A recent report claimed that 13% of students typically walk to school. DeAnna thinks that the proportion is higher than 0.13 at her large elementary school. She surveys a random sample of 100 students and finds that 17 typically walk to school. DeAnna would like to carry out a test at the a = 0.05 significance level of Но : р —D 0.13 На : р> 0.13 where p = the true proportion of all students at her elementary school who typically walk to school. What conclusion would you make? Because the P-value of 0.1170 > a = 0.05, we fail to reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that the true proportion of all students at this elementary school who typically walk to school is greater than 0.13. Because the P-value of 0.1170 > a = 0.05, we fail to reject Ho. We do not have convincing evidence that the true proportion of all students at this elementary school who typically walk to school is greater than 0.13. Because the P-value of 0.1170 > a = 0.05, we reject Ho. We do not have convincing evidence that the true proportion of all students at this elementary school who typically walk to school is greater than 0.13. Because the P-value of 0.1170 > a = 0.05, we reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that the true proportion of all students at this elementary school who typically walk to school is greater than 0.13.
A recent report claimed that 13% of students typically walk to school. DeAnna thinks that the proportion is higher than 0.13 at her large elementary school. She surveys a random sample of 100 students and finds that 17 typically walk to school. DeAnna would like to carry out a test at the a = 0.05 significance level of Но : р —D 0.13 На : р> 0.13 where p = the true proportion of all students at her elementary school who typically walk to school. What conclusion would you make? Because the P-value of 0.1170 > a = 0.05, we fail to reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that the true proportion of all students at this elementary school who typically walk to school is greater than 0.13. Because the P-value of 0.1170 > a = 0.05, we fail to reject Ho. We do not have convincing evidence that the true proportion of all students at this elementary school who typically walk to school is greater than 0.13. Because the P-value of 0.1170 > a = 0.05, we reject Ho. We do not have convincing evidence that the true proportion of all students at this elementary school who typically walk to school is greater than 0.13. Because the P-value of 0.1170 > a = 0.05, we reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that the true proportion of all students at this elementary school who typically walk to school is greater than 0.13.
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.6: Summarizing Categorical Data
Problem 42PFA
Related questions
Question
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305115545
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305115545
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning