A patient who experiences low self-esteem seeks the help of a therapist. The therapist finds that the patient's self-esteem problems started after his current relationship began. The patient describes his current partner as being highly successful and competent and reports feeling inferior to his partner. He reports that he "hates feeling that way." He has stopped attending social events with his partner because such events elevate his feelings of inferiority. However, despite his feelings of inferiority and envy, the patient also reports having extreme admiration and love for his partner. When researching for the case, the therapist reads a study on interpersonal attraction. The researchers asked participants to rate their actual self and their ideal self on 50 personality dimensions. These ratings were then used to develop two scores as proxy measures of actual and ideal self. Then, the participants were told that they were going to be paired with potential dates and were given information on their potential dates' scores on the same personality dimensions. The dates' scores were made up by the researchers to be either similar to or different from each participant's actual self or ideal scores. The study showed that participants reported greater interest in dates who were similar to their ideal selves than in dates who were similar to their actual selves. The therapist finds the study relevant to the patient's case but is reluctant to make direct inferences because she suspects that the participants' ratings of actual self may have been influenced by social desirability. The therapist decides that the self-evaluation maintenance model (SEM) may help explain the patient's case. The model posits that upward comparison (comparing oneself with a more successful other) can lead to negative self-evaluation, which causes psychological distress. The individual is motivated to eliminate this distress, either by downplaying the relevance of the dimension of comparison (for example, if the patient's partner is a successful mathematician, the patient can state that mathematical skills are not that important) or by weakening the social bonds with the successful other. The patient described in the passage is most likely using which defense mechanism? O A. Projection O B. Rationalization O C. Reaction formation O D. Emotional displacement Was the independent variable in the study manipulated by the researchers? O A. Yes; the researchers obtained specific measures of the actual self and the ideal self from the participants. OB. Yes, the researchers controlled the similarity of the potential date to the participant's ratings of themselves. O c. No; the researchers have no control over whether or not the participants prefer dates who are similar to them. OD. No; the researchers cannot manipulate the difference between the participants' actual selves and their ideal selves. Which statement best explains the patient's behavior in terms of operant conditioning? O A. Feelings of inferiority function as a positive reinforcer for attending social events with partner. O B. Feelings of inferiority function as a negative reinforcer for attending social events with partner. O C. Feelings of inferiority function as a positive punisher for attending social events with partner. O D. Feelings of inferiority function as a negative punisher for attending social events with partner.

Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
5th Edition
ISBN:9780134477961
Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Chapter1: The Science Of Psychology
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1TY
icon
Related questions
Question
A patient who experiences low self-esteem seeks the help of a
therapist. The therapist finds that the patient's self-esteem problems
started after his current relationship began. The patient describes his
current partner as being highly successful and competent and reports
feeling inferior to his partner. He reports that he "hates feeling that
way." He has stopped attending social events with his partner because
such events elevate his feelings of inferiority. However, despite his
feelings of inferiority and envy, the patient also reports having extreme
admiration and love for his partner.
When researching for the case, the therapist reads a study on
interpersonal attraction. The researchers asked participants to rate
their actual self and their ideal self on 50 personality dimensions. These
ratings were then used to develop two scores as proxy measures of
actual and ideal self. Then, the participants were told that they were
going to be paired with potential dates and were given information on
their potential dates' scores on the same personality dimensions. The
dates' scores were made up by the researchers to be either similar to or
different from each participant's actual self or ideal scores. The study
showed that participants reported greater interest in dates who were
similar to their ideal selves than in dates who were similar to their
actual selves. The therapist finds the study relevant to the patient's
case but is reluctant to make direct inferences because she suspects
that the participants' ratings of actual self may have been influenced by
social desirability.
The therapist decides that the self-evaluation maintenance model
(SEM) may help explain the patient's case. The model posits that
upward comparison (comparing oneself with a more successful other)
can lead to negative self-evaluation, which causes psychological
distress. The individual is motivated to eliminate this distress, either by
downplaying the relevance of the dimension of comparison (for
example, if the patient's partner is a successful mathematician, the
patient can state that mathematical skills are not that important) or by
weakening the social bonds with the successful other.
The patient described in the passage is most likely using which defense
mechanism?
O A. Projection
O B.
ation
O c. Reaction formation
O D. Emotional displacement
Was the independent variable in the study manipulated by the
researchers?
OA. Yes; the researchers obtained specific measures of the
actual self and the ideal self from the participants.
OB. Yes; the researchers controlled the similarity of the potential
date to the participant's ratings of themselves.
O c. No; the researchers have no control over whether or not the
participants prefer dates who are similar to them.
OD. No; the researchers cannot manipulate the difference
between the participants' actual selves and their ideal
selves.
Which statement best explains the patient's behavior in terms of
operant conditioning?
O A. Feelings of inferiority function as a positive reinforcer for
attending social events with partner.
OB. Feelings of inferiority function as a negative reinforcer for
attending social events with partner.
O C. Feelings of inferiority function as a positive punisher for
attending social events with partner.
O D. Feelings of inferiority function as a negative punisher for
attending social events with partner.
Which statement is NOT a plausible application of psychodynamic
theory to explain psychological responses to upward comparison?
OA. The superego demands that the individual should either
match or surpass the partner on the dimension of
comparison.
OB. The ego fails to satisfy the demands of the superego, and
the individual experiences anxiety.
OC. The id attempts to use the pleasure principle to resolve the
subconscious conflict caused by the superego.
O D. The ego uses rationalization by suggesting that the
dimension of comparison is unimportant.
Transcribed Image Text:A patient who experiences low self-esteem seeks the help of a therapist. The therapist finds that the patient's self-esteem problems started after his current relationship began. The patient describes his current partner as being highly successful and competent and reports feeling inferior to his partner. He reports that he "hates feeling that way." He has stopped attending social events with his partner because such events elevate his feelings of inferiority. However, despite his feelings of inferiority and envy, the patient also reports having extreme admiration and love for his partner. When researching for the case, the therapist reads a study on interpersonal attraction. The researchers asked participants to rate their actual self and their ideal self on 50 personality dimensions. These ratings were then used to develop two scores as proxy measures of actual and ideal self. Then, the participants were told that they were going to be paired with potential dates and were given information on their potential dates' scores on the same personality dimensions. The dates' scores were made up by the researchers to be either similar to or different from each participant's actual self or ideal scores. The study showed that participants reported greater interest in dates who were similar to their ideal selves than in dates who were similar to their actual selves. The therapist finds the study relevant to the patient's case but is reluctant to make direct inferences because she suspects that the participants' ratings of actual self may have been influenced by social desirability. The therapist decides that the self-evaluation maintenance model (SEM) may help explain the patient's case. The model posits that upward comparison (comparing oneself with a more successful other) can lead to negative self-evaluation, which causes psychological distress. The individual is motivated to eliminate this distress, either by downplaying the relevance of the dimension of comparison (for example, if the patient's partner is a successful mathematician, the patient can state that mathematical skills are not that important) or by weakening the social bonds with the successful other. The patient described in the passage is most likely using which defense mechanism? O A. Projection O B. ation O c. Reaction formation O D. Emotional displacement Was the independent variable in the study manipulated by the researchers? OA. Yes; the researchers obtained specific measures of the actual self and the ideal self from the participants. OB. Yes; the researchers controlled the similarity of the potential date to the participant's ratings of themselves. O c. No; the researchers have no control over whether or not the participants prefer dates who are similar to them. OD. No; the researchers cannot manipulate the difference between the participants' actual selves and their ideal selves. Which statement best explains the patient's behavior in terms of operant conditioning? O A. Feelings of inferiority function as a positive reinforcer for attending social events with partner. OB. Feelings of inferiority function as a negative reinforcer for attending social events with partner. O C. Feelings of inferiority function as a positive punisher for attending social events with partner. O D. Feelings of inferiority function as a negative punisher for attending social events with partner. Which statement is NOT a plausible application of psychodynamic theory to explain psychological responses to upward comparison? OA. The superego demands that the individual should either match or surpass the partner on the dimension of comparison. OB. The ego fails to satisfy the demands of the superego, and the individual experiences anxiety. OC. The id attempts to use the pleasure principle to resolve the subconscious conflict caused by the superego. O D. The ego uses rationalization by suggesting that the dimension of comparison is unimportant.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780134477961
Author:
Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:
PEARSON
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337408271
Author:
Goldstein, E. Bruce.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337565691
Author:
Dennis Coon, John O. Mitterer, Tanya S. Martini
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780393265156
Author:
Sarah Grison, Michael Gazzaniga
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Psychology
ISBN:
9781285763880
Author:
E. Bruce Goldstein
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Psychology
ISBN:
9781305652958
Author:
Duane P. Schultz, Sydney Ellen Schultz
Publisher:
Cengage Learning