Solution A proposed project has estimated sale units of 2,500, give or take 2percent. The expected variable cost per unit is $12.79 and the expectedfixed costs are $17,500. Cost estimates are considered accurate withina plus or minus 3 percent range. The depreciation expense is $2,850.The sale price is estimated at $15.40 a unit, give or take 3 percent. Thecompany bases its sensitivity analysis on the expected case scenario.If a sensitivity analysis is conducted using a variable cost estimate of$13, what will be the total annual variable costs?

Steps and explanations are as follows:In case of any doubt, please let me know. Thank you.

Answered: A proposed project has estimated sale…

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter11: Capital Budgeting And Risk

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 21P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Appalachian Crafts is analyzing a project with expected sales of 18,900 units, ±2 percent. The expected variable cost per unit is $23 and the expected fixed costs are $52,000. Cost estimates are considered accurate within a range of ±1 percent. The depreciation expense is $18,400. The sale price is estimated at $54 a unit, ±2 percent. What is the total dollar difference between the revenue using the optimistic sale price versus the expected sale price?
Southern Goods is analyzing a proposed project using standard sensitivity analysis. The company expects to sell 4,500 units, ±11 percent. The expected variable cost per unit is $13 and the expected fixed costs are $12,000. Cost estimates are considered accurate within a ± 5 percent range. The depreciation expense is $5,000. The sale price is estimated at $22 a unit, ±2 percent. If the company conducts a sensitivity analysis using a variable cost of $12, what will the total variable cost estimate be? $53,625 $53,500 $54,000 $48,060 $59,940
Suppose the MARR is 10% with probability 0.25, 12% with probability 0.50, and 15% with probability 0.25; what is the probability that Alternative A is the most economic alternative? Two investment alternatives are being considered. Alternative A requires an initial investment of $15,000 in equipment; annual operating and maintenance costs are anticipated to be normally distributed, with a mean of $5,000 and a standard deviation of $500; the terminal salvage value at the end of the 8-year planning horizon is anticipated to be normally distributed, with a mean of $2,000 and a standard deviation of $800. Alternative B requires endof-year annual expenditures over the planning horizon. The annual expenditure will be normally distributed, with a mean of $8,000 and a standard deviation of $750. Using a MARR of 15%, what is the probability that Alternative A is the most economic alternative?
A company estimates that an average-risk project has a WACC of 10 percent, a below-average risk project has a WACC of 8 percent, and an above-average risk project has a WACC of 12 percent. Which of the following independent projects should the company accept? Project A has average risk and an IRR = 9 percent. Project B has below-average risk and an IRR = 8.5 percent. Project C has above-average risk and an IRR = 11 percent. None of the above
Plot a sensitivity graph for annual worth versus initial cost, annual revenue, and salvage value for the data below. Vary only one parameter at a time, each within the range of -20% to +20%. MARR is 3%/year. Project life is 4 years. Based on your graph, which parameter shows the MOST sensitivity? Initial Cost: $120,000- Annual Revenue: $25,000 - Salvage Value: $35,000 O Cannot be determined O Annual Revenue O Initial Cost O Salvage Value
How do I determine which is the correct answer for this problem? A company estimates that an average-risk project has a WACC of 10 percent, a below-average-risk project has a WACC of 8 percent, and an above-average-risk project has a WACC of 12 percent. Which of the following independent projects should the company accept? a. Project A has average risk and an IRR = 9 percent. b. Project B has below-average risk and an IRR = 8.5 percent. c. Project C has above-average risk and an IRR = 11 percent. d. All of the projects above should be accepted. e. None of the projects above should be accepted. Please answer fast I give you upvote.
8. Modified Internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project's IRR. Consider the following situation: Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $400,000. The project's expected cash flows are: Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Cash Flow $325,000 -200,000 425,000 475,000
Suppose Tapley Inc. uses a WACC of 8% for below-average risk projects, 10% for average-risk projects, and 12% for above-average risk projects. Which of the following independent projects should Tapley accept, assuming that the company uses the NPV method when choosing projects? Group of answer choices Project A, which has average risk and an IRR = 9%. Project C, which has above-average risk and an IRR = 11%. Project B, which has below-average risk and an IRR = 8.5%. All of these projects should be accepted. Without information about the projects' NPVs we cannot determine which project(s) should be accepted.
Suppose Tapley Inc. uses a WACC of 8% for below-average risk projects, 10% for average-risk projects, and 12% for above-average risk projects. Which of the following independent projects should Tapley accept, assuming that the company uses the NPV method when choosing projects? Project B, which has below-average risk and an IRR = 8.5%. All of these projects should be accepted as they will produce a positive NPV. Without information about the projects’ NPVs we cannot determine which one or ones should be accepted. Project C, which has above-average risk and an IRR = 11%. Project A, which has average risk and an IRR = 9%. (I want see step to step to get the answer Project B, which has below-average risk and an IRR = 8.5%.
Determine the associated risk measure in this equipment investment in terms of standard deviation. Because of the uncertainty of technology being used in this equipment, it has not been possible to get the initial cost accurately. The annual benefit, however, is estimated to be $20,000 with a possible equipment life of 5 years. The salvage value is expected to be 10% of the initial cost. MARR =8% First Cost, $ $50,000 $80,000 $100,000 $125,000 Probability 0.25 0.35 0.30 0.10
Waste Management Inc. is analyzing an average-risk project, and the following data have been developed. Unit sales will be constant, but the sales price will increase with inflation. Fixed costs will also be constant, but variable costs will rise with inflation. The project should last for 3 years, and there will be no salvage value. This is just one project for the firm, so any losses can be used to offset gains on other firm projects. What is the project's expected NPV? IRR? Would you accept this project? WACC 9.50% Net investment cost (depreciable basis) $100,000 Units sold 40,000 Average price per unit, Year 1 $25.00 Fixed op. cost excl. depr'n (constant) $150,000 Variable op. cost/unit, Year 1 $20.20 Annual depreciation rate 33.33% Expected inflation 5.00% Tax rate 40.0% Please show work.
The investor-developer would not be comfortable with a 7.8 percent return on cost because the margin for error is too risky. If construction costs are higher or rents are lower than anticipated, the project may not be feasible. The asking price of the project is $4,600,000 and the construction cost per unit is $80,400. The current rent to justify the land acqusition is $1.3 per square foot. The weighted average is 900 square feet per unit. Average vacancy and Operating expenses are 5% and 35% of Gross Revenue respectively. Use the following data to rework the calculations in Concept Box 16.2 9(please see screen shots attached to question) in order to assess the feasibility of the project: Required: a. Based on the fact that the project appears to have 9,360 square feet of surface area in excess of zoning requirements, the developer could make an argument to the planning department for an additional 10 units, 250 units in total, or 25 units per acre. What is the percentage return on…

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Finance

ISBN:

9781337514835

Author:

MOYER

Publisher:

CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT

Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course …

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305627734

Author:

Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Finance

ISBN:

9781337514835

Author:

MOYER

Publisher:

CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT

Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course …

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305627734

Author:

Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS