A manufacturing process that unintentionally introduces cracks to the surface of a part was used to produce load-bearing components. The design requires that the component be able to withstand a stress of 450 MPa. The component failed catastrophically in service. You are a failure analysis engineer who must determine whether the component failed due to an overload in the service or flaws from the manufacturing process. The manufacturer claims that the components were polished to remove the cracks and inspected to ensure that no surface cracks were larger than 0.5 mm. the manufacturer believe the component failed due to operator error. It has been independently verified that he 5 cm diameter part was subjected to a tensile load of 1 MN (106 N) The material from which the component is made had a fracture toughness of 75 MPaÖm and ultimate tensile strength of 600 MPa. Assume external cracks for which f = 1.12. Who is at fault for the component failure, the manufacturer or the operator? Show your work for both cases. In addition to the analysis that you presented in (a), what features might you look for on the fracture surfaces to support your conclusion?
A manufacturing process that unintentionally introduces cracks to the surface of a part was used to produce load-bearing components. The design requires that the component be able to withstand a stress of 450 MPa. The component failed catastrophically in service. You are a failure analysis engineer who must determine whether the component failed due to an overload in the service or flaws from the manufacturing process. The manufacturer claims that the components were polished to remove the cracks and inspected to ensure that no surface cracks were larger than 0.5 mm. the manufacturer believe the component failed due to operator error. It has been independently verified that he 5 cm diameter part was subjected to a tensile load of 1 MN (106 N) The material from which the component is made had a fracture toughness of 75 MPaÖm and ultimate tensile strength of 600 MPa. Assume external cracks for which f = 1.12. Who is at fault for the component failure, the manufacturer or the operator? Show your work for both cases. In addition to the analysis that you presented in (a), what features might you look for on the fracture surfaces to support your conclusion?
Elements Of Electromagnetics
7th Edition
ISBN:9780190698614
Author:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
ChapterMA: Math Assessment
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1MA
Related questions
Question
A manufacturing process that unintentionally introduces cracks to the surface of a part was used to produce load-bearing components. The design requires that the component be able to withstand a stress of 450 MPa. The component failed catastrophically in service.
You are a failure analysis engineer who must determine whether the component failed due to an overload in the service or flaws from the manufacturing process. The manufacturer claims that the components were polished to remove the cracks and inspected to ensure that no surface cracks were larger than 0.5 mm. the manufacturer believe the component failed due to operator error.
It has been independently verified that he 5 cm diameter part was subjected to a tensile load of 1 MN (106 N)
The material from which the component is made had a fracture toughness of 75 MPaÖm and ultimate tensile strength of 600 MPa. Assume external cracks for which f = 1.12.
- Who is at fault for the component failure, the manufacturer or the operator? Show your work for both cases.
- In addition to the analysis that you presented in (a), what features might you look for on the fracture surfaces to support your conclusion?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, mechanical-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780190698614
Author:
Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780134319650
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781259822674
Author:
Yunus A. Cengel Dr., Michael A. Boles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780190698614
Author:
Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780134319650
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781259822674
Author:
Yunus A. Cengel Dr., Michael A. Boles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Control Systems Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118170519
Author:
Norman S. Nise
Publisher:
WILEY
Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781337093347
Author:
Barry J. Goodno, James M. Gere
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118807330
Author:
James L. Meriam, L. G. Kraige, J. N. Bolton
Publisher:
WILEY