A study was conducted to determine the growth performance of swine among varying levels of protein supplements (20% and 40%) and percent of cassava root (20%, 30%, 40%) as additive in rice bran. All the levels of factors were purposively selected. The treatment combinations were randomly assigned to swine of the same initial weight. Percent gain in weight were obtained after 2 months. Suppose all the assumptions for the parametric test were satisfied. The following results were obtained using R commander: Anova Table (Type II tests) Response: weight_gain Pr (>F) 2 14.9692 0.0005488 Sum Sq Df F value cassava_root protein cassava_root:protein Residuals 14.0211 0.0556 0.1186 0.7364924 0.2411 2096ררר.0.25740 5.6200 12 1. Which of the following is(are) TRUE regarding the test for the main effect of the percent of protein supplements at a = 5%? We reject the null hypothesis. We have insufficient evidence to say that the average growth rate of swine differs for at least one level of percent protein supplements. I. II. A. I only C. Both I and |I B. II only D. Neither I nor II 2. Which of the following is(are) TRUE regarding the test for the main effect of percent of cassava roots at a = 5%? We reject the null hypothesis II. There is no difference in the effect of different levels of percent of cassava roots on the growth rate of swine. I. A. I only C. Both I and II B. Il only D. Neither I nor II 3. Suppose that there is no interaction between the factor levels and one of the main effects have at least one level that has a different effect on the growth rate of swine. Which of the following is(are) the appropriate post-hoc analysis to be performed in the analysis? * Perform pairwise mean comparison among the levels of the main factor with significant result to determine which pair of treatment levels have a different effect. II. Perform pairwise mean comparison among the different levels of the treatment combination to determine which pair of treatment combination have a different effect. I. A. I only C. Both I and II B. Il only D. Neither I nor|l
A study was conducted to determine the growth performance of swine among varying levels of protein supplements (20% and 40%) and percent of cassava root (20%, 30%, 40%) as additive in rice bran. All the levels of factors were purposively selected. The treatment combinations were randomly assigned to swine of the same initial weight. Percent gain in weight were obtained after 2 months. Suppose all the assumptions for the parametric test were satisfied. The following results were obtained using R commander: Anova Table (Type II tests) Response: weight_gain Pr (>F) 2 14.9692 0.0005488 Sum Sq Df F value cassava_root protein cassava_root:protein Residuals 14.0211 0.0556 0.1186 0.7364924 0.2411 2096ררר.0.25740 5.6200 12 1. Which of the following is(are) TRUE regarding the test for the main effect of the percent of protein supplements at a = 5%? We reject the null hypothesis. We have insufficient evidence to say that the average growth rate of swine differs for at least one level of percent protein supplements. I. II. A. I only C. Both I and |I B. II only D. Neither I nor II 2. Which of the following is(are) TRUE regarding the test for the main effect of percent of cassava roots at a = 5%? We reject the null hypothesis II. There is no difference in the effect of different levels of percent of cassava roots on the growth rate of swine. I. A. I only C. Both I and II B. Il only D. Neither I nor II 3. Suppose that there is no interaction between the factor levels and one of the main effects have at least one level that has a different effect on the growth rate of swine. Which of the following is(are) the appropriate post-hoc analysis to be performed in the analysis? * Perform pairwise mean comparison among the levels of the main factor with significant result to determine which pair of treatment levels have a different effect. II. Perform pairwise mean comparison among the different levels of the treatment combination to determine which pair of treatment combination have a different effect. I. A. I only C. Both I and II B. Il only D. Neither I nor|l
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
Provide brief explanation for choice of answer
Transcribed Image Text:A study was conducted to determine the growth performance
of swine among varying levels of protein supplements (20% and 40%) and
percent of cassava root (20%, 30%, 40%) as additive in rice bran. All the levels of
factors were purposively selected. The treatment combinations were randomly
assigned to swine of the same initial weight. Percent gain in weight were
obtained after 2 months. Suppose all the assumptions for the parametric test
were satisfied. The following results were obtained using R commander:
Anova Table (Type II tests)
Response: weight_gain
Sum Sq Df F value
Pr (>F)
cassava_root
protein
14.0211
2 14.9692 0.0005488
0.0556
1
0.1186 0.7364924
cassava_root:protein
Residuals
0.2411
0.2574 0.7772096
5.6200 12
1. Which of the following is(are) TRUE regarding the test for the main
effect of the percent of protein supplements at a = 5%?
I.
We reject the null hypothesis.
II.
We have insufficient evidence to say that the average growth rate of swine differs for at
least one level of percent protein supplements.
A. I only
C. Both I and |I
B. Il only
D. Neither I nor II
2. Which of the following is(are) TRUE regarding the test for the main
effect of percent of cassava roots at a = 5%?
I.
We reject the null hypothesis
II. There is no difference in the effect of different levels of percent of cassava roots on the
growth rate of swine.
A. I only
C. Both I and ||
B. Il only
D. Neither I nor II
3. Suppose that there is no interaction between the factor levels and one
of the main effects have at least one level that has a different effect on
the growth rate of swine. Which of the following is(are) the appropriate
post-hoc analysis to be performed in the analysis? *
factor with significant
Perform pairwise mean comparison among the levels
result to determine which pair of treatment levels have a different effect.
II. Perform pairwise mean comparison among the different levels of the treatment
combination to determine which pair of treatment combination have a different effect.
the
A. I only
C. Both I and II
B. Il only
D. Neither I nor II
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps with 1 images
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman