A Polish company(A), which had its place of business in Krakow Poland sold a set of 80 steel girders to a Finnish construction company (B) with its place of business in Turku, Finland. According to the contract between the parties, all the steel girders were to be delivered painted. The seller however delivered a considerable part of the girders (25 pcs.) unpainted, which left the buyer, company B highly unsatisfied. Company B sought to enforce the contract at a Finnish court of law. Discuss the following questions that arose before the court: 1.Could the CISG regulate the contract between the parties? And if so, based upon what? (Which article)? 2.Were the delivered goods in conformity with the contract? The seller claims that the buyer had a duty to give notice in connection with a possible lack of conformity of the goods, but had not done so. 3. Would the buyer still have the right to a remedy? Even if it had not given notice of the lack of conformity? If, so based upon which article(s)? 4. What could the remedy be in this case? 5. Could the buyer even have a right to compensation, even if the buyer in the case had not submitted any evidence of the actual loss?
A Polish company(A), which had its place of business in Krakow Poland sold a set of 80 steel girders to a Finnish construction company (B) with its place of business in Turku, Finland. According to the contract between the parties, all the steel girders were to be delivered painted. The seller however delivered a considerable part of the girders (25 pcs.) unpainted, which left the buyer, company B highly unsatisfied. Company B sought to enforce the contract at a Finnish court of law. Discuss the following questions that arose before the court: 1.Could the CISG regulate the contract between the parties? And if so, based upon what? (Which article)? 2.Were the delivered goods in conformity with the contract? The seller claims that the buyer had a duty to give notice in connection with a possible lack of conformity of the goods, but had not done so. 3. Would the buyer still have the right to a remedy? Even if it had not given notice of the lack of conformity? If, so based upon which article(s)? 4. What could the remedy be in this case? 5. Could the buyer even have a right to compensation, even if the buyer in the case had not submitted any evidence of the actual loss?
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
100%
A Polish company(A), which had its place of business in Krakow Poland sold a set of 80 steel girders to a Finnish construction company (B) with its place of business in Turku, Finland.
According to the contract between the parties, all the steel girders were to be delivered painted. The seller however delivered a considerable part of the girders (25 pcs.) unpainted, which left the buyer, company B highly unsatisfied. Company B sought to enforce the contract at a Finnish court of law.
Discuss the following questions that arose before the court:
1.Could the CISG regulate the contract between the parties? And if so, based upon what? (Which article)?
2.Were the delivered goods in conformity with the contract?
The seller claims that the buyer had a duty to give notice in connection with a possible lack of conformity of the goods, but had not done so.
3. Would the buyer still have the right to a remedy? Even if it had not given notice of the lack of conformity? If, so based upon which article(s)?
4. What could the remedy be in this case?
5. Could the buyer even have a right to compensation, even if the buyer in the case had not submitted any evidence of the actual loss?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Follow-up Questions
Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.
Follow-up Question
Could the buyer even have a right to compensation, even if the buyer in the case had not submitted any evidence of the actual loss?
Solution
by Bartleby ExpertFollow-up Question
What could the remedy be in this case?
Could the buyer even have a right to compensation, even if the buyer in the case had not submitted any evidence of the actual loss?
Solution
by Bartleby ExpertKnowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education