A large batch of soil samples was analysed to determine presence of certain polluting agents. For each sample, the quantity of certain pollutant elements was determined and afterwards, Principal Component Analysis was performed with these data. The following is the loadings matrix. PC2 Potasium Iron Magnesium Cadmium PC1 PC3 PC4 0.03967 -0.06958 -0.01218 -0.99671 0.79202 -0.01139 -0.60909 0.03976 -0.4302 -0.71979 -0.54336 0.03976 -0.43133 0.6906 -0.5776 -0.05832 Match each component with its interpretation. PC4 Choose... PC1 Choose... PC2 Choose... PC3 A contrast between Iron and the average of Magnesium and Cadmium Mostly variable Potasium A (weighted) average of variables Magnesium, Cadmium, Iron A contrast (comparison) between Magnesium and Cadmium

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question
A large batch of soil samples was analysed to determine presence of certain polluting agents. For each sample, the quantity of certain pollutant
elements was determined and afterwards, Principal Component Analysis was performed with these data.
The following is the loadings matrix.
PC2
Potasium
Iron
Magnesium
Cadmium
PC1
PC3
PC4
0.03967 -0.06958 -0.01218 -0.99671
0.79202 -0.01139 -0.60909 0.03976
-0.4302 -0.71979 -0.54336 0.03976
-0.43133 0.6906 -0.5776 -0.05832
Match each component with its interpretation.
PC4 Choose...
PC1 Choose...
PC2 Choose...
PC3
A contrast between Iron and the average of Magnesium and Cadmium
Mostly variable Potasium
A (weighted) average of variables Magnesium, Cadmium, Iron
A contrast (comparison) between Magnesium and Cadmium
Transcribed Image Text:A large batch of soil samples was analysed to determine presence of certain polluting agents. For each sample, the quantity of certain pollutant elements was determined and afterwards, Principal Component Analysis was performed with these data. The following is the loadings matrix. PC2 Potasium Iron Magnesium Cadmium PC1 PC3 PC4 0.03967 -0.06958 -0.01218 -0.99671 0.79202 -0.01139 -0.60909 0.03976 -0.4302 -0.71979 -0.54336 0.03976 -0.43133 0.6906 -0.5776 -0.05832 Match each component with its interpretation. PC4 Choose... PC1 Choose... PC2 Choose... PC3 A contrast between Iron and the average of Magnesium and Cadmium Mostly variable Potasium A (weighted) average of variables Magnesium, Cadmium, Iron A contrast (comparison) between Magnesium and Cadmium
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,