(a) While the claim was incorrect, the purported proof seemingly does have some legitimate mathematical ideas. Can you revise the claim, and adapt the purported proof to obtain a correct proof of your updated claim? (b) Given your claim and proof in (a), can you come up with another result of the form "For every n N where [some condition], [some expression involving n] is not a prime and prove it? (This is obviously an open-ended, explorative question that has no set correct answer.)
(a) While the claim was incorrect, the purported proof seemingly does have some legitimate mathematical ideas. Can you revise the claim, and adapt the purported proof to obtain a correct proof of your updated claim? (b) Given your claim and proof in (a), can you come up with another result of the form "For every n N where [some condition], [some expression involving n] is not a prime and prove it? (This is obviously an open-ended, explorative question that has no set correct answer.)
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
Related questions
Question

Transcribed Image Text:Claim: For every n € N, n² – 1 is not a prime number.
Purported Proof: Notice that n² – 1 can be factored as
(n + 1)(n − 1). Thus, n² – 1 is a product and has divisors
n+ 1 and n − 1, and therefore it is not prime.
![(a) While the claim was incorrect, the purported proof seemingly does have some legitimate
mathematical ideas. Can you revise the claim, and adapt the purported proof to obtain
a correct proof of your updated claim?
(b) Given your claim and proof in (a), can you come up with another result of the form
"For every n N where [some condition], [some expression involving n] is not a prime
and prove it? (This is obviously an open-ended, explorative question that has no set
correct answer.)](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Faf4d5614-e5fa-4399-aabc-c345eeef0588%2Ffef1fec4-3b9f-4174-9f3e-23032289eba5%2F6faru9q_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:(a) While the claim was incorrect, the purported proof seemingly does have some legitimate
mathematical ideas. Can you revise the claim, and adapt the purported proof to obtain
a correct proof of your updated claim?
(b) Given your claim and proof in (a), can you come up with another result of the form
"For every n N where [some condition], [some expression involving n] is not a prime
and prove it? (This is obviously an open-ended, explorative question that has no set
correct answer.)
Expert Solution

Step 1: Define Prime Number
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 3 images

Recommended textbooks for you

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated

Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education

Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated

Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education

Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY

Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,

