8. What was a fundamental consequence of Buckley v. Valeo (1976)? O a. It established a clean elections system for federal races. b. It removed restrictions on campaign spending limits based on free speech concerns. O c. It removed restrictions on campaign contribution limits based on free speech concerns. d. It outlawed the system of public financing for presidential elections.
8. What was a fundamental consequence of Buckley v. Valeo (1976)? O a. It established a clean elections system for federal races. b. It removed restrictions on campaign spending limits based on free speech concerns. O c. It removed restrictions on campaign contribution limits based on free speech concerns. d. It outlawed the system of public financing for presidential elections.
Related questions
Question
![**Question 8**
**8. What was a fundamental consequence of *Buckley v. Valeo* (1976)?**
- a. It established a clean elections system for federal races.
- b. It removed restrictions on campaign spending limits based on free speech concerns. [Selected Answer]
- c. It removed restrictions on campaign contribution limits based on free speech concerns.
- d. It outlawed the system of public financing for presidential elections.
**Question 9**
**9. After the House has impeached the president, the president:**
- a. is removed from office unless the Senate casts a majority vote in support of the president.
- b. is removed from office unless the Senate casts a two-thirds majority vote in support of the president.
- c. continues to serve unless the Senate votes to remove the president from office with a majority vote.
- d. continues to serve unless the Senate votes to remove the president from office with a two-thirds majority vote.
In the provided text, the correct answer to Question 8 is option "b," which states that *Buckley v. Valeo* (1976) removed restrictions on campaign spending limits based on free speech concerns.
For Question 9, the correct answer is option "d," which explains that after the House has impeached the president, the president continues to serve unless the Senate votes to remove the president from office with a two-thirds majority vote.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F50c4a886-3e07-4312-95fc-3240a8ded880%2F39ecd785-2d63-4f3f-99d4-ac859df590cb%2F4qc45l_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:**Question 8**
**8. What was a fundamental consequence of *Buckley v. Valeo* (1976)?**
- a. It established a clean elections system for federal races.
- b. It removed restrictions on campaign spending limits based on free speech concerns. [Selected Answer]
- c. It removed restrictions on campaign contribution limits based on free speech concerns.
- d. It outlawed the system of public financing for presidential elections.
**Question 9**
**9. After the House has impeached the president, the president:**
- a. is removed from office unless the Senate casts a majority vote in support of the president.
- b. is removed from office unless the Senate casts a two-thirds majority vote in support of the president.
- c. continues to serve unless the Senate votes to remove the president from office with a majority vote.
- d. continues to serve unless the Senate votes to remove the president from office with a two-thirds majority vote.
In the provided text, the correct answer to Question 8 is option "b," which states that *Buckley v. Valeo* (1976) removed restrictions on campaign spending limits based on free speech concerns.
For Question 9, the correct answer is option "d," which explains that after the House has impeached the president, the president continues to serve unless the Senate votes to remove the president from office with a two-thirds majority vote.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
