A researcher was interested in studying the effects of job insecurity on employee job attitudes. Half of the research participants were randomly assigned to experience high insecurity (manipulated by announcing 50% layoffs) and half were assigned to experience low insecurity (announcement of 5% layoffs). In addition, the researcher was also interested in whether or not the method by which the layoffs were to occur would influence job attitudes and perceived fairness. Therefore, half of the research participants were assigned to a fair layoff condition (i.e., layoffs determined by job performance) and half were assigned to an unfair condition (i.e., layoffs determined by favoritism). Employees were asked to make ratings on several issues: how important their jobs were ("job importance"), the extent to which they intended to quit working for the organization ("turnover intentions"), their perceived chances of being laid off ("chances of being laid off"), and perceptions of fairness ("perceived fairness"). Finally, they were asked to decide whether they wanted to quit working for the organization or remain employed with the organization ("decision to quit").' 5 or 50% Layoff Fair/Unfair Job Turnover Chances of Perceived Decision

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Topic Video

Question

14ab-

tcrit:___

tobs:___

The researcher wanted to be sure that her manipulation for job insecurity actually influenced her participants’ perceptions of being laid off. Using an independent samples t-test, assess whether employees in the 50% layoff condition perceived their chances of being laid off to be higher than employees in the 5% layoff condition. Use an α = .05

A researcher was interested in studying the effects of job insecurity on employee job attitudes. Half of the research participants were randomly
assigned to experience high insecurity (manipulated by announcing 50% layoffs) and half were assigned to experience low insecurity (announcement
of 5% layoffs). In addition, the researcher was also interested in whether or not the method by which the layoffs were to occur would influence job
attitudes and perceived fairness. Therefore, half of the research participants were assigned to a fair layoff condition (i.e., layoffs determined by job
performance) and half were assigned to an unfair condition (i.e., layoffs determined by favoritism). Employees were asked to make ratings on several
issues: how important their jobs were ("job importance"), the extent to which they intended to quit working for the organization ("turnover
intentions"), their perceived chances of being laid off ("chances of being laid off"), and perceptions of fairness ("perceived fairness"). Finally, they were
asked to decide whether they wanted to quit working for the organization or remain employed with the organization ("decision to quit").'
5 or 50% Layoff Fair/Unfair
Job
Turnover
Chances of Perceived Decision
Condition
Method Importance Intentions Being Laid Off Fairness
to Quit
4
3
7
1
2
3
75
2
1
1
2
10
1
2
4
5
1
1
3
5
2
1
1
4
3
5
7
1
2
3
4
75
2
2
1
2
1
10
2
1
3
4
75
2
1
1
2
10
3
2
75
7
1
1
6.
2
4
50
2
2
2
2
50
1
2
1
6
3
25
3
2
2
2
2
50
1
2
1
2
2
50
2
2
2
4
3
50
2
1
2
2
3
50
1
2
2
25
5
2
2
4
3
50
2
1
Coding Manual: Layoff Condition: 1= 5% 2 = 50%
Fairness Condition: 1 = Fair 2 = Unfair
Decision to Quit: 1= Quit 2= Remain

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 8 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

$Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Means$

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions