A new antitheft system incorporating MEMS technology is being separately evaluated economically by three engineers at Dragon Technologies. The first cost of the equipment will be $89,000, and the life is estimated at 6 years with a salvage value of $9000. The engineers made different estimates of the net savings that the equipment might generate. Jacob made an estimate of $10,000 per year. Susan states that this is too low and estimates $14,000, while Tyler estimates $25,000 per year before tax. If the MARR is 8% per year, use PW to determine if these different estimates will change the decision to purchase the equipment. The present worth of the pessimistic estimate is $ The present worth of the most likely estimate is $ The present worth of the optimistic estimate is $

A new antitheft system incorporating MEMS technology is being separately evaluated economically by three engineers at Dragon Technologies. The first cost of the equipment will be $89,000, and the life is estimated at 6 years with a salvage value of $9000. The engineers made different estimates of the net savings that the equipment might generate. Jacob made an estimate of $10,000 per year. Susan states that this is too low and estimates $14,000, while Tyler estimates $25,000 per year before tax. If the MARR is 8% per year, use PW to determine if these different estimates will change the decision to purchase the equipment. The present worth of the pessimistic estimate is $ The present worth of the most likely estimate is $ The present worth of the optimistic estimate is $

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A small strip-mining coal company is trying to decide whether it should purchase or lease a new clamshell. If purchased, the “shell” will cost $140,000 and is expected to have a $45,000 salvage value after 6 years. Alternatively, the company can lease a clamshell for only $14,000 per year, but the lease payment will have to be made at the beginning of each year. If the clamshell is purchased, it will be leased to other strip-mining companies whenever possible, an activity that is expected to yield revenues of $10,000 per year. If the company’s MARR is 12% per year, should the clamshell be purchased or leased on the basis of a future worth analysis? Assume the annual M&O cost is the same for both options. The future worth when purchased is $ . The future worth when leased is $ .
Lego Group in Bellund, Denmark, manufactures Lego toy construction blocks. The company is considering two methods for producing special-purpose Lego parts. Method 1 will have an initial cost of $460,000, an annual operating cost of $100,000, and a life of 3 years. Method 2 will have an initial cost of $560,000, an operating cost of $90,000 per year, and a 6-year life. Assume 11% salvage values for both methods. Lego uses an MARR of 9% per year. Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
None
A-Z Technologies, a manufacturer of amplified pressure transducers, is trying to decide between a dual-speed and a variable-speed machine. The engineers are not sure about the salvage value of the variable speed machine, so they have asked several different used-equipment dealers for estimates. The results can be summarized as follows: there is a 35% chance of getting $18,000, a 41% chance of getting $24,000, and a 13% chance of getting $29,000. Also, there is an 11% chance that the company may have to pay $5000 to dispose of the equipment. Calculate the expected salvage value.
ABC Company has revenues of Php500,000, variable costs of Php350,000, and fixed cost of Php135,000. Compute the total revenues needed to breakeven.
Hemisphere Electric may purchase equipment to manufacture a new line of wireless devices for home appliance control. The first cost of the equipment will be $78,000, and the life of the equipment is estimated to be 6 years with a salvage value of $10,000. Different people in marketing have provided revenue estimates that the devices will generate. The estimates range from a low of $10,000 to a high of $20,000, with an average of $16,000 per year. If the MARR is 9% per year, use PW to determine if these different estimates will change the decision to purchase the equipment. The present worth of low estimate range is $ The present worth of average estimate range is $ The present worth of high estimate range is $[ The $10,000 revenue estimate does not favor The $16,000 revenue estimate does not favor The $20,000 revenue estimate favors the purchase. the purchase. the purchase.
A portable concrete test instrument used in construction for evaluating and profiling concrete surfaces (MACRS-GDS 5-year property class) is under consideration by a construction firm for $25,500. The instrument will be used for 6 years and be worth $2,500 at that time. The annual cost of use and maintenance will be $13,000. Alternatively, a more automated instrument (same property class) available from the manufacturer costs $26,000, with use and maintenance costs of only $7,500 and salvage value after 6 years of $3,000. The marginal tax rate is 25%, and MARR is an after-tax 12%. Determine which alternative is less costly, based upon comparison of after-tax annual worth. Show the AW values used to make your decision.
Raytheon wishes to use an automated environmental chamber in the manufacture of electronic components. The chamber is to be used for rigorous reliability testing and burn-in. It is installed for $800,000, $350,000 of which is borrowed at 11% for 5 years, and will have a salvage value of $150,000 after 8 years. Its use will create an opportunity to increase sales by $650,000 per year and will have operating expenses of $250,000 per year. Corporate income taxes are 40%. Develop tables using a spreadsheet to determine the ATCF for each year and the after-tax PW, AW, IRR, and ERR, if the chamber is kept for 8 years. After-tax MARR is 10%. Use 7 years class depreciation for MARCS
A construction company is evaluating the purchase of a new concrete mixer with hydraulic hopper and automatic controller. The mixer will have a first cost of BD 12,000, a life of 9 years, and no salvage value. It will require 2 operators at a cost of BD 4.500 per hour each. A total of one cubic meter of concrete can be poured each hour by the mixer. Alternatively, if human labor is used, 5 workers, each earning BD 4 per hour, are required to one cubic meter per hour. The estimated cost of the material is BD 21 per cubic meter and the MARR is 7% per year (clearly show the S.N., numeric answer, and final decision). a) Determine the minimum cubic meters per year to justify the purchase of the automatic mixer. b) The company expects to produce 140 cubic meters per year, which option should they select? Why?
A new antitheft system incorporating MEMS technology is being separately evaluated economically by three engineers at Dragon Technologies. The first cost of the equipment will be $90,000, and the life is estimated at 6 years with a salvage value of $9000. The engineers made different estimates of the net savings that the equipment might generate. Jacob made an estimate of $9,000 per year. Susan states that this is too low and estimates $18,000, while Tyler estimates $21,000 per year before tax. If the MARR is 8% per year, use PW to determine if these different estimates will change the decision to purchase the equipment. The present worth of the pessimistic estimate is $ The present worth of the most likely estimate is $ The present worth of the optimistic estimate is $ The equipment purchase by the pessimistic estimate is not justified The equipment purchase by the most likely estimate is not justified The equipment purchase by the optimistic estimate is justified
Dexcon Technologies, Inc., is evaluating two alternatives to produce its new plastic filament with low friction properties for creating custom bearings for 3-D printers. The estimates associated with each alternative are shown below. Using a MARR of 16% per year, which alternative has the better present worth and what is that value (select the closest value)? Method First Cost AOC, per Year Salvage Value Life DDM $170,000 $65,000 $4,000 2 years LS $350,000 $40,000 $29,000 4 years DDM with a PW--$473,000 LS with a PW --$445,900 LS with a PW --$222,055 DDM with a PW--$109,300
An IE works in the automation department of a surgical equipment manufacturing company that produces specially ordered equipment for hospitals. To upgrade the quality of the assembly process of the camera used in laparoscopic surgery probes, two approaches are available: make and buy. The make alternative has an initial equipment cost of $175,000, a life of 5 years, a $25,000 salvage value, a processing cost of $3,000 per camera, and an M&O cost of $90,000. The buy alternative requires contracting the assembly operation externally at a cost of $7,250 per camera. If the MARR is 12% per year, how many cameras per year must be assembled to justify the make alternative? 27 cameras must be assembled per year to justify the make alternative.