A transportation strategist wanted to compare the traffic congestion levels across four regions. The accompanying data table contains congestion level, defined as the percent increase in overall travel time when compared to a fre situation (an uncongested situation) for 10 cities in each region. Complete (a) through (d) below. Click here to view the traffic congestion data. Click here to view a partial table of critical values of the Studentized Range, Q. Traffic congestion (%) a. At the 0.05 level of significance, is there evidence of a difference in the mean congestion level across regions? Determine the hypotheses. Choose the correct answer below. 1 3 O A. Hoi H1 = H2 =... 410 H,: Not all H are equal (where j= 1,2,.,10) O B. H: H1 = H2 "P3 =H4 62 51 44 42 62 H;: Not all u are equal (where j= 1,2,3,4) O D. Ho: H1 "H2 = H3 =H4 59 44 54 38 OC. Họ: H1 = P2=.. H10 50 46 40 39 37 36 47 38 36 45 41 31 44 39 31 Perform a one-way ANOVA. Find the test statistic. 43 44 38 37 31 30 FSTAT =O (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Determine the p-value. p-value = (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Print Done Reach a decision.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
**Traffic Congestion Analysis Across Four Regions**

A transportation strategist conducted a study to compare the traffic congestion levels across four different regions. The congestion level is defined as the percent increase in overall travel time compared to free flow conditions for a set of 10 cities in each region.

**Hypothesis Testing:**
The strategist aimed to determine if there is any evidence of a difference in the mean congestion level across these regions at a 0.05 level of significance.

- **Hypotheses to Consider:**
  - **Option B:**
    - Null Hypothesis (H₀): μ₁ = μ₂ = μ₃ = μ₄
    - Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): Not all μⱼ are equal (where j = 1, 2, 3, 4)

- **Statistical Test Conducted:**
  - A one-way ANOVA was performed to test the hypothesis.

- **Decision Criteria:**
  - The ANOVA test outputs an F-statistic and a p-value, which need to be compared to a critical value and the significance level, respectively, to reach a decision. 
  - The p-value is compared to a threshold to decide whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis. 
  - If p-value < threshold, it indicates sufficient evidence to conclude a significant difference between regions.

**Post-hoc Analysis:**
If the ANOVA results suggest significant differences, a Tukey-Kramer procedure may be applied to determine specific regions where mean congestion levels differ.

**Regions for Further Analysis:**
At a 0.05 significance level, determine which regions show significant differences. Check the applicable pairs:
- A. Region 1 and Region 2
- B. Region 1 and Region 4
- C. Region 2 and Region 3
- D. Region 2 and Region 4

**Traffic Congestion Data Table:**
The data table provides the congestion percentages for each of the four regions, showing individual congestion levels for 10 different cities.

**Considerations for Analysis:**
- If ANOVA results are significant, further investigate using post-hoc tests to identify specific differences between regions.
- Interpret findings to inform transportation strategies effectively.

This information helps in understanding regional differences in congestion, enabling targeted improvements to traffic management policies.
Transcribed Image Text:**Traffic Congestion Analysis Across Four Regions** A transportation strategist conducted a study to compare the traffic congestion levels across four different regions. The congestion level is defined as the percent increase in overall travel time compared to free flow conditions for a set of 10 cities in each region. **Hypothesis Testing:** The strategist aimed to determine if there is any evidence of a difference in the mean congestion level across these regions at a 0.05 level of significance. - **Hypotheses to Consider:** - **Option B:** - Null Hypothesis (H₀): μ₁ = μ₂ = μ₃ = μ₄ - Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): Not all μⱼ are equal (where j = 1, 2, 3, 4) - **Statistical Test Conducted:** - A one-way ANOVA was performed to test the hypothesis. - **Decision Criteria:** - The ANOVA test outputs an F-statistic and a p-value, which need to be compared to a critical value and the significance level, respectively, to reach a decision. - The p-value is compared to a threshold to decide whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis. - If p-value < threshold, it indicates sufficient evidence to conclude a significant difference between regions. **Post-hoc Analysis:** If the ANOVA results suggest significant differences, a Tukey-Kramer procedure may be applied to determine specific regions where mean congestion levels differ. **Regions for Further Analysis:** At a 0.05 significance level, determine which regions show significant differences. Check the applicable pairs: - A. Region 1 and Region 2 - B. Region 1 and Region 4 - C. Region 2 and Region 3 - D. Region 2 and Region 4 **Traffic Congestion Data Table:** The data table provides the congestion percentages for each of the four regions, showing individual congestion levels for 10 different cities. **Considerations for Analysis:** - If ANOVA results are significant, further investigate using post-hoc tests to identify specific differences between regions. - Interpret findings to inform transportation strategies effectively. This information helps in understanding regional differences in congestion, enabling targeted improvements to traffic management policies.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman