(a) Indicate how h in this second scenario compares to h in the original scenario, and explain why without mathematically deriving a relation for h (sin20)kz (b) Students derive an equation for the maximum height h in the original scenario,n 2Mg which may or may not be correct. Is this equation consistent with your claim in part (a)? Explain why or why not.
(a) Indicate how h in this second scenario compares to h in the original scenario, and explain why without mathematically deriving a relation for h (sin20)kz (b) Students derive an equation for the maximum height h in the original scenario,n 2Mg which may or may not be correct. Is this equation consistent with your claim in part (a)? Explain why or why not.
College Physics
11th Edition
ISBN:9781305952300
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Chapter1: Units, Trigonometry. And Vectors
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1CQ: Estimate the order of magnitude of the length, in meters, of each of the following; (a) a mouse, (b)...
Related questions
Question
100%

Transcribed Image Text:Physics FRQ Extra Practice
Name:
M
000000000
A box is pressed against a horizontal spring, compressing the spring from its relaxed length. The box
is then released and the spring launches the box horizontally along a track that ends in a ramp, as
shown above. The box has enough speed to leave the ramp, and the box reaches a maximum
vertical height above the floor. Assume there is negligible friction between the box and the track and
air resistance is negligible.
is the spring constant of the spring.
is the distance the spring is compressed.
is the mass of the box.
(theta) is the angle of the ramp from the horizontal.
h
is the maximum height reached by the box.
The scenario is repeated with the box compressing the spring a distance that is larger than the
original distance x.
(a) Indicate how h in this second scenario compares to h in the original scenario, and explain why
without mathematically deriving a relation for h
(sin 0)kz
(b) Students derive an equation for the maximum height h in the original scenario, n%D
2Mg
which may or may not be correct. Is this equation consistent with your claim in part (a)? Explain why
or why not.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you

College Physics
Physics
ISBN:
9781305952300
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

University Physics (14th Edition)
Physics
ISBN:
9780133969290
Author:
Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
Publisher:
PEARSON

Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Physics
ISBN:
9781107189638
Author:
Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press

College Physics
Physics
ISBN:
9781305952300
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

University Physics (14th Edition)
Physics
ISBN:
9780133969290
Author:
Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
Publisher:
PEARSON

Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Physics
ISBN:
9781107189638
Author:
Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press

Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics
ISBN:
9781337553278
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy
Physics
ISBN:
9780321820464
Author:
Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina Brissenden
Publisher:
Addison-Wesley

College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio…
Physics
ISBN:
9780134609034
Author:
Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart Field
Publisher:
PEARSON