A computer manufacturer is interested in comparing assembly times for two keyboard assembly processes. Assembly times can vary considerably from worker to worker, and the company decides to eliminate this effect by selecting 12 workers at random and timing each worker on each assembly process. Half of the workers are chosen at random to use Process 1 first, and the rest use Process 2 first. For each worker and each process, the assembly time (in minutes) is recorded, as shown in the table below. Worker Process 1 Process 2 Difference (Process 1 Process 2) Send data to calculator 1 50 33 17 2 79 59 20 3 53 44 9 4 71 64 7 5 6 7 8 9 9 48 49 -1 49 34 35 48 34 61 15 1 -13 56 53 3 10 62 71 11 47 12 77 46 58 -9 1 19 Based on these data, can the company conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the mean assembly times for the two processes differ? Answer this question by performing a hypothesis test regarding μ (which is u with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in assembly times for the two processes. Assume that this population of differences (Process 1 minus Process 2) is normally distributed. Perform a two-tailed test. Then complete the parts below. Carry your intermediate computations to three or more decimal places and round your answers as specified. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.)

Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
4th Edition
ISBN:9781285463247
Author:David Poole
Publisher:David Poole
Chapter2: Systems Of Linear Equations
Section2.4: Applications
Problem 28EQ
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

A computer manufacturer is interested in comparing assembly times for two keyboard assembly processes. Assembly times can vary considerably from worker to worker, and the company decides to eliminate this effect by selecting 12 workers at random and timing each worker on each assembly process. Half of the workers are chosen at random to use Process 1 first, and the rest use Process 2 first. For each worker and each process, the assembly time (in minutes) is recorded, as shown in the table below.

Based on these data, can the company conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the mean assembly times for the two processes differ? Answer this question by performing a hypothesis test regarding μd (which is μ with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in assembly times for the two processes. Assume that this population of differences (Process 1 minus Process 2) is normally distributed.

Perform a two-tailed test. Then complete the parts below. Carry your intermediate computations to three or more decimal places and round your answers as specified. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.)

A computer manufacturer is interested in comparing assembly times for two keyboard assembly processes. Assembly times can vary considerably from worker
to worker, and the company decides to eliminate this effect by selecting 12 workers at random and timing each worker on each assembly process. Half of the
workers are chosen at random to use Process 1 first, and the rest use Process 2 first. For each worker and each process, the assembly time (in minutes) is
recorded, as shown in the table below.
Worker
Process 1
Process 2
Difference
(Process 1 - Process 2)
Send data to calculator
50
33
17
2
79
59
20
3
53
44
9
4
71
64
7
5
48
49
6
49
34
-1 15
35
34
8
48 56
61
9
1 -13
53
3
10
62
71
-9
11
47
46
1
12
77
58
19
Based on these data, can the company conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the mean assembly times for the two processes differ? Answer this
question by performing a hypothesis test regarding μd (which is u with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in assembly times for the two
processes. Assume that this population of differences (Process 1 minus Process 2) is normally distributed.
Perform a two-tailed test. Then complete the parts below. Carry your intermediate computations to three or more decimal places and round your answers as
specified. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.)
Transcribed Image Text:A computer manufacturer is interested in comparing assembly times for two keyboard assembly processes. Assembly times can vary considerably from worker to worker, and the company decides to eliminate this effect by selecting 12 workers at random and timing each worker on each assembly process. Half of the workers are chosen at random to use Process 1 first, and the rest use Process 2 first. For each worker and each process, the assembly time (in minutes) is recorded, as shown in the table below. Worker Process 1 Process 2 Difference (Process 1 - Process 2) Send data to calculator 50 33 17 2 79 59 20 3 53 44 9 4 71 64 7 5 48 49 6 49 34 -1 15 35 34 8 48 56 61 9 1 -13 53 3 10 62 71 -9 11 47 46 1 12 77 58 19 Based on these data, can the company conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the mean assembly times for the two processes differ? Answer this question by performing a hypothesis test regarding μd (which is u with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in assembly times for the two processes. Assume that this population of differences (Process 1 minus Process 2) is normally distributed. Perform a two-tailed test. Then complete the parts below. Carry your intermediate computations to three or more decimal places and round your answers as specified. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.)
Based on these data, can the company conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the mean assembly times for the two processes differ? Answer this
question by performing a hypothesis test regarding μ (which is u with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in assembly times for the two
processes. Assume that this population of differences (Process 1 minus Process 2) is normally distributed.
Perform a two-tailed test. Then complete the parts below. Carry your intermediate computations to three or more decimal places and round your answers as
specified. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.)
(a) State the null hypothesis Ho and the alternative hypothesis H₁.
Ho :O
H₁ U
(b) Determine the type of test statistic to use.
Type of test statistic: (Choose one)
(c) Find the value of the test statistic. (Round to three or more decimal places.)
U
(d) Find the two critical values at the 0.05 level of significance. (Round to three or more decimal places.)
and
(e) At the 0.05 level, can the company conclude that the mean assembly times for the two processes
differ?
O Yes O No
μ
Ix
X
0
0#0
a
X
S Â
0=0 OSO 020
р
O<O
00
S
O<O
Transcribed Image Text:Based on these data, can the company conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the mean assembly times for the two processes differ? Answer this question by performing a hypothesis test regarding μ (which is u with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in assembly times for the two processes. Assume that this population of differences (Process 1 minus Process 2) is normally distributed. Perform a two-tailed test. Then complete the parts below. Carry your intermediate computations to three or more decimal places and round your answers as specified. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.) (a) State the null hypothesis Ho and the alternative hypothesis H₁. Ho :O H₁ U (b) Determine the type of test statistic to use. Type of test statistic: (Choose one) (c) Find the value of the test statistic. (Round to three or more decimal places.) U (d) Find the two critical values at the 0.05 level of significance. (Round to three or more decimal places.) and (e) At the 0.05 level, can the company conclude that the mean assembly times for the two processes differ? O Yes O No μ Ix X 0 0#0 a X S Â 0=0 OSO 020 р O<O 00 S O<O
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463247
Author:
David Poole
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,