Mr. M has been working for a trading company for more than a year. When he first joined the company, the company did not ask him to sign a contract, and he did not sign any “Employment At Will” paper either. This morning when he walked in the office, he was called to the manager’s office and was told that he has been laid off and he needed to pack his own personal belongings and leave within an hour. About this lay-off, which of the followings is considered correct? Please tell which one is true a. The company did not sign a"Employment At Will" with him whenhe was hired. Hence, the company hasno right to terminate him like that. Mr.M can sue the company for this.b. When there was no employmentcontract signed, the "Employment AtWill" doctrine is assumed the default.The company has the right toterminate Mr. M and ask him to leaveimmediately.c. The company cannot terminate himlike that. But I think it's better for Mr. Mto leave the company right away.d. When there was no “Employment AtWill" paper signed, the company hasno right to ask him to leaveimmediately. The company needs togive Mr. M at least two weeksnotification.

Employment at will is described as a condition in which either the employee or employer can end…

Answered: a. The company did not sign a…

Understanding Business

12th Edition

ISBN:9781259929434

Author:William Nickels

Publisher:William Nickels

Chapter1: Taking Risks And Making Profits Within The Dynamic Business Environment

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1CE

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

Mr. M has been working for a trading company for more than a year. When he first joined the company, the company did not ask him to sign a contract, and he did not sign any “Employment At Will” paper either. This morning when he walked in the office, he was called to the manager’s office and was told that he has been laid off and he needed to pack his own personal belongings and leave within an hour. About this lay-off, which of the followings is considered correct? Please tell which one is true

a. The company did not sign a
"Employment At Will" with him when
he was hired. Hence, the company has
no right to terminate him like that. Mr.
M can sue the company for this.
b. When there was no employment
contract signed, the "Employment At
Will" doctrine is assumed the default.
The company has the right to
terminate Mr. M and ask him to leave
immediately.
c. The company cannot terminate him
like that. But I think it's better for Mr. M
to leave the company right away.
d. When there was no “Employment At
Will" paper signed, the company has
no right to ask him to leave
immediately. The company needs to
give Mr. M at least two weeks
notification.

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions