Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
(a) n- 19, t- 3.1, a- 0.05 P.value - State the conclusion in the problem context. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. (b) n- 9, t 1.6, a- 0.01 P-value - State the conclusion in the problem context. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. (c) n- 22, t -0.4 P-value - State the conclusion in the problem context. O Reject O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. null hypothesis. There sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

(a) n- 19, t- 3.1, a- 0.05 P.value - State the conclusion in the problem context. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. (b) n- 9, t 1.6, a- 0.01 P-value - State the conclusion in the problem context. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. (c) n- 22, t -0.4 P-value - State the conclusion in the problem context. O Reject O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. null hypothesis. There sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 22SGR
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
The paint used to make lines on roads must reflect enough light to be clearly visible at night. Let u denote the true average reflectometer reading for a new type of paint under consideration. A test of Ho: µ = 20 versus H: µ > 20 will be based on a random sample of size n from a normal population distribution. What conclusion is appropriate in each of the following situations? (Round your P-values to three decimal places.) n USE SALT (a) n = 19, t = 3.1, a = 0.05 P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. (b) n = 9, t = 1.6, a = 0.01 P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. (c) n = 22, t = -0.4 P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.
Transcribed Image Text:The paint used to make lines on roads must reflect enough light to be clearly visible at night. Let u denote the true average reflectometer reading for a new type of paint under consideration. A test of Ho: µ = 20 versus H: µ > 20 will be based on a random sample of size n from a normal population distribution. What conclusion is appropriate in each of the following situations? (Round your P-values to three decimal places.) n USE SALT (a) n = 19, t = 3.1, a = 0.05 P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. (b) n = 9, t = 1.6, a = 0.01 P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. (c) n = 22, t = -0.4 P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS