A proposed embankment fill requires 7500 m³ of compacted soil. The voidratio of the compacted fill is specified as 0.7. Soil can be transported from oneof the four borrow pits, as described in the following table. The void ratio,specific gravity of soil solids, and the cost per cubic meter for moving the soilto the proposed construction site are provided in the table.a. Determine the volume of each borrow pit soil required to meet the spec-ification of the embankment site.b. Make the necessary calculations to select the borrow pit which would bemost cost-effective.Borrow pitVoid ratioGSCost ($/m³)I0.852.6611II0.922.69III1.212.719IV0.892.7310Q

Step 1: Given as:Volume of solids Vs = V/(1+e)HenceVolume of solids required = 7500/ (1+0.7)…

Answered: A proposed embankment fill requires…

Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Course List)

9th Edition

ISBN:9781337705028

Author:Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan

Publisher:Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan

Chapter2: Geotechnical Properties Of Soil

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2.7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

How is the plasticity index of a soil determined?
Repeat Problem 2.11 with the following data. 2.11 The grain-size characteristics of a soil are given in the following table. a. Draw the grain-size distribution curve. b. Determine the percentages of gravel, sand, silt, and clay according to the MIT system. c. Repeat Part b using the USDA system. d. Repeat Part b using the AASHTO system.
Repeat Problem 2.8 using the following data. 2.8 The following are the results of a sieve and hydrometer analysis. a. Draw the grain-size distribution curve. b. Determine the percentages of gravel, sand, silt and clay according to the MIT system. c. Repeat Part b according to the USDA system. d. Repeat Part b according to the AASHTO system.
Redo Problem 2.7 according to the AASHTO system (Table 2.3). 2.7 The particle characteristics of a soil are given below. Draw the particle-size distribution curve and find the percentages of gravel, sand, silt, and clay according to the MIT system (Table 2.3).
Refer to Problem 2.C.1. Results of the sieve analysis for Soils A, B, and C are given below. To obtain a more representative sample for further geotechnical testing, a ternary blend is created by uniformly mixing 8000 kg of each soil. Answer the following questions. a. If a sieve analysis is conducted on the mixture using the same set of sieves as shown above, compute the mass retained (as a percentage) and cumulative percent passing in each sieve. b. What would be the uniformity coefficient (Cu) and the coefficient of gradation (Cc) of the mixture?
The following data were obtained by conducting liquid limit and plastic limit tests on a soil collected from the site. Liquid limit tests: Plastic limit test: PL = 19.3% a. Draw the flow curve and determine the liquid limit. b. Using the Casagrande plasticity chart (Figure 4.21), determine the soil type.
Redo Problem 2.7 according to the USDA system (Table 2.3). 2.7 The particle characteristics of a soil are given below. Draw the particle-size distribution curve and find the percentages of gravel, sand, silt, and clay according to the MIT system (Table 2.3).
Repeat Problem 2.4 with the following data. 2.4 The following are the results of a sieve analysis. a. Determine the percent finer than each sieve and plot a grain-size distribution curve. b. Determine D10, D30, and D60 for each soil. c. Calculate the uniformity coefficient Cu. d. Calculate the coefficient of gradation Cc.
Since laboratory or field experiments are generally expensive and time consuming, geotechnical engineers often have to rely on empirical relationships to predict design parameters. Section 6.6 presents such relationships for predicting optimum moisture content and maximum dry unit weight. Let us use some of these equations and compare our results with known experimental data. The following table presents the results from laboratory compaction tests conducted on a wide range of fine-grained soils using various compactive efforts (E). Based on the soil data given in the table, determine the optimum moisture content and maximum dry unit weight using the empirical relationships presented in Section 6.6. a. Use the Osman et al. (2008) method [Eqs. (6.15) through (6.18)]. b. Use the Gurtug and Sridharan (2004) method [Eqs. (6.13) and (6.14)]. c. Use the Matteo et al. (2009) method [Eqs. (6.19) and (6.20)]. d. Plot the calculated wopt against the experimental wopt, and the calculated d(max) with the experimental d(max). Draw a 45 line of equality on each plot. e. Comment on the predictive capabilities of various methods. What can you say about the inherent nature of empirical models?
For soils that are classified by the following USCS symbols, what would be the most likely AASHTO symbols? (Reference: Liu, 1970) Gravels: GW, GP, GM, GC Sands: SW, SP, SM, SC Fines: ML, CL, MH, CH
The properties of seven different clayey soils are shown below (Skempton and Northey, 1952). Investigate the relationship between the strength and plasticity characteristics by performing the following tasks: a. Estimate the plasticity index for each soil using Skemptons definition of activity [Eq. (4.28)]. b. Estimate the probable mineral composition of the clay soils based on PI and A (use Table 4.3) c. Sensitivity (St) refers to the loss of strength when the soil is remolded or disturbed. It is defined as the ratio of the undisturbed strength (f-undisturbed) to the remolded strength (f-remolded)) at the same moisture content [Eq. (12.49)]. From the given data, estimate f-remolded for the clay soils. d. Plot the variations of undisturbed and remolded shear strengths with the activity, A, and explain the observed behavior.
In AASHTO, which group are the following soils likely to fall into? a. A well graded gravel with approximately 10% fines. b. A well graded sand with approximately 10% fines. c. A uniform fine sand. d. A high plastic clay.

Recommended textbooks for you

Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…

Civil Engineering

ISBN:

9781337705028

Author:

Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Construction Materials, Methods and Techniques (M…

Civil Engineering

ISBN:

9781305086272

Author:

William P. Spence, Eva Kultermann

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (MindTap C…

Civil Engineering

ISBN:

9781305970939

Author:

Braja M. Das, Khaled Sobhan

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…

Civil Engineering

ISBN:

9781337705028

Author:

Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Construction Materials, Methods and Techniques (M…

Civil Engineering

ISBN:

9781305086272

Author:

William P. Spence, Eva Kultermann

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (MindTap C…

Civil Engineering

ISBN:

9781305970939

Author:

Braja M. Das, Khaled Sobhan

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…

Civil Engineering

ISBN:

9781305081550

Author:

Braja M. Das

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering (MindTap…

Civil Engineering

ISBN:

9781305635180

Author:

Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS