastern was well aware that these new suppliers were bidding on the contract. He also said to make sure the suppliers knew that price was going to be the determining factor in this quote, because he considered corrugated boxes to be a standard industry item. As the Marketing Manager for Southeastern Corrugated, what would you do upon receiving the request for quotation from Coastal Products?